Skip to content

Effectiveness of Ultrapulse for the Treatment of Androgenic Alopecia Among Malaysian: A Quasi-experimental Study

Effectiveness of Ultrapulse for the Treatment of Androgenic Alopecia Among Malaysian: A Quasi-experimental Study

Status
Enrolling by invitation
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06292533
Enrollment
92
Registered
2024-03-05
Start date
2024-12-01
Completion date
2025-12-31
Last updated
2024-12-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Alopecia, Androgenic Alopecia

Keywords

Androgenic Alopecia, Alopecia treatment, Ultrapulse, Malaysian

Brief summary

The goal of this study is to to evaluate the effectiveness of Ultrapulse for the treatment of androgenic alopecia among Malaysian. The main questions it aims to answer are: * the efficacy of Ultrapulse in treatment of androgenic alopecia among Malaysian * the safety and adverse effect of Ultrapulse treatment. * the quality of life of androgenic alopecia among Malaysian.

Detailed description

Ultrapulse is a is a laser beauty device using erbium-doped yttrium aluminium garnet laser (er:YAG). Er:YAG laser is a laser with wavelength of 2940nm which is able to penetrate into the dermis to a depth of 3-4 mm, and energy absorption occurs in the area of the dermal papilla, resulting in an increase in blood circulation of the papilla and activation of metabolism in the hair follicle. It generates multiple micro pores at the epidermal layer that enhances the absorption of the active substances that help to stimulate hair growth developed by Lyzer Co. Ltd in Korea.

Interventions

DEVICEEr:YAG laser

Ultrapulse is a is a laser beauty device using erbium-doped yttrium aluminium garnet laser (er:YAG). Er:YAG laser is a laser with wavelength of 2940nm which is able to penetrate into the dermis to a depth of 3-4 mm, and energy absorption occurs in the area of the dermal papilla, resulting in an increase in blood circulation of the papilla and activation of metabolism in the hair follicle.

Sponsors

Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

\- Patient with androgenic alopecia with severity of Norwood-Hamilton Scale II to VI for male and Ludwig Scale I to III for female

Exclusion criteria

* Use of topical or systemic medications affecting hair growth within the 6 months before recruitment * Previous hair transplantation, underwent scalp reconstruction procedure, hair braiding or scalp tattoo

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Global assessment of hair growth4 monthsHair loss index will be recorded in the map and chart provided Cohen Hair Loss Classification System. The hair loss is scored with a single value from 1 to 100 to represent the percentage of hair of the patient's scalp. Global photography of the participant's scalp will be taken during first visit (baseline), immediate post-treatment (6 treatments), 2 weeks post-treatment and 1 month post-treatment. The evaluator will be responsible for scoring the hair loss index based on the global photograph provided.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient satisfaction4 monthsThe patient satisfaction of the participants in both intervention and control-waitlist group will be assessed during first visit (baseline), immediate post-treatment (6 treatments), 2 weeks post-treatment and 1 month post-treatment. by using SAPS questionnaire. It is scored by 0 (extremely dissatisfied) to 28 (extremely satisfied).
Quality of Life of Patient4 monthsThe Hair specific Skindex-29 questionnaire comprised three types of scales: a symptom scale (7 items), a function scale (12 items), and an emotion scale (10 items). It is rated each question on a scale from 0 (never bothered) to 5 (always bothered). Responses for each item were converted to a linear scale, ranging from 0 (never bothered) to 100 (always bothered). A scale score represented the average score of the answered items, while a global score was the mean of the sums of each scale. A high score indicated a significantly impaired quality of life, whereas a low score indicated a mild impact on quality of life. The quality of life of the participants in both intervention and control-waitlist group will be assessed during first visit (baseline), immediate post-treatment (6 treatments), 2 weeks post-treatment and 1 month post-treatment.
Adverse effects4 monthsThe adverse effects of the treatment will be recorded in the table in the provided sheet with the severity of 0 (no effect) to 3 (severe) except for pain using the visual analog scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (extreme pain). The adverse effects will be recorded before and after participant received every treatment and during follow up.

Countries

Malaysia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026