Skip to content

Healing Lodge First Face Training Evaluation Study

Healing Lodge First Face Training Evaluation Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06290180
Enrollment
92
Registered
2024-03-04
Start date
2024-04-04
Completion date
2025-04-30
Last updated
2025-12-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Addiction, Depression/Anxiety, Self-harm, Trauma, Psychological

Keywords

mental health, prevention, addiction, substance use disorders

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate a culturally grounded training program, xaʔtus (meaning First Face) for Mental Health. This program will train community members in how to recognize and respond to youth and adults experiencing mental health crises and ways to serve as a bridge between these individuals and the help they need. All Healing Lodge staff are being asked to complete First Face training. To evaluate First Face, the investigators will ask all trainees to complete surveys before and after training, and again 3 months later. These surveys will measure knowledge about mental health and addiction, as well as the ability and confidence to respond appropriately to mental health crises. The study will help the investigators understand whether the First Face training program influences mental health and attitudes, as well as responses to mental health crisis situations.

Detailed description

With funding from the National Institutes for Health, the investigators created First Face for Mental Health. First Face is a culturally-appropriate community-based mental health training that prepares trainees to provide assistance to someone having a mental health crisis. The more community members within Tribal nations who are trained in a culturally sensitive program to provide support to youth in recovery and members struggling with mental health problems or crises, the better positioned that community is to create a supportive recovery environment for its youth. The investigators are in the process of launching First Face trainings and evaluations among several Tribal communities. Additionally, they will be training staff from the Healing Lodge of the Seven Nations (HL) in the First Face program. This particular application concerns the evaluation of First Face training among HL staff. The investigators will measure primary and secondary outcomes at pre-training, post-training, and 3-month follow-up.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALFirst Face for Mental Heatlh

First Face for Mental Health is a culturally-appropriate community-based mental health training for lay persons and others that prepares learners to provide assistance to someone having a mental health crisis. The course takes approximately 8 hours to complete.

Sponsors

National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS)
CollaboratorNIH
Cambridge Health Alliance
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Pre/post/3-month follow-up model

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Employment at the Healing Lodge of the Seven Nations * Selection to participate in First Face for Mental Health training

Exclusion criteria

° Previous completion of First Face for Mental Health training

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Attitudes Towards Serious Mental Illness - Adolescent VersionIncluded at pre-training, post-training (i.e. immediately after training), and 3-months post-trainingThe Attitudes Towards Serious Mental Illness - Adolescent Version (ATSMI-AV) is a validated 21-item self-report scale designed to measure attitudes towards mental illness. Participants respond on a 5-point Likert scale. The scale measures five aspects of mental health attitudes: threat, social construction/concern, wishful thinking, categorical thinking and out of control. The investigators will calculate an overall score as well as factor-specific scores, if they observe adequate internal reliability. Each item has response categories ranging from Completely disagree (coded as 1) to Completely agree (coded as 5), and a mean of all 21 items is calculated to create the scale. The scale has a possible range of 1 to 5 Higher scores indicate higher levels of stigma towards mental illness.
First Face Knowledge AssessmentIncluded at pre-training, post-training (i.e. immediately after training), and 3-months post-trainingThis is a 12-question quiz testing participants' knowledge of concepts taught in the First Face training. Some questions offer the opportunity to earn more than one point. The investigators will score each response as correct or incorrect and sum scores (possible range = 0-17) on each occasion. Higher scores indicate better knowledge of First Face concepts.
Perceived Competence to RespondIncluded at pre-training, post-training (i.e. immediately after training), and 3-months post-trainingA 10-item measure that taps respondents' confidence in their competence to respond to and help people experiencing mental health problems (i.e., Confidence in Recognizing, Intervening and Connecting Individual(s) with Resources Scale). Each response option has a possible range of 1 (Not at all confident) to 5 (Very confident), and a mean score will be calculated from all 10 items to yield a scale with a possible range of 1 to 5. Higher values indicate greater perceived competence respond to and help people experiencing mental health problems.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Satisfaction With TrainingPost-training (i.e. immediately after training)One item administered immediately post-training asking about satisfaction with training (from 1 (very dissatisfied) to 7 (very satisfied)), with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction.
Intended Use of First Face Learnings in Professional LifePost-training (i.e. immediately after training)Participants will report how likely they are to use the First Face training in the professional life on a 4-point scale from Not at all to To a great extent.
Use of First Face Learnings3-months post-trainingYes/no measure assessing whether participants used their training at all (in either personal or professional life) in the 3 months following training.
Intended Use of First Face Learnings in Personal LifePost-training (i.e. immediately after training)Participants will report how likely they are to use the First Face training in the personal life on a 4-point scale from Not at all to To a great extent.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Pre- and post-training data were collected in April and December, 2024. During 2024, the Healing Lodge employed 107 unique staff members. All were instructed that they were required to complete a First Face training. In total, 102 employees (95.3% of the year-round total) completed the First Face training. Not all trainees enrolled in the study. A total of 92 trainees in the study. Follow-up data were collected until April, 2025.

Pre-assignment details

All participants were assigned to complete the First Face training; there was no comparison group.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Healing Lodge First Face Training Evaluation Study
All participants in this evaluation will be assigned to the First Face for Mental Health training condition. The investigators will use a pre-post design to measure change in relevant outcomes from pre-training, to post-training, to 3-months post-training.
92
Total92

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicHealing Lodge First Face Training Evaluation Study
Age, Customized
Age
0 Participants
Department
Administration
13 Participants
Department
Behavioral health
44 Participants
Department
Maintenance
6 Participants
Department
Medical
5 Participants
Department
Mental health
4 Participants
Department
Missing
4 Participants
Department
Programs and support services
16 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Tribal membership
Enrolled in or descended from a federally-recognized Tribe
32 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Tribal membership
Not enrolled in or descended from a federally-recognized Tribe
60 Participants
Reside on a reservation
Do not reside on a reservation
92 Participants
Reside on a reservation
Reside on a reservation
0 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Gender
Another description
4 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Gender
Man
41 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Gender
Woman
47 Participants
Years working with at-risk youth8.23 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.98

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 90
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 90
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 90

Outcome results

Primary

Attitudes Towards Serious Mental Illness - Adolescent Version

The Attitudes Towards Serious Mental Illness - Adolescent Version (ATSMI-AV) is a validated 21-item self-report scale designed to measure attitudes towards mental illness. Participants respond on a 5-point Likert scale. The scale measures five aspects of mental health attitudes: threat, social construction/concern, wishful thinking, categorical thinking and out of control. The investigators will calculate an overall score as well as factor-specific scores, if they observe adequate internal reliability. Each item has response categories ranging from Completely disagree (coded as 1) to Completely agree (coded as 5), and a mean of all 21 items is calculated to create the scale. The scale has a possible range of 1 to 5 Higher scores indicate higher levels of stigma towards mental illness.

Time frame: Included at pre-training, post-training (i.e. immediately after training), and 3-months post-training

Population: Some missing data, some participants lost to attrition.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Healing Lodge First Face Training Evaluation StudyAttitudes Towards Serious Mental Illness - Adolescent VersionPre-training2.05 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.11
Healing Lodge First Face Training Evaluation StudyAttitudes Towards Serious Mental Illness - Adolescent VersionPost-training1.94 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.1
Healing Lodge First Face Training Evaluation StudyAttitudes Towards Serious Mental Illness - Adolescent Version3-month follow-up1.96 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.11
Primary

First Face Knowledge Assessment

This is a 12-question quiz testing participants' knowledge of concepts taught in the First Face training. Some questions offer the opportunity to earn more than one point. The investigators will score each response as correct or incorrect and sum scores (possible range = 0-17) on each occasion. Higher scores indicate better knowledge of First Face concepts.

Time frame: Included at pre-training, post-training (i.e. immediately after training), and 3-months post-training

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Healing Lodge First Face Training Evaluation StudyFirst Face Knowledge Assessment3-month follow-up12.26 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.58
Healing Lodge First Face Training Evaluation StudyFirst Face Knowledge AssessmentPre-training9.18 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.42
Healing Lodge First Face Training Evaluation StudyFirst Face Knowledge AssessmentPost-training13.04 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.53
Primary

Perceived Competence to Respond

A 10-item measure that taps respondents' confidence in their competence to respond to and help people experiencing mental health problems (i.e., Confidence in Recognizing, Intervening and Connecting Individual(s) with Resources Scale). Each response option has a possible range of 1 (Not at all confident) to 5 (Very confident), and a mean score will be calculated from all 10 items to yield a scale with a possible range of 1 to 5. Higher values indicate greater perceived competence respond to and help people experiencing mental health problems.

Time frame: Included at pre-training, post-training (i.e. immediately after training), and 3-months post-training

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Healing Lodge First Face Training Evaluation StudyPerceived Competence to RespondPre-training4.17 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.14
Healing Lodge First Face Training Evaluation StudyPerceived Competence to RespondPost-training4.44 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
Healing Lodge First Face Training Evaluation StudyPerceived Competence to Respond3-month follow-up4.28 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.13
Secondary

Intended Use of First Face Learnings in Personal Life

Participants will report how likely they are to use the First Face training in the personal life on a 4-point scale from Not at all to To a great extent.

Time frame: Post-training (i.e. immediately after training)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Healing Lodge First Face Training Evaluation StudyIntended Use of First Face Learnings in Personal LifeMissing4 Participants
Healing Lodge First Face Training Evaluation StudyIntended Use of First Face Learnings in Personal LifeSomewhat28 Participants
Healing Lodge First Face Training Evaluation StudyIntended Use of First Face Learnings in Personal LifeTo a great extent58 Participants
Healing Lodge First Face Training Evaluation StudyIntended Use of First Face Learnings in Personal LifeVery little0 Participants
Healing Lodge First Face Training Evaluation StudyIntended Use of First Face Learnings in Personal LifeNot at all0 Participants
Secondary

Intended Use of First Face Learnings in Professional Life

Participants will report how likely they are to use the First Face training in the professional life on a 4-point scale from Not at all to To a great extent.

Time frame: Post-training (i.e. immediately after training)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Healing Lodge First Face Training Evaluation StudyIntended Use of First Face Learnings in Professional LifeMissing5 Participants
Healing Lodge First Face Training Evaluation StudyIntended Use of First Face Learnings in Professional LifeSomewhat21 Participants
Healing Lodge First Face Training Evaluation StudyIntended Use of First Face Learnings in Professional LifeTo a great extent62 Participants
Healing Lodge First Face Training Evaluation StudyIntended Use of First Face Learnings in Professional LifeVery little2 Participants
Healing Lodge First Face Training Evaluation StudyIntended Use of First Face Learnings in Professional LifeNot at all0 Participants
Secondary

Satisfaction With Training

One item administered immediately post-training asking about satisfaction with training (from 1 (very dissatisfied) to 7 (very satisfied)), with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction.

Time frame: Post-training (i.e. immediately after training)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Healing Lodge First Face Training Evaluation StudySatisfaction With Training2.92 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.98
Secondary

Use of First Face Learnings

Yes/no measure assessing whether participants used their training at all (in either personal or professional life) in the 3 months following training.

Time frame: 3-months post-training

Population: Some missing data

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Healing Lodge First Face Training Evaluation StudyUse of First Face LearningsMissing1 Participants
Healing Lodge First Face Training Evaluation StudyUse of First Face LearningsYes-used training37 Participants
Healing Lodge First Face Training Evaluation StudyUse of First Face LearningsNo - did not use training9 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026