Skip to content

Effects of rTMS on Respiratory Function and Gut Microbiota in Patients With Brain Injury

Effects of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation(rTMS) on Respiratory Function and Gut Microbiota in Patients With Brain Injury

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06288984
Enrollment
74
Registered
2024-03-01
Start date
2024-03-01
Completion date
2026-12-31
Last updated
2024-03-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Brain Injuries, Gut Microbiota, Respiratory Function Impaired

Brief summary

Impaired respiratory function may occur after brain injury, and will progress to restricted respiratory dysfunction without early intervention. At present, there is a lack of effective treatment options for respiratory dysfunction. Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation(rTMS) is a non-invasive, painless and non-invasive neuroregulatory technique. In healthy people, rTMS applied to the respiratory motor cortex induces a contralateral respiratory muscle response. However, whether rTMS can improve respiratory function in patients with brain injury remains unclear. gut microbiota can affect muscle function and mass, and animal experiments have shown that probiotics can increase skeletal muscle mass and grip strength in mice. On the other hand, studies have found that rTMS can improve the nutritional status of patients with vegetative state by regulating the structure of gut microbiota. However, it remains unclear whether rTMS can improve respiratory muscle function in patients with brain injury by regulating gut microbiota. Therefore, the investigators intend to apply rTMS to the respiratory motor cortex to observe whether rTMS can improve respiratory function and reduce the incidence of pneumonia in patients with brain injury, and to observe the role of gut microbiota in this process.

Interventions

DEVICEactive rTMS

The magnetic stimulation coil was tangent to the scalp and kept parallel for 10 minutes a day, 5 days a week for 4 weeks

DEVICEsham rTMS

The magnetic stimulation coil was tangent to the scalp and kept perpendicular for 10 minutes a day, 5 days a week for 4 weeks

Sponsors

Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* In line with the diagnostic criteria of Chinese classification of cerebrovascular diseases(2015) mRS Score 2-4 points or craniocerebral injury caused by trauma, GCS score \> 8 points * Between 18 and 70 years old * The first incidence of cerebrovascular disease or traumatic brain injury, and the course of disease was 10-180 days * Vital signs are stable, no progression * Voluntary participation with informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with a history of respiratory disease, including chronic bronchitis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, bronchiectasis, and lung cancer * Severe bone malformations in the chest or spine * Have other neurological or neuromuscular disorders * History of thoracic and abdominal surgery * Severe heart, lung, kidney, liver or other organ dysfunction * Pregnant and lactating women * Epilepsy * Metal implant * Patients who were judged by the investigator to be unsuitable for participation in this trial

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Diaphragm thicknessDay 0,Week 4Diaphragm thickness was measured using a 10-15 MHz linear array probe, and the probe was positioned in the 8th to 11th costal space between the midaxillary line or anterior axillary line, perpendicular to the skin at the end of inspiratory phase and the end of expiratory phase.
Thickening fractionDay 0,Week 4Thickening fraction = (end-inspiratory diaphragm thickness-end expiratory

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Diaphragm mobilityDay 0,Week 4Diaphragm mobility was measured with a 2-5MHz convex array probe, which was located below the costal arch of the midline of the clavicle. The above indexes were measured for 3 consecutive respiratory cycles and averaged.
Forced expiratory volume at one second(FEV1)Day 0,Week 4The FEV1 is measured using an Master-Screen spirometer
Forced vital capacity(FVC)Day 0,Week 4The FVC is measured using an Master-Screen spirometer
Maximum voluntary ventilation (MVV)Day 0,Week 4The MVV is measured using an Master-Screen spirometer
Peak expiratory flow (PEF)Day 0,Week 4The PEF is measured using an Master-Screen spirometer
Surface EMG of diaphragmDay 0,Week 4The latency period, amplitude and motion threshold were determined by Transcranial magnetic stimulation of motor evoked potential(TMS-MEP).

Contacts

Primary ContactJimin Zhang
JiminZhang1@126.com02061642065
Backup ContactGang Liu
13580350999@126.com02061642061

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026