Skip to content

Cardioneuroablation for Bradyarrhythmia

Cardioneuroablation for Bradyarrhythmia (Sinus Node and Atrioventricular Node Dysfunction): a Sham-controlled Randomised Multicentre Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06288633
Acronym
CARDIOBOOST
Enrollment
106
Registered
2024-03-01
Start date
2024-03-04
Completion date
2027-02-01
Last updated
2024-03-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bradycardia, Sick Sinus Syndrome, Syncope

Keywords

bradycardia, cardioneuroablation, sinus node dysfunction, atrioventricular node dysfunction

Brief summary

This is a multicenter prospective randomized blind controlled trial with a sham procedure group of the efficacy and safety of cardioneuroablation as a method of treating symptomatic bradycardia without a permanent pacemaker implantation

Detailed description

Catheter ablation is a common treatment for cardiac arrhythmias. Some patients with AF ablation or AVNRT experience acceleration of sinus rhythm, the most likely cause of which is modification of autonomic tone caused by inadvertent damage to intramural autonomic ganglia and fibers. Intentional damage to these plexuses has become known as cardioneuroablation (CNA) and is currently used in patients with tachycardia-bradycardia syndrome, vegetatively caused sinus node dysfunction and atrioventricular conduction disorders, vasovagal syncopal conditions developing in a cardioinhibitory type. It is suggested that in some patients CNA may become an alternative to permanent pacemaker for the treatment of symptomatic bradyarrhythmias. This is a multicentre randomised clinical study evaluating the efficacy of cardioneuroablation for severe bradycardia due to sinus node dysfunction and/or atrioventricular nide dysfunction versus a sham procedure.

Interventions

Through access in the femoral vein, a mapping or ablation-mapping catheter is inserted into the right atrium, and a three-dimensional reconstruction of the right atrium is performed using an electroanatomic mapping system. The inferior and superior vena cava, the coronary sinus are indicated. Then a transeptal puncture is performed using a transeptal introducer and a needle for transeptal puncture under fluoroscopic control. A three-dimensional reconstruction of the left atrium is performed using an electroanatomic mapping system. During or immediately after the creation of three-dimensional maps of both atria, areas of the typical concentration of ganglion plexuses (GP) are ablated using radiofrequency applications (30-50 Watts, 10-40 s each point). Ablated points are annotated on the three-dimensional map. GPs ablation zones are about 0.5 x 1.0 cm in size.

Through access in the femoral vein, a diagnostic catheter is inserted in the area of the coronary sinus under fluoroscopic control. The effective refractory period (ERP) of the atria will be measured according to the method adopted in clinical practice, namely: using a ten-pole diagnostic electrode installed in the coronary sinus, a series of eight electrical pulses with the same amplitude and frequency is applied to the atrial myocardium. Then the ninth pulse is applied with a gradual decrease in the time interval until the absence of an atrial myocardium response to the pulse is registered. The cycle of an additional, ninth pulse, in which the atrial myocardium did not respond to an electrical impulse, is considered an atrial ERP.

Sponsors

Meshalkin National Medical Research Center, Ministry of Health of Russian Federation
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
The Federal Centre of Cardiovascular Surgery, Russia
CollaboratorOTHER
Clinical City Hospital named after I.V. Davydovsky of Moscow Department of Healthcare
CollaboratorNETWORK
City Clinical Hospital No.52 of Moscow Healthcare Department
CollaboratorOTHER
National Medical Research Center for Therapy and Preventive Medicine
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Medical Centre Hospital of the President's Affairs Administration, Republic of Kazakhstan
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Tomsk National Research Medical Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences
CollaboratorOTHER
Vishnevsky Center of Surgery
CollaboratorOTHER
National Medical Research Center for Cardiology, Ministry of Health of Russian Federation
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Federal State Budgetary Institution, V. A. Almazov Federal North-West Medical Research Centre, of the Ministry of Health
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Any of the following variants of bradyarrhythmia in patients aged 18-65 years: (1.1.) Symptomatic sinus bradycardia or bradycardia due to atrioventricular blockade, including transient. (1.2.) Severe asymptomatic sinus bradycardia with a rhythm frequency of \<30 beats/min. (1.3.) Transient atrioventricular block of II-III degree or permanent block of II degree. (1.4.) Repeated fainting or pre-fainting states with a proven association with bradycardia (without injury). (1.5.) Rhythm pauses \>6 seconds. In combination with the following two criteria: 2. Positive reaction to physical activity and/or atropine test: (2.1.) Increase in sinus rhythm frequency ≥25% or \>90 beats/min. (2.2.) The transition of atrioventricular blockade of the II-III degree to the 1st degree or complete normalization of atrioventricular conduction at the sinus rhythm. 3. Sinus rhythm at the time of switching on

Exclusion criteria

1. Anamnesis of injury during syncopation due to bradycardia, except in the case when the patient refused to implant an electrocardiostimulator for his own reasons in writing; 2. Constant intake of antiarrhythmic drugs (for PVC, AF, etc.); 3. The presence of an implanted pacemaker, a heart contractility modulation device, a cardioverter defibrillator; 4. Drug-induced sinus bradycardia and/or atrioventricular block; 5. Bradycardia due to electrolyte imbalance (e.g. hyperkalemia); 6. Bradycardia due to hypothyroidism or other reversible conditions; 7. No reaction to the administration of atropine (up to a maximum dose of 0.2 mg / kg); 8. Proven association of bradyarrhythmia with episodes of apnea/hypopnea in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome; 9. Clinically significant coronary artery disease; 10. Postinfarction cardiosclerosis; 11. Hemodynamically significant congenital heart defects, including operated ones; 12. Stroke or transient ischemic attack \<3 months; 13. Open heart surgery in the anamnesis; 14. Catheter interventions on coronary arteries or for cardiac arrhythmias \<3 days; 15. Conditions after percutaneous coronary angioplasty \<3 months; 16. Anamnesis of stable ventricular tachycardia on the background of bradycardia; 17. Pregnancy or breastfeeding period

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Implantation of a permanent cardiac pacemaker12 months post procedureOnce there is a recurrence of documented symptomatic bradycardia, a permanent pacemaker implantation is considered

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Presence of symptomatic or asymptomatic rhythm pauses >6 seconds12 months post procedureAs detected by ECG monitoring
The presence of symptomatic or asymptomatic sinus bradycardia with an average heart rate <40 beats/min in the daytime12 months post procedureAs detected by ECG monitoring
Transient or permanent atrioventricular block12 months post procedureAs detected by ECG monitoring
Complications of cardioneuroablation30 days post procedureCardiac tamponade, pericardial effusion \>10 mm, esophageal damage, stroke or transient ischemic event, severe groin hematoma (hemoglobin level drop \>20%), atriovenous fistula in the groin
Sinus tachycardia after cardioneuroablation30 days post procedureAs detected by ECG monitoring, defined as daytime mean heart rate \>100 bpm
Implantation of a pacemaker by 24 months after randomization24 months post procedureOnce there is a recurrence of documented symptomatic bradycardia, a permanent pacemaker implantation is considered
Orthostatic hypotension and/or bradycardia during passive orthostasis test12 months post procedureTilt-testing

Countries

Russia

Contacts

Primary ContactAleksandr Vakhrushev, PhD
advakhrushev@gmail.com+78127023749
Backup ContactEvgeny Mikhaylov, PhD, Prof.
mikhaylov_en@almazovcentre.ru+78127023749

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026