Skip to content

Comparison of Total Tubeless Mini-PCNL Versus Tubeless Mini-PCNL

Comparison of Total Tubeless Mini-PCNL Versus Tubeless Mini-PCNL : A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06288022
Enrollment
130
Registered
2024-03-01
Start date
2024-04-01
Completion date
2026-06-30
Last updated
2024-03-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Nephrolithiasis Staghorn Calculus, Safety Issues, Surgery-Complications

Keywords

total tubeless PCNL, complication, safety, tubeless PCNL

Brief summary

Limited literature has focused on the use of totally tubeless mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (Mini-PCNL) for the treatment of large renal stones. This Randomized Controlled trial aims to compare complication and safety of Mini-PCNL between total tubeless and tubeless Mini-PCNL.

Detailed description

After being informed about study and potential risks, all patient giving written informed consent with undergo a mini-PCNL operation. Patient who meet the eligibility requirements will be randomized in a single-blind manner (patient) in a 1:1 ratio to total tubeless mini-PCNL or tubeless mini-PCNL.

Interventions

OTHERtotal tubeless mini-PCNL

When finish the mini-PCNL operation, patient not receive placement both ureteral drainage tube (DJ-stent) and nephrostomy tube.

OTHERtubeless mini-PCNL

When finish the mini-PCNL operation, patient receive placement ureteral drainage tube (DJ-stent) but not receive nephrostomy tube.

Sponsors

Mahidol University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Caregiver)

Masking description

All eligible patients will be provided with an explanation of the research and invited to participate. Patient will participate or not depends on whether they not meet the surgical exclusion criteria. If they meet the criteria, they will not participate in the research. If they not meet the criteria, they will be randomly assigned to one of the groups. Patients will not be informed of the treatment intervention in advance

Intervention model description

Randomized Controlled Trial in 2 group 1. total tubeless mini-PCNL 2. tubeless mini-PCNL

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients diagnosed with kidney stones with a size ranging from 20 to 40 millimeters. * Patients have undergone mini-PCNL, unilateral * Absence of urinary tract infections before surgery. * No urological congenital abnormality * No coagulopathy

Exclusion criteria

* Presence of residual stones after the surgery, fragments larger than 4 millimeters. * Patients with a single functioning kidney * Complicated cases, including: 1. massive bleeding in the upper tract during surgery 2. Severe collecting systems injury during surgery 3. Severe UPJ mucosa swelling considered unsafe by the physician, requiring the placement of a DJ stent or nephostomy tube * Participants who decline or request withdrawal from the research study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
incidence of complications between total tubeless mini-pcnl and tubeless mini-PCNLfrom post operative day 0 to day 45The main objective is to study the incidence of complications between total tubeless mini-pcnl and tubeless mini-PCNL

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The secondary objective is to assess the surgical outcomes between total tubeless mini-pcnl and tubeless mini-PCNLfrom post operative day 0 to day 45surgical outcomes such as bleeding, post operative pain, length of hospital stay, stone free rate.

Countries

Thailand

Contacts

Primary ContactTHANAKORN SIRAJARUS
thanakorn.sjr@gmail.com086-599-3259
Backup ContactChinnakhet Ketsuwan
chinnakhet.ket@mahidol.ac.th086-345-6901

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026