Skip to content

Effect of Early Implementation of Prone Positioning

Effect of Early Implementation of Prone Positioning Among Critically Ill Patients Admitted With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome During the COVID-19 Time: A Comparative Retrospective Observational Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06287554
Acronym
prone
Enrollment
70
Registered
2024-03-01
Start date
2020-03-04
Completion date
2022-04-20
Last updated
2024-03-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome

Keywords

Prone, Lung protective, ARDS, APACHI II, SOFA

Brief summary

Background and objective: The ramifications of early lung protective measures and prone positioning on the ICU length of stay rates of participants admitted to the ICU with acute respiratory distress syndrome amid the COVID-19 pandemic constitute a pivotal examination. The study aims to identify the effect of early prone positioning on the length of stay, discharge rate, and number of tracheostomized patients in the ICU.

Detailed description

Background and objective: The ramifications of early lung protective measures and prone positioning on the ICU length of stay rates of participants admitted to the ICU with acute respiratory distress syndrome amid the COVID-19 pandemic constitute a pivotal examination. The study aims to identify the effect of early prone positioning on the length of stay, discharge rate, and number of tracheostomized patients in the ICU. Methodology: This retrospective study was conducted on critically ill patients needing mechanical ventilation with lung protective strategy and admitted to the Intensive Care Units of Al-Azhar University Hospitals between March 2020 to April 2022. All patients in the study were interpreted retrospectively by examining the patient's records. Group A (n:39) included patients who had been early placed in prone positions within 24 hours of intubation, and Group B (n:31) included patients who had not been placed in prone positions. All patients received a lung protective strategy for ARDS. In both groups, PaO2, PaCo2, PH, SpO2, and PaO2/FiO2 ratio were checked initially and later every 24 hours for 6 days. All patients were evaluated for the total days of both hospital and ICU length of stay, number of successful discharges to home from the hospital, and the total number of tracheostomized patients.

Interventions

OTHERPRONE POSITION

early placed in prone positions within 24 hours of intubation

Sponsors

Al-Azhar University
CollaboratorOTHER
Zulekha Hospitals
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
OTHER

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* All patients of both sexes. * Aged from 18 to 70 years. * Body Mass Index (BMI) from 25 to 35 kg/m2. * Critically ill due to ARDS resulting from COVID-19 pneumonia.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients who spent more than 24 hours on mechanical ventilators before enrolment in the study. * Patients who died within the first 24 hours of presentation. * Patients with advanced cancer. * Pregnant patients.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of discharged patients26 MONTHSNumber of discharged patients

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The total length of stay26 MONTHSThe total length of stay
ICU length of stay26 MONTHSICU length of stay
Patients who underwent tracheostomy procedures26 MONTHSPatients who underwent tracheostomy procedures

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026