Skip to content

Effect of Different Fixed Lingual Retainers on Tooth Stability

Effect of Different Fixed Lingual Retainers on Tooth Stability

Status
Withdrawn
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06284499
Enrollment
0
Registered
2024-02-29
Start date
2020-01-16
Completion date
2023-10-13
Last updated
2024-02-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Effect of Lingual Retainers on Tooth Stability

Keywords

Mobility, Lingual Retainer, Retention, Periotest®

Brief summary

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the effect of different fixed lingual retainers (LRs) on tooth stability after orthodontic treatment using a Periotest® device. Materials and methods: A total of 82 patients (43 females and 39 males; mean age = 18.61 ± 3.71 years) with no missing teeth in the lower inter-canine region were treated with fixed orthodontic mechanics. At the completion of the orthodontic treatment, each patient was fitted with either Ortho FlexTech (Reliance; Group I), dead soft 8-braided (Bond-A-Braid, Reliance; Group II), or 5-stranded (PentaOne, Masel; Group III) LR wire. A control group consisting of people with a healthy periodontal condition and no bone loss was included (Control; Group C). The mobility of the lower anterior teeth on the right and left sides was measured using a Periotest® device before (T0), immediately after (T1), and 10 months after (T2) the application of the LR. Statistical analyses were performed using one-way ANOVA followed by post hoc LSD, repeated ANOVA with Bonferroni post hoc test, and Pearson χ2 tests.

Interventions

OTHERmeasuring tooth stability after orthodontic treatment using a Periotest® device.

The tooth mobility was determined by taking three repeat measurements from each tooth and calculating the average of these measurements, using a Periotest® device.

Sponsors

Mustafa Kemal University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_CROSSOVER
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
14 Years to 20 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Successful completion of orthodontic treatment with optimum oral hygiene * A duration of orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances of more than 12 months * No missing teeth, restorations, or morphological crown anomalies * No radiological alveolar bone loss in the mandibular inter-canine region.

Exclusion criteria

* Individuals with periodontal problems, such as gingival bleeding and recession, parafunctional habits (e.g., clenching and grinding), * Any radiological pathology around the lower anterior teeth

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Assessment of tooth stability after orthodontic lingual retainer wire application using periotest deviceUp to 10 monthsTooth mobility measured just before and after lingual retainer wire application

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026