Skip to content

Lower Silesia Culotte Bifurcation Registry (LSCBR).

Double Kissing (DK) vs Culotte Culotte. Lower Silesia Culotte Bifurcation Registry (LSCBR).

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06284057
Acronym
LSCBR
Enrollment
400
Registered
2024-02-28
Start date
2013-04-01
Completion date
2028-04-01
Last updated
2024-03-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Efficacy, Self, Safety Issues

Keywords

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), Bifurcation lesion, Culotte Technique, Double Kiss Culotte Technique, Acute Coronary Syndrome, Two-Stent Technique

Brief summary

The study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of bifurcation PCI using two techniques (Culotte vs. DK-Culotte) using data from a retrospective analysis.

Detailed description

The study contains a retrospective analysis of subjects who have undergone PCI in two high-volume cooperative Cardiac Departments in the Lower Silesia Region (Poland) between April 2012 and January 2024. Data regarding all performed PCI from these periods were prescreened in terms of bifurcation lesion with subsequent implantation of two stents using the Culotte technique or the DK-Culotte technique. The indication for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was based either on a judgment made by the Heart Team or on a particular clinical indication (ongoing ischemia, lack of will for the alternative treatment options, presence of significant angiographic CAD suitable for PCI due to ESC/ESH recommendation). The decision to perform the two-stent technique PCI was left to the operator's dissertation based on clinical and angiographical features. All patients were thoroughly informed about all therapeutic options and PCI-related risks before providing written informed consent for the procedure. There were no clinical or vessel-related exclusion criteria (lesion anatomy, length, tortuosity, severity). However, patients who had undergone PCI with coronary stents prior to the index procedure with respect to the bifurcation lesion studied were excluded from the study.

Interventions

PROCEDUREBifurcation PCI with two stent technique Culotte Technique or Double Kiss (DK) Culotte

Patient with CAD and coexisting bifurcation lesion requiring two-stent approach treated with Culotte Technique or Double Kiss (DK) Culotte due to operator distraction.

Sponsors

Department of Cardiology, Provincial Specialized Hospital in Legnica, 59-200 Legnica, Poland.
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Regional Cardiology Center, The Copper Health Centre (MCZ),
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

* Presence of significant changes in the coronary bifurcation requiring the implantation of two coronary stents using the Culotte or DK Culotte technique.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients who underwent PCI with coronary stents prior to the index procedure for the bifurcation lesion studied.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Target lesion failure (TLF)Final assessment - 5 years after the initial hospitalization; followed by evaluation every 6 months from the end of the hospitalization until the final assessment (5 years)The primary endpoint was target lesion failure (TLF): the composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction (TVMI), or clinically driven TLR.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
MACEFinal assessment - 5 years after the initial hospitalization; followed by evaluation every 6 months from the end of the hospitalization until the final assessment (5 years)The secondary composed outcome was MACE: myocardial infarction (MI), cardiac death, MB-TLR or/and SB-TLR

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Stent thrombosisFinal assessment - 5 years after the initial hospitalization; followed by evaluation every 6 months from the end of the hospitalization until the final assessment (5 years)Stent thrombosis in a stent implanted in a bifurcation during primary intervention. Stent thrombosis was defined according to The Academic Research Consortium-2 consensus document. The presence of a thrombus† that originates in the stent/scaffold or in the segment 5 mm proximal or distal to the stent/scaffold or in a side branch originating from the stented/scaffolded segment and the presence of at least 1 of the following criteria: 1)Acute onset of ischemic symptoms at rest 2)New electrocardiographic changes suggestive of acute ischemia 3)Typical rise and fall in cardiac biomarkers (refer to definition of spontaneous myocardial infarction) or Pathological confirmation of stent/scaffold thrombosis
Stent restenosisFinal assessment - 5 years after the initial hospitalization; followed by evaluation every 6 months from the end of the hospitalization until the final assessment (5 years)Stent restenosis in a stent placed in a bifurcation during primary intervention. Stent restenosis should be confirmed by either angiography or intravascular assessment.

Countries

Poland

Contacts

Primary ContactMateusz Barycki, MD
mateusz.barycki@gmail.com+48767211446
Backup ContactAdrian Włodarczak, Assoc. Prof.
adrian.wlodarczak@gmail.com+48768460300

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026