Skip to content

Effect of Progressive Muscle Relaxation Exercises Versus Pilates Exercises on Postnatal Low Back Pain

Effect of Progressive Muscle Relaxation Exercises Versus Pilates Exercises on Postnatal Low Back Pain

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06284018
Enrollment
60
Registered
2024-02-28
Start date
2024-02-24
Completion date
2024-06-15
Last updated
2024-07-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Low Back Pain

Keywords

Progressive muscle relaxation exercises, Pilate's exercises, Low back pain., post natal period, relaxation exercises

Brief summary

This study was conducted to compare between the effect of progressive muscle relaxation exercises and the effect of pilates exercises on postnatal low back pain

Detailed description

Ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Board of the Faculty of Physical Therapy, Cairo University, before starting this study \[No: P.T.REC/012/003885\]. The study's protocol was explained in detail to each woman who signed an informed consent form before starting this study. This work adhered to the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki for the ethical conduct of research involving human subjects. It was carried out from June till September 2023 Sample Size Calculation: Based on a pilot study, sample size was calculated according to the significant difference in the value of mean difference (pretreatments - post treatment values) of pain pressure algometer between progressive muscle relaxation exercises (2.01 ± 0.39) and pilates exercises (2.90 ± 0.24) groups in unpaired t test, with α=0.05, power of 80%, and an effect size of 0.74. So a sample size of 30 patients/per group would be required and increased to 35 women to allow for a 15% dropout rate (GPower 301 http:www.psycho.uni-duesseldorf.de) Randomization of sample selection was achieved using closed envelop way. Classification of the sample by simple random way into two groups equal in number, by using sixty closed envelop, each thirty envelop contained a name of a group from the two groups (Group A) or (Group B) and asking each woman to choose one envelop from them, each woman attended to the group according the name of the group written in her envelop. After randomization, they were divided into two groups equal in number

Interventions

* Focus on the targeted muscle group. * Take a slow, deep breath while squeezing on muscle group as hard as she can (not to the point of strain). Keep the muscle tensed for 5 seconds. Hands and arms, forehead ,Eyes and Cheek, Mouth and Jaw , Neck and Shoulder ,Stomach , Leg and Toes

OTHERPilates Exercises

Pilates exercise program consisted of floor exercises on a rubber mat, including the following exercises: a- Pelvic Curl. b- Single-Leg Lift. c- Chest Lift. d- Supine Spine Twist. e- Basic Back Extension.

Sponsors

Cairo University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

intervention The design of the study was randomized controlled study. The patients were divided randomly into two equal groups (A&B). Group A consisted of thirty postnatal women. They were treated by progressive muscle relaxation exercises three times per week for 4 weeks. Group B consisted of thirty postnatal women. They were treated by pilates exercises three times per week for 4 weeks.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
25 Years to 35 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* ages were ranged from 25 to 35 years old and their body mass index (BMI) did not exceed 30kg/m2. They were postnatal by three months. The number of parity of all women was ranged from (1-3) times.

Exclusion criteria

* previous trauma to the spine, pelvis and lower limbs, * previous history of spinal surgery (such as spinal fusion surgery, vertebroplasty, or - --kyphoplasty), congenital spinal deformities, history of spinal tumors, ankylosing spondylitis, osteoporosis other spondyloarthritis

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pressure Algometerperiod of treatment was 4 weeksAssessment of pressure pain thresholds is a valid and reliable clinical tool to evaluate the subjective perception of pain in response to application of pressure in low back pain patient. Pressure algometry is used in manual therapy to objectively quantify the pressure pain thresholds and it was shown that a predictable variation exists across various spinal levels from cervical to lumbar levels. The examiner determined the main 4 points of assessment (5 cm lateral to the spinous process of L3 and L5 bilaterally), the force of PA was gradually increased at a rate of 1 kg/s, by silently counting seconds while increasing pressure, then the patient was asked to tell the examiner when the pressure became painful while the examiner applied the pressure on the assessment points

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Oswestry Disability Indexperiod of treatment was 4 weeksODI (P) is a reliable and valid instrument for measurement of disability related to low back pain in Punjabi population. It can be used both in research and clinical care settings in future Sandal, D., \[12\] . The 10 factors which constitute the ODI criteria for assessing patients' functional impairment are pain intensity, ease of personal care, lifting, working, sitting, standing, sleeping, sex life, social life and travelling. Each of the 10 questions was scored from 0 to 5, giving a maximum score of 50. The total score is then converted into a percentage by multiplying it by 2. Scores are stratified into severity: * 0-4: No disability * 5-14: Mild disability * 15-24: Moderate disability * 25-34: Severe disability * 35-50: Completely disabled

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026