Skip to content

What Are the Determinants for RTW After SA

What Are the Determinants for Return to Work After Shoulder Arthroplasty

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06281574
Acronym
RTW after SA
Enrollment
122
Registered
2024-02-28
Start date
2024-02-13
Completion date
2025-03-27
Last updated
2025-07-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Shoulder Arthroplasty

Brief summary

Shoulder arthroplasty is becoming increasingly common, due to ageing of the population. Historically, surgeons have been reluctant to use a shoulder replacement in younger patients. During the last decades however, there was an improvement of surgical techniques and implants which resulted in the fact that these procedures are nowadays more frequently used in younger patients. Combined with the increasing life expectancy and the increased age of retirement, both elderly and younger patients hope to continue their jobs after prosthetic replacement. Recent literature shows that the majority patients is able to resume their work following shoulder arthroplasty. This study aims to analyze the RTW percentage in a Belgian cohort of patients with a shoulder replacement. This study hopes to identify factors that might influence the RTW.

Detailed description

Shoulder arthroplasty is becoming increasingly common, due to ageing of the population. Historically, surgeons have been reluctant to use a shoulder replacement in younger patients, due to the high incidence of complications and the limited longevity of the implant. Therefore, this type of surgery remained reserved for the elderly patients. During the last decades however, improvement of surgical techniques and implants have made it possible to expand the indications for anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA), humeral head hemi-arthroplasty (HHA) and reversed total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA), resulting in significant improvements in range of motion, functional outcomes, quality of life and reported pain scores. As a result, these procedures are nowadays more frequently used in younger patients. Combined with the increasing life expectancy and the increased age of retirement, both elderly and younger patients hope to continue their jobs after prosthetic replacement. Recent literature shows that the majority patients is able to resume their work following shoulder arthroplasty. This study aims to analyze the RTW percentage in a Belgian cohort of patients with a shoulder replacement. This study hopes to identify factors that might influence the RTW. An enhanced understanding of this social, medical and economic issue will enable surgeons to give more tailored advice to their patients regarding RTW after shoulder replacement surgery and accordingly reduce the economic burden on Belgian society.

Interventions

PROCEDUREQuestionnaires

To assess the shoulder function, the following questionnaires will be used: The validated Dutch translation of the Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS) The validated Dutch translation of the Simple Shoulder Test (SST) The Subjective Shoulder Value (SVV) To assess the work ability patients will use the validated Dutch work-related questionnaire for upper extremity disorders (WORQ-UP)

Sponsors

Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 63 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Current evidence suggests that no significant changes in functionality can be expected 2 years after surgery. Therefore, we will include patients who were operated between January 2010 and January 2022 at the University Hospital Leuven * Patients ≥ 18 years old and ≤ 63 years old at time of surgery * Implantation of an anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty, humeral head hemi arthroplasty or reversed shoulder arthroplasty

Exclusion criteria

* Age \< 18 and \> 63 years at time of surgery * Limited knowledge of Dutch

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Return to workBaselineCollection how many of the study participants will return to work after a shoulder arthroplasty. This question is answered with yes or no.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
WORQ-UP (work-related questionnaire for upper extremity disorders)BaselineA questionnaire used to identify self-reported difficulty performing common work-related tasks. It consists of 17 items.
SSV (Subjective Shoulder Value)BaselineQuestion to subjectively evaluate a patient's shoulder function. Which percentage do you give your shoulder. A normal shoulder is 100% and worst schoulder is 0%.
SST (Dutch translation of the Simple Shoulder Test)BaselineA questionnaire that contains 12 items to be answered by the patient independently: 2 about function related to pain, 7 about function/strength, and 3 about range of motion. Questions are answered by yes or no. A final score of 0 = worst and 12 = best. Scores are subsequently transformed by number of 'yes' items/ number of completed items x 100 = % 'yes' responses. A final score of 0= worst function and 100= best function.
Type of shoulder arthroplastyBaselineCollect how many participants received an anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA), reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) or humeral hemi-arthroplasty (HHA)
Self-made questionnaireBaselineA questionnaire where the participants is asked if they returned back to their jobs and if so how many months after surgery, what their job satisfaction is, if work-related adaptations were made by the employer to ease the return to work process, what their marital status and educational qualifications are.
Belgisch Kenniscentrum over welzijn op het werk (BeSWIC)BaselineThe participants' occupations is classified as light, medium, hard or very hard occupation
OSS (Oxford Shoulder Score)BaselineA questionnaire that contains 12 items to be answered by the patient independently. There are 5 categories of response for every question, corresponding to a score ranging from 1 to 5. Scores are combined to give a single score, with a range from 12 (best) to 60 (worst). The questions deal with pain (degree, time point) and possible handicaps in private and professional life. It is divided 20/40 corresponding to pain/activities of daily living.

Countries

Belgium

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026