Skip to content

High-intensity Versus Low-intensity Laser Acupuncture in Chronic, Non-specific Low Back Pain

High-intensity Versus Low-intensity Laser Acupuncture in Chronic, Non-specific Low Back Pain: a Double-blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06280846
Enrollment
60
Registered
2024-02-28
Start date
2024-03-15
Completion date
2024-10-30
Last updated
2024-11-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Nonspecific Low-back Pain

Keywords

low back pain, high-intensity laser acupuncture, Low-intensity laser acupuncture, peak torque, fatigue, functional disability

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to investigate the efficacy of high-intensity laser acupuncture versus low intensity laser acupuncture on peak torque of trunk extensors, fatigue of trunk extensors, back pain, ROM and function in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain (CNLBP).

Detailed description

Chronic nonspecific low back pain is a type of persistent back pain that affects people of all ages and contributes to the global disease burden (CNLBP). The major objective of treatment is to lessen pain and its aftereffects. One noninvasive, targeted light therapy for treating musculoskeletal disorders is low-intensity laser therapy (LLLT). It has analgesic, anti-inflammatory, muscle-relaxant, and tissue-repair properties. Additionally, LILT has been demonstrated to relieve generalized lower back pain. Another light therapy that is painless and noninvasive, high-intensity laser therapy (HILT), stimulates tissue while delivering analgesic, anti-inflammatory, and anti-edematous benefits. It has been demonstrated that acupuncture, a popular complementary therapy, can relieve musculoskeletal pain and increase muscle strength.To date, however, there has been limited investigation into the effects of high- versus low-intensity laser acupuncture on CNLBP. Thus, the current study will be conducted to explore the efficacy of HILT versus LILL on peak torque of trunk extensors, fatigue of trunk extensors, back pain, ROM and functional disability in patients with chronic, nonspecific low back pain.

Interventions

The patients will receive high-intensity lasers and the treatment will be performed at 15 acupuncture points: unilateral GV3, GV4, and GV5, and bilateral BL 20, BL23, BL24, BL25, BL40 and GB30. Exercise therapy program: The patients will perform an exercise therapy program in the form of: \- strengthening exercises for abdominal and back muscles, - lumbar stabilization exercises. - stretching exercises

DEVICElow-intensity laser acupuncture and Exercise therapy program

The patients will receive low-intensity lasers and the treatment will be performed at 15 acupuncture points: unilateral GV3, GV4, and GV5, and bilateral BL 20, BL23, BL24, BL25, BL40 and GB30. Exercise therapy program: The patients will perform an exercise therapy program in the form of: \- strengthening exercises for abdominal and back muscles, - lumbar stabilization exercises. - stretching exercises

DEVICESham laser acupuncture

Sham laser acupuncture and exercise therapy program. The patients will receive a sham laser.acupuncture and an exercise therapy program in the form of: - strengthening exercises for abdominal and back muscles, - lumbar stabilization exercises. - stretching exercises

Sponsors

King Khalid University
CollaboratorOTHER
Cairo University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

random generator

Intervention model description

high-intensity laser acupuncture, low-intensity laser acupuncture and exercise therapy program

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 40 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. The patients had CNSLBP with age from 20 to 40 years from both genders. 2. Patients will be referred from an orthopedist with diagnosis of chronic low back pain without underlying pathological causes. 3. The patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain more than 3months. Minimum pain intensity of 30 mm on the visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, which ranges from 0 to 100 mm. 4. Patients with normal BMI ranges between 18.5:24.9 kg/m2. 5. The study populations must be willing to participate in the study

Exclusion criteria

1. Neurological, infectious diseases and systemic illness such as rheumatologic diseases,systemic lupus erythematosus, diabetes mellitus type I or II. 2. Psychiatric/mental deficit. 3. Patients who had a previous surgical history (within 6 months) will also excluded. 4. participation in other treatment within the previous 3 month. 5. Pregnancy. 6. History of spinal fracture, tumor, osteoporosis

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Fatigueup to four weeksIsokinetic dynamometer will be used for measuring fatigue of back extensors.
peak torqueup to four weeksIsokinetic dynamometer will be used for measuring peak torque of back extensors.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain Intensityup to four weeksVisual Analogue Scale (VAS) will be used by the patient to mark his/her level of pain between 0 to100 milliliters line. Zero usually represents 'no pain at all' whereas the upper limit represents 'the worst pain ever possible'.
lumbar flexion ROM assessmentup to four weeksModified Schober test will be used to assess ROM of lumbar flexion.
Disabilityup to four weeksArabic version of Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) will be used for assessment of functional disability

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 17, 2026