Skip to content

Efficacy and Tolerability of Test Product Versus Cysteamine 5% in Treatment of Facial Epidermal Melasma

Randomized Controlled Investigator Blinded Comparative Study of the Efficacy and Tolerability of Test Product Versus Cysteamine 5% in the Treatment of Facial Epidermal Melasma Over 4 Months

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06278948
Enrollment
140
Registered
2024-02-26
Start date
2023-10-06
Completion date
2024-06-30
Last updated
2024-02-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Melasma

Keywords

facial epidermal melasma, MASI, Cysteamine 5%

Brief summary

This interventional, randomized, investigator blinded, controlled study conducted in one centre consists in a 4-month evaluation period within the same season avoiding sunny season on 140 subjects with facial epidermal melasma.

Detailed description

Melasma is a very common pigmentation disorder which significantly alters quality of life as per its high visibility on the face. The objective is to compare the efficacy and tolerability of the new depigmenting formulation that addresses the different targets of hyperpigmentation and includes an inhibitor of melanin production with a breakthrough innovative mechanism of action versus Cysteamine 5% in the acute management of melasma over 4 months. Statistics: Sample size calculation: 120 patients (60 per group) are necessary to reach the non-inferiority objective of the Test Product versus Cysteamine 5% on the modified Melasma Area and Severity Index (mMASI) change from Baseline at Month 4. To allow a rate of subjects excluded from analysis (drop out, lost to follow-up, major deviation) at Month 4, 140 subjects in total (70 per group) are enrolled. Statistical analysis: Continuous data collected at each visit will be summarized using common statistical measures such as the count of values, mean, standard deviation, median minimum and maximum. For categorical data, summaries will be provided in terms of frequency counts (n) and percentages (%).

Interventions

OTHERGroup TP

Application full face, twice daily, in the morning and at bedtime for 4 months

DRUGGroup CYS

Application short contact, of thin layer once daily at bedtime for 4 months

Sponsors

Cosmetique Active International
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Facial epidermal melasma (exclude mixed and dermal melasma) * Subjects free of excessive hair, acne, cuts, abrasions, fissures, wounds, lacerations, or any other active skin conditions on the face

Exclusion criteria

* Subjects with any other signs of significant irritation or skin disease * Subjects using oral contraceptive pills or hormonal implants as birth control measures during the study * Subjects who had a skin lightening procedure in the past 8 weeks

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
change in mMASI scoringfrom baseline to Day112the mMASI is calculated using 3 components: four regions of the face (forehead, right malar, left malar and chin); area of involvement for each region (using a scale from 0 to 6): darkness compared to the surrounding normal skin for each area (evaluated using a scale from 0 to 4).
change in Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA)from baseline to Day112The investigator evaluates the severity of melasma using a 4-point scale (from 0 (cleared, almost cleared) to 3 (severe (markedly darker than the surrounding normal skin)).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
change in Subject Global Assessment of Improvement (SGAI)from Day28 to Day112The subject evaluates the change on a 6-point scale from -1 (worsened) to 4 (totally cleared).

Countries

India

Contacts

Primary ContactMukta Sachdev
mukta.sachdev@msclinical.com+91 8041125934

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026