Bladder Injury, Complication of Surgical Procedure, Surgical Injury, Ureter Injury
Conditions
Keywords
laparoscopic hysterectomy, lower urinary tract injury, cystoscopy
Brief summary
For the evaluation of the lower urinary tract after laparoscopic hysterectomy, routine standard saline cystoscopy and carbon dioxide cystoscopy will be compared.
Detailed description
It was aimed to investigate whether routine cystoscopy with carbon dioxide is a safer and faster method for the evaluation of lower urinary tract injuries compared to standard saline cystoscopy. In addition, with this study, it will be studied whether bladder bleeding or intra-bladder masses can be evaluated more quickly and clearly.
Interventions
Using carbon dioxide medium for filling bladder
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
1. laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign reasons planned patients 2. The operation will be performed in our hospital 3. Reporting preoperative endometrial and cervical samplings as benign 4. After discharge, control examinations will be carried out in our hospital.
Exclusion criteria
1. Abdominal, robotic or vaginal hysterectomies 2. malignant reporting of preoperative cervical and endometrial samplings 3. Patients do not want to participate in the study
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| It was aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and reliability of carbon dioxide cystoscopy. | one year |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| It was aimed to evaluate the speed and image quality of carbon dioxide cystoscopy in detecting intravesical masses. | one year |
Countries
Turkey (Türkiye)