Skip to content

iLux Treatment for Meibomian Gland Dysfunction

The iLux and Mechanical Meibomian Gland Expression for the Treatment of Moderate and Severe Meibomian Gland Dysfunction.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06278584
Acronym
MGD
Enrollment
130
Registered
2024-02-26
Start date
2020-10-15
Completion date
2022-02-28
Last updated
2024-02-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Eyes Dry Chronic, Meibomian Gland Dysfunction

Keywords

Meibomian Gland Dysfunction, ILux®, ocular surface, dry eye

Brief summary

Summary: Purpose: To compare the safety and efficacy of eyelid treatment with the ILux®-MGD Treatment System in one session versus five sessions of mechanical meibomian gland expression (MMGE) in patients with moderate to severe meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD). Methods: Prospective, randomized, open-label, controlled clinical trial comparing one session of the ILux® MGD Treatment System versus five sessions of MMGE in both eyes of 130 patients aged ≥18 years with OSDI scores ≥13, total MGS of 15 in the lower lid of each eye and NI-TBUT <10 s, who were randomized 1:1 to ILux® or MMGE.

Detailed description

Meibomian glands (MG) are responsible for the secretion of lipids (meibum) into the ocular surface and have a protective role for tear film against evaporation1-4; therefore, Meibomian Gland Dysfunction (MGD) is associated with evaporative dry eye (EDE). Hyperkeratinization and hyperviscosity occur in dysfunctions with low MG expressibility, low meibum quality and eyelid margin inflammation. Finally, atrophy and dropout of MGs in some cases could appear MGD is a prevalent dry eye disorder (DED) with an estimated prevalence range between 3.5% and 70%1,10-13, it constitutes the primary underlying pathology within the EDE subtype. On top of this, MGD is chronic and progressive, so it is imperative to identify clinical approaches that can effectively target this underlying condition. Treatment of MGD often involves artificial lubricants, topical lipid supplements, lid hygiene, warm compression or heat application, supplement omega-3, topical and systemic antibiotics against Demodex mite infestation, and steroids. Mechanical management involves debridement-scaling of the line of Marx and lowers lid margin21, and other methods for mechanical manual expression in alignment with the concept that optimal treatment of MGD requires the employment of some forms of evacuating MGs contents. Eyelid thermal pulsation devices combine the application of heat at the appropriate temperature to the palpebral surface with simultaneous compression of the glands to evacuate their contents, and have been shown to improve signs and symptoms over 12 months in cases of severe meibomian obstruction. More recently, the ILux® MGD Treatment System (Alcon, FortWorth, TX, USA) is an eyelid thermal pulsation system that includes a single-use patient interface device and a portable battery-powered instrument that simultaneously applies localized heat and compression to treat MGD and showed significant improvements in MG function between one and four weeks. Prior to the introduction of vectored thermal pulsation therapies, the limitations of the practice for mechanical meibomian gland expression (MMGE) were pain caused by forced evacuation of the gland, difficulty with adequate sustained temperature at the eyelid at therapeutic levels ≥ 40°C28, and duration of effect demonstrated in only one month. In the patients five sessions per year of this combined treatment for moderate and severe DGM was performet. The aim of this study is to compare the safety and efficacy of one-session eyelid treatment with the ILux® DGM treatment device versus five sessions in MMGE consultation in patients with moderate and severe DGM in a follow-up.

Interventions

DEVICEiLUX Treatment System

Local heat using an electrical warming mask for 5 minutes.

Sponsors

Clínica de Oftalmología de Cali S.A
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age at least 18 years * A history of self-reported dry eye symptoms for two months prior to study enrollment, * Diagnosis of MGD Low delivery type, with mechanism obstructive and non- cicatricial with scores as follows: Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire ≥ 13, Non-Invasive Tear break-up time (NIBUT) lower than 10 seconds (The Sirius anterior segment analyzer (CSO, Florence, Italy). * Meibomian gland scores (MGS) lower than 15.

Exclusion criteria

* A history of ocular surgery * Allergic conjunctivitis * Seborrheic dermatitis * Rosacea * Psoriasis * Punctal plugs or previous punctal cautery * Anterior or demodex blepharitis * Cicatricial lid margin disease * Ocular injury or trauma * Chemical burns * Limbal stem cell deficiency * Active ocular infection or non-dry eye inflammation * Aqueous-deficient dry eye * Irregular cornea * Lid abnormalities and systemic disease conditions * Medications that cause dry eye.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Effectiveness defined as changes from baseline to 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months in Non Invasive Tear break-up time (NI-TBUT) in seconds.1 yearNIBUT measured by SIRIUS device in seconds.
Effectiveness defined as changes from baseline to 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months in Meibomian gland scores (MGS).1 yearUsing a Meibomian Gland Evaluator (MGE 1000) to grade a total score for 15 meibomian glands in the lower eyelid evaluated in 3 areas: nasal (5 glands), medial (5 glands), and temporal (5 glands) expressed & graded from 0 to 3 (0 = no secretion, 1 = inspissated, 2 = cloudy, 3 = clear liquid).

Countries

Colombia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026