Skip to content

Prosthetic Rehabilitation of Thin Wiry Ridge by Ridge Splitting and Simultaneous Implants Placement

Short-Term Evaluation of Prosthetic Rehabilitation of Thin Wiry Ridge by Ridge Splitting and Simultaneous Implants Placement: Non-randomized Control Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06274476
Acronym
implant
Enrollment
21
Registered
2024-02-23
Start date
2018-09-09
Completion date
2020-01-01
Last updated
2024-02-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Atrophic Maxillary Ridge and Mandibular Ridge

Keywords

implant, knife-edge ridge, ridge expansion, piezoelectric, implant-supported prosthesis, prosthetic complications

Brief summary

evaluates the success of prosthetic rehabilitation of thin wiry ridge and implants placed simultaneously in splitted ridge both clinically and radiographically.

Detailed description

twenty-one participants were enrolled of which 13 patients (8 females and 5 males) were suffering from maxillary ridge atrophy and 8 patients (5 females and 3 males) had mandibular ridge atrophy; a total of 42 implants were performed using the ridge expansion technique. The expansion was performed using the conventional disk technique, piezoelectric corticotomy, and self-threading expanders. Implants were placed and loaded with fixed partial denture after 4 months for the mandible and 6 months for the maxilla. Implant stability quotient (ISQ) was measured at T0 (implant placement) and TL (loading). Crestal bone levels were measured at different times: T0, TL, and T12 (12 months). Evaluation of prosthetic and surgical complications was carried out. Data were analyzed and compared using analysis of variance and paired t-tests at a significance level of 5%.

Interventions

OTHERimplant placement

ridge splitting piezo surgery and implant placement

Sponsors

Cairo University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
DOUBLE (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

double

Intervention model description

maxillary and mandibular atrophic ridge

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* ridge of 2 to 4 mm of initial alveolar crest width * bone height of at least 8 mm from vitastructures good oral hygiene.

Exclusion criteria

patients who smoke more than 10 cigarettes per day diabetes mellitus, osteoporosis, and periodontal disease.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
implant success12 monthimplant osseointgeration by radiographic evaluation .bone loss by mm, and bone density

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026