Skip to content

Double-dorsal Versus Single-volar Digital Block

Double-dorsal Versus Single-volar Digital Subcutaneous Anaesthetic Injection for Finger Injuries in the Emergency Department: A Randomised Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06274073
Enrollment
160
Registered
2024-02-23
Start date
2022-10-12
Completion date
2023-09-12
Last updated
2024-02-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anesthesia, Local, Laceration of Skin, Nerve Block, Pain

Keywords

Digital nerve block, Finger lacerations, Single palmar injection, Double dorsal injection, Pain

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to compare the traditional dorsal double injection digital block with the palmar single injection technique in the suturing of acute traumatic hand finger lacerations in terms of injection pain score (NRS), anesthesia onset time, and success of anesthesia. It is understood that single injection digital block and double injection digital block techniques do not have significant advantages over each other in terms of pain levels and procedure times. However, the need for rescue anesthesia was evaluated to be lower in the single injection digital block technique. This difference is especially due to measurements in the volar region incisions. According to the results of this study, we think that choosing the single injection digital block technique for volar region incisions is a more rational approach, especially in terms of the data of the need for rescue anesthesia.

Detailed description

Randomized, parallel controlled, open labeled experimental study

Interventions

PROCEDUREDorsal digital block

Dorsal regional digital block anesthesia (No drug or device is being investigated here; the two digital block procedure mentioned are compared)

PROCEDUREPalmar digital block

Palmar regional digital block anesthesia (No drug or device is being investigated here; the two digital block procedures mentioned are compared)

Sponsors

Ankara City Hospital Bilkent
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

Two parallel groups (two digital block techniques)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Between 18-65 years of age * Isolated traumatic acute hand finger lacerations requiring suturing * Admissions within 6 hours of injury * Patients who can cooperate with the NRS score * Patients who gave consent

Exclusion criteria

* Vein, nerve and tendon lacerations on the hand that require repair * Amputation or bone fracture * Those who have used analgesics in the last 12 hours * Hemodynamically unstable patients * Known allergy to prilocaine hydrochloride

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Anesthesia pain score3rd minuteNumerical rating scale (NRS): 0 to 10 (min-max); higher scores indicates more pain

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Anesthesia onset timeMeasurements are provided per 30 seconds (30-60-90-120 seconds and more if necessary)Time achieved to total anesthesia

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026