Skip to content

Assessment of the Artifical Intelligence Assisted Registration Versus Conventional Point Based Registration on Cone Beam-computed Tomography (CBCT) With Heavy Metal Artifacts

Assessment of the AI-assisted Registration Versus Conventional Point-based Registration on CBCTs With Heavy Metal Artifacts

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06273332
Enrollment
16
Registered
2024-02-22
Start date
2023-12-20
Completion date
2024-02-25
Last updated
2024-02-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Registration Accuracy

Keywords

Point-based registration, AI registration, Accuracy, Digital implant planning

Brief summary

Our study investigates the accuracy and duration needed for 3D model registration using artifical intelligence (AI) assistance compared to conventional point-based registration. Manual segmentation of all cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans will be performed before the registration procedure.

Detailed description

CBCT images and intraoral scans will be screened following specific eligibility criteria. 16 CBCT images and intraoral scans that will meet the inclusion criteria will undergo manual segmentation via 3D medical image processing software. Afterward, point-based registration and AI-assisted registration will be performed by a single operator using specialized implant planning software. Then, the registration accuracy will be examined by measuring the distances between the three-dimensional models of CBCT data and intraoral scans. Also, the duration required for registration will be calibrated and recorded by a stopwatch.

Interventions

OTHERAI-assisted registration

We will use artificial intelligence to register 3d model on intra-oral scan

OTHERPoint-based registration

We will use five references points or more to perform model registration

Sponsors

Ain Shams University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
15 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

CBCT scans for either the maxilla or mandible or both and intraoral scans or manual impressions with metal restorations.

Exclusion criteria

Scans without metal restorations.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Registration accuracyimmediately after the procedureDistance between registered 3d model and CBCT in millimeters

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Duration for registrationDuring the proceduretime taken for registration procedure

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026