Skip to content

Acupuncture for Prevention and Treatment of Oral-related Complications Caused by Radiotherapy for Head and Neck Cancer

A Single-center, Single-blind Phase II Clinical Trial of Acupuncture for the Prevention and Treatment of Oral-related Complications Caused by Radiotherapy for Head and Neck Malignant Tumors

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06272617
Enrollment
138
Registered
2024-02-22
Start date
2023-07-25
Completion date
2025-07-24
Last updated
2024-02-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Malignant Tumor of Head and/or Neck, Radiotherapy; Complications

Brief summary

A study on the efficacy and safety of acupuncture for the prevention and treatment of oral-related complications caused by radiotherapy for head and neck malignant tumors

Detailed description

The goal of this clinical trial is to investigate the efficacy and safety of acupuncture for oral-related complications in patients with head and neck malignant tumors who receive radiotherapy. The main questions it aims to answer are: * the efficacy of acupuncture for the prevention and treatment of oral-related complications caused by radiotherapy for head and neck malignant tumors * the safety of acupuncture for the prevention and treatment of oral-related complications caused by radiotherapy for head and neck malignant tumors Participants will: * be treated with real acupuncture or sham acupuncture * be evaluated to learn the efficacy and safety of acupuncture for the prevention and treatment of oral-related complications caused by radiotherapy for head and neck malignant tumors Researchers will compare real acupuncture group with sham acupuncture group to see if acupuncture has good efficacy and safety of acupuncture for the prevention and treatment of oral-related complications caused by radiotherapy for head and neck malignant tumors.

Interventions

a type of acupuncture which is useful

DEVICEsham acupuncture

a type of acupuncture which is useless

Sponsors

West China Fourth Hospital, Sichuan University
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
West China Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients diagnosed with malignant tumors of the head and neck without metastasis * Age ≥18, ≤80 years old * ZPS score ≤2 * Receiving radiotherapy alone or concurrent radiotherapy with a radiation dose of \>50 Gy, including at least one parotid gland * Judged to be able to receive acupuncture treatment, with all needle positions identified as accessible * Signed informed consent form

Exclusion criteria

* History of dry mouth, Sjogren's syndrome, or other underlying systemic condition known to cause dry mouth * Suspected or confirmed physical closure of both salivary gland ducts * Have a phobia of needles or prohibit the use of acupuncture at any acupuncture points * Have a history of head and neck radiotherapy * Have contraindications to acupuncture, including but not limited to bleeding disorders, having skin infections, ulcers or frequent infections * Have taken any medications or herbs within the past 30 days that may affect salivary function, plan to or eventually take such substances during the study period * Poor oral hygiene or severe periodontitis * Poor compliance * Other patients who, in the opinion of the investigator, are not suitable for participation in this study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Xerostomia questionnaire scores1 week before radiotherapy;weekly during the treatment(every 5 radiotherapy sessions);1, 3, 6, 12 months after the end of treatmentPatients self-evaluated xerostomia according to Xerostomia questionnaire(score 0-100);Higher score indicates more severe symptoms

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Salivary flow rate1 week before radiotherapy;weekly during the treatment(every 5 radiotherapy sessions);1, 3, 6, 12 months after the end of treatmentResearchers-measured unstimulated and stimulated salivary flow rates;Lower value indicates more severe symptoms
Taste function assessed by electrogustometer test1 week before radiotherapy;weekly during the treatment(every 5 radiotherapy sessions);1, 3, 6, 12 months after the end of treatmentAssessed by electrogustometer test(score -6 to 34);Higher score indicates more severe symptoms
Taste function assessed by taste strips test1 week before radiotherapy;weekly during the treatment(every 5 radiotherapy sessions);1, 3, 6, 12 months after the end of treatmentAssessed by taste strips test(score 0-16);Lower score indicates more severe symptoms
Oral mucositis1 week before radiotherapy;twice a week during the treatment(usually every 3 radiotherapy sessions);1, 3, 6, 12 months after the end of treatmentOral mucositis is assessed by trained physicians according to World Health Organization (WHO) oral toxicity Scale(grade 1-5);Higher grade indicates more severe symptoms
Dysphagia1 week before radiotherapy;at the middle of treatment(3 weeks after the start of radiotherapy);at the end of treatment(the last radiation dose received, usually 6 or 6.5 weeks);1, 3, 6, 12 months after the end of treatmentDysphagia is assessed by M.D.Anderson Dysphagia Inventory(score 20-100);Lower score indicates more severe symptoms
Taste function assessed by patients1 week before radiotherapy;weekly during the treatment(every 5 radiotherapy sessions);1, 3, 6, 12 months after the end of treatmentAssessed by Patients self-evaluated dysgeusia(score 19-95);Higher score indicates more severe symptoms
Quality of Life assessed by QLQ-H&N351 week before radiotherapy;at the middle of treatment(3 weeks after the start of radiotherapy);at the end of treatment(the last radiation dose received, usually 6 or 6.5 weeks);1, 3, 6, 12 months after the end of treatmentQuality of Life is assessed by QLQ-H&N35(Head and neck cancer-related quality of life scale);transformed into 0-100 scales for different domains and symptoms;Higher scores represent worse quality of life
Adverse effectsup to 12 monthsAssessed by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) 5.0 version(grade 1-5);Higher grade indicates more severe symptoms
Changes of oral flora1 week before radiotherapy;at the middle of treatment(3 weeks after the start of radiotherapy);at the end of treatment(the last radiation dose received, usually 6 or 6.5 weeks);1, 3, 6, 12 months after the end of treatmentThe changes of oral flora in patients' salivary or oral swab measured by 16s rDNA technique
Tongue range of motion1 week before radiotherapy;weekly during the treatment(every 5 radiotherapy sessions);1, 3, 6, 12 months after the end of treatmentAssessed by Tongue Range of Motion Assessment Scale(score 0-100);Lower score indicates more severe symptoms
Neck Fibrosis1 week before radiotherapy;weekly during the treatment(every 5 radiotherapy sessions);1, 3, 6, 12 months after the end of treatmentAssessed by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) 5.0 version:Fibrosis skin(grade 1-5);Higher grade indicates more severe symptoms
Quality of Life assessed by EORTC QLQ-C301 week before radiotherapy;at the middle of treatment(3 weeks after the start of radiotherapy);at the end of treatment(the last radiation dose received, usually 6 or 6.5 weeks);1, 3, 6, 12 months after the end of treatmentQuality of Life is assessed by EORTC QLQ-C30(European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire);transformed into 0-100 scales for different domains and symptoms;Higher domain scores represent better quality of life, while higher symptom scores represent worse quality of life

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactXingchen Peng
pxx2014@scu.edu.cn+8618980606753

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026