Skip to content

Implementing PROMs and PREMs in Routine Clinical Care: Assessment of Requirements and Impact

Implementing PROMs and PREMs in Routine Clinical Care: Assessment of Requirements and Impact.

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06272552
Acronym
PROMs & PREMs
Enrollment
1440
Registered
2024-02-22
Start date
2023-10-25
Completion date
2027-10-31
Last updated
2024-02-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Impact Evaluation, Implementation Research, PREMs, PROMs

Keywords

PRMs Implementation, Implementation Research, Implementation evaluation, PROMs, PREMs, Impact evaluation, RCT, Health Services Research

Brief summary

There has been increasing interest in the use of patient-reported outcomes and experience measures (PROMs and PREMs) in clinical practice; yet few empirical studies have been conducted to evaluate the usefulness of such implementation. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of the implementation of PROMs and PREMs in routine clinical care for improving health outcomes and satisfaction with health management. Design: Randomized control trial. Setting: In and outpatient departments of a public hospital in Spain. Participants: 1,440 adult patients managed for breast cancer, prostate cancer, chronic kidney disease, or bariatric surgery. Intervention: Patients will monthly complete, through an App from their smartphones, PROMs and PREMs (arm A, n=480), or only PREMs (arm B, n=480). Responses to PROMs will be transformed into a graphic summary, accessible for physicians and patients at the follow-up visits of the project (9 and 18 months after recruitment). Main outcome measures: Comparison of change among arms on the assessment variables - such as health-related quality of life (EQ-5D-5L), satisfaction with care, or patient-professionals communication. These constructs will be measured at recruitment and at follow up visits for all patients, regardless of their arm allocation (arm C would only be administered these questionnaires, without intervention, n=480). Expected results: Incorporating PROMs and PREMs in routine clinical care may improve patients' and health professionals' experiences on health care, as well as improve patients' health.

Interventions

OTHERPROMs and PREMs

Participants are administered PROMs and PREMs at a given timeline adequate to each participant conditions for a duration of 2 years. The administration of PROMs is done by email using the REDCap platform. The research team and health care professionals have access to their patient's results to aid in the patients clinical care. Participants are administered a PREM once a year for two years. Only health care administrators, department heads and researchers will have access to the PREMs data, and this data will always be aggregated data to avoid identification of the patients. The administration of the PREM is done by email using the REDCap platform. At recruitment and once a year, participants answer an evaluation questionnaire to measure the impact of completing PROMs and PREMs. This questionnaire is completed during a clinic visit.

OTHERPREMs

Participants are administered a PREM once a year for two years. Only health care administrators, department heads and researchers will have access to the PREMs data, and this data will always be aggregated data to avoid identification of the patients. The administration of the PREM is done by email using the REDCap platform. At recruitment and once a year, participants answer an evaluation questionnaire to measure the impact of completing PROMs and PREMs. This questionnaire is completed during a clinic visit.

OTHERControl

At recruitment and once a year, participants answer an evaluation questionnaire to measure the impact of completing PROMs and PREMs. This questionnaire is completed during a clinic visit.

OTHERHealthcare professionals

Healthcare professionals participating in the study answer an evaluation questionnaire before the implementation starts at their service and two years later to measure their perceptions about the implementation.

Sponsors

Instituto de Salud Carlos III
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Parc de Salut Mar
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Being an active patient of the nephrology service, prostate cancer service, breast cancer service, or bariatric surgery service * In possession of an email account and having basic knowledge of how to manage emails * In possession of a smartphone, computer, or tablet with access to the Internet * Fluent and able to read in Spanish

Exclusion criteria

\- Under 18 years of age

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Evaluation quesionnaire (PRMIAT) of the implementation to be completed by all patients and healthcare professionalsAt recruitment and at 1 year intervalsThe PRMIAT measures the perceptions of the patients and healthcare professionals about the implementation of PROMs and PREMs in routine clinical care
Health-related quality of lifeAt recruitment and at 1 year intervalsMeasured with the EQ-5D-5L in all patients that participate.

Countries

Spain

Contacts

Primary ContactOlatz Garin, PhD
ogarin@researchmar.net+34 636210255

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026