The Comparison of Iodine in Saliva Between Gargle and Swab, The Retention of Iodine in Saliva Over the Time
Conditions
Brief summary
To compare the iodine remaining in saliva between gargle method and swab method
Detailed description
separate the participant in 2 groups group 1 use iodine gargle with gargle method, after 48 hours use iodine gargle with swab method group 2 use iodine gargle with swab method, after 48 hours use iodine gargle with gargle method The researcher will collect saliva before use iodine gargle and after use at time 0, 5, 10, 20, 30, 60, 120 minutes
Interventions
OTHERIodine gargle
Iodine gargle 0.2 %
Sponsors
Chulalongkorn University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)
Intervention model description
the participant will use iodine gargle in 2 method
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 30 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* Thai people * no underlying disease, no pregnant * at least 24 teeth * No use iodine gargle * No allergy to iodine and seafood * No orthodontic and prosthetic treatment * No ulcer and edentulous area * Saliva flow rate in male (0.57+-0.3 ml/minute), in woman (0.41+-0.27 ml/minute) * PI score lower than 0.6 (Green and vermillion index)
Exclusion criteria
* treatment orthodontic or prosthetic treatment currently * Allergy to iodine between reach * Can not participate
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| The rate of retention of iodine in saliva | 0, 5, 10, 20, 30, 60 and 120 minutes | The retention of iodine in saliva after get the gargle (show in percentage) |
| The comparison of the retention of iodine between gargle and swab | 0, 5, 10, 20, 30, 60 and 120 minutes | The comparison of rate of retention of iodine in saliva between gargle and swab (show in percentage) |
Countries
Thailand
Outcome results
None listed