Skip to content

Self-Compassion to Enhance the Well-Being of Caregivers of Children With Physical Disabilities

Developing and Piloting a Tailored Self-Compassion Program to Enhance the Well-Being of Informal Caregivers of Children With Physical Disabilities

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06271824
Enrollment
8
Registered
2024-02-22
Start date
2024-03-21
Completion date
2024-06-07
Last updated
2024-06-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anxiety, Caregiver Burden, Depressive Symptoms, Stress

Brief summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to test the feasibility, acceptability and preliminary social/emotional well-being outcomes of a tailored, online self-compassion-based resilience course for caregivers of children with physical disabilities. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. Is the online resilience course feasible and acceptable to caregivers of children with physical disabilities? 2. Is participation in the resilience course associated with improvements in caregiver stress, anxiety, depression, burden, caregiver uplifts, self-compassion, emotion regulation and/or resilience? Participants will complete a screening, a verbal consent process and an electronic pre-course survey. Then, they will participate in a 6-session weekly online course with other caregivers and led by a certified Mindful Self-Compassion instructor. The course has been created with feedback from caregivers and includes skills for recognizing and coping with difficult emotions while connecting with others who have similar caregiving experiences. After the course, participants will repeat the electronic survey and will provide feedback on the course during a live, online feedback session.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALSelf-Compassion Based Resilient Caregiving Course

The Resilience Habits for Caregivers Course is a live, online, weekly 6 session program lasting 1.5 hours per session. The structure contains didactics, group discussions, guided exercises, and practices facilitated by a certified self-compassion instructor. Topics covered include: (1) noticing and accepting emotions (including conflicting emotions); (2) cultivating curiosity and self-compassion; (3) relating skillfully to difficult thoughts; (4) savoring and gratitude practices.

Sponsors

University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Caregiver is at least 18 years old * Caregiver reads and speaks in English * Caregiver is a primary caregiver to a child aged 2-17 with a moderate to severe chronic physical disability (child requires assistance or adapted methods for mobility (e.g., walking, transfers) and at least 1 other functional area (e.g., toileting, feeding, communication))

Exclusion criteria

* Caregiver has no access to the internet/Zoom * Caregiver has been hospitalized in the last year for mental health treatment * Caregiver has a history of psychosis (e.g., schizophrenia) * Caregiver will miss 2 or more class sessions due to scheduling conflicts

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of participants who withdraw from courseAcross 6 weeks of interventionThe study records will indicate withdrawal status (Yes or No) for each enrolled participant who has attended at least 1 intervention session; Calculated by: number who withdraw/total number enrolled X 100
Percentage of participants who attend at least 4 of 6 intervention sessionsAcross 6 weeks of interventionThe study records will indicate weekly attendance at each session (Yes or No) for each enrolled participant who has attended at least 1 intervention session. Calculated by: number who attend at least 4 of 6 sessions/total number enrolled X 100
Percentage of participants who rate the course as acceptable or completely acceptable6 weeksThe Theoretical Framework of Acceptability includes 7-items regarding intervention acceptability on a scale of 1 to 5, scores range 7-35, higher numbers indicate greater acceptability. This general acceptability item will be used to assess overall acceptability of the course. Calculated by: number of participants who endorse acceptable or completely acceptable/total number of respondents X 100
Percentage of intervention topics coveredAcross 6 weeks of interventionA research assistant in attendance will use a fidelity checklist to assess if intended topics are covered each session (Yes/No). Calculated by number of topics covered/total number of topics intended to be covered X 100

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Change in Perceived Stress as Measured by the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10 item) at 6 weeksBaseline and 6 weeksThe PSS is a validated 10 item scale assessing the degree to which situations in one's life are perceived as stressful assessed over the last 7 days; scale ranges from 0=never to 4=very often; total scores range from 0 to 40 with higher scores indicating higher stress.
Mean Change in Resilience as measured by the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale-10 at 6 weeksBaseline and 6 weeksThe Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale is an 10-item measure of resilience and hardiness. Respondents rate items on a 5-point Likert scale, ranging from 0 (not true at all) to 4 (true nearly all the time). Each item has a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 4, total scores range from 0 to 40, and higher scores indicate higher resilience.
Mean Change in Anxiety as measured by the PROMIS-SF 7-item Anxiety Scale at 6 weeksBaseline and 6 weeksThe Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form v1. 0 - Anxiety 7a questionnaire includes 7 questions related to anxious mood in the past 7 days. Each question is rated on a five-point scale from 1=Never to 5=Always, with total scores ranging from 7-35 and higher scores indicating higher anxiety levels.
Mean Change in Depressive symptoms as measured by the PROMIS-SF 8-item Depression Scale at 6 weeksBaseline and 6 weeksThe Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form Depression scale measures depressive symptoms in the past 7 days. Each item on the measure is rated on a 5-point scale (1=never; 2=rarely; 3=sometimes; 4=often; and 5=always) with a range in score from 8 to 40 with higher scores indicating greater severity of depression.
Mean Change in Self-Compassion as measured by the Self-Compassion Scale-Short form (SCS-SF) at 6 weeksBaseline and 6 weeksThe SCS-SF is a 12 item scale that measures how often one is self-compassionate. Each item is rated on a 5-point scale from 1=almost never to 5=almost always with a range in score from 8 to 40 with higher scores indicating greater frequency of self-compassion.
Mean Change in Caregiver Burden as measured by the 12-item Zarit Caregiver Burden Scale (ZBI-12) at 6 weeksBaseline and 6 weeksThe ZBI-12 is a 12 item scale measuring caregiver burden. Each item is rated from 0 (never) to 4 (nearly always) with a range from 0 to 48 and higher scores indicating higher burden.
Mean Change in Caregiver Uplifts as measured by the Uplifts subscale of the Revised Burden Measure at 6 weeksBaseline and 6 weeksThe Uplifts subscale measures positive aspects of caregiving using 6 items answered in a 5-point response scale ranging from 1 (Not at all) to 5 (A great deal). Scores range from 6-30, with higher scores indicating higher degrees of positive experiences in caregiving.
Mean Change in Difficulties with Emotion Regulation as measured by the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation-Short Form ScaleBaseline and 6 weeksThe Difficulties in Emotion Regulation scale measures difficulties with regulation of emotions using 18-items representing 6 subscales (strategies, nonacceptance, impulse, goals, awareness and clarity) answered in a 5-point response scale ranging from 1 (Almost never) to 5 (almost always). Total scores range from 18- 90 with higher scores indicating higher levels of difficulty with emotion regulation.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026