Skip to content

Neuromuscular Training Program in Patients With Knee OA (Osteoarthritis)

Comparison of the Effectiveness of Neuromuscular Training Program and Conventional Physical Therapy Program in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06270329
Acronym
OA
Enrollment
70
Registered
2024-02-21
Start date
2022-01-15
Completion date
2023-06-15
Last updated
2024-02-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Knee Osteoarthritis

Keywords

Neuromuscular training, Knee osteoarthritis, Physical therapy

Brief summary

The aim of this study was to compare the effects of neuromuscular training program and conventional physical therapy program on pain, functional status, physical performance, balance, muscle strength and quality of life in patients with knee osteoarthritis (KOA).

Detailed description

The study was carried out in Afyonkarahisar Health Sciences University Health Application Research Center in individuals with 2nd or 3rd degree KOA according to Kellgren and Lawrence Classification. The study was planned as a randomized controlled clinical trial design. The study group were recruited to the neuromuscular training program and the control group were recruited to the conventional physical therapy program 5 days a week for 3 weeks. Individuals were evaluated at the baseline and after training programs. Demographic and clinical data were first recorded in the evaluation.

Interventions

Hotpack application TENS (transcutaneous electrical stimulation) Warm-up phase: bicycle ergometer (ten minutes) Exercise phase: core stabilization and postural control exercises postural orientation exercises lower extremity strengthening exercises functional exercises (balance and proprioception exercises using a balance board) Cool-down Phase

OTHERconventional physical therapy program

Hotpack application TENS (transcutaneous electrical stimulation) Conventional physical therapy exercises (straight leg raises, knee flexor and extensor strengthening, hip muscle strengthening)

Sponsors

Kutahya Health Sciences University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

randomized controlled clinical trial design

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Having grade 2 or 3 osteoarthritis according to the Kellgren and Lawrence Classification * Having pain score of 2 or above on VAS * Not having received physical therapy in the last 3 months * Not having received an intra-articular corticosteroid injection in the last 6 months * Not having used oral corticosteroids in the last month * Being between the ages of 40-80 * Body mass index being between 19-40 kg/cm2

Exclusion criteria

* Systemic arthritis * Hypertensive condition that prevents exercise * Pregnancy, cognitive impairment, parkinson-like neurological disorders * Having had a knee or hip joint replacement

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Visual Analog ScaleAt first and third weekPain evaluation. The participant is asked to give a score between 1 and 10 for her pain.
Western Ontario and McMasterUniversities Osteoarhritis IndexAt first and third weekFunctional status evaluation. The scale consists of 3 subheadings that evaluate pain, stiffness and physical function. High Western Ontario and McMasterUniversities Osteoarhritis Index score indicates increased pain and stiffness and deterioration in physical function.
Time on One Leg StandingAt first and third weekBalance evaluation. Participants were asked to stand on one leg with their eyes open for as long as possible, and the time was measured with a stopwatch and recorded in seconds.
Five Times Sit to Stand TestAt first and third weekPhysical performance evaluation. The time it takes for the patient to sit and stand up from a chair five times is recorded. As time decreases, it indicates better performance.
Manual Muscle TestAt first and third weekMuscle strength evaluation. A score between 0 and 5 is given depending on muscle strength.
Short FormAt first and third weekQuality of life evaluation. It consists of 8 subheadings: physical function, problems caused by physical problems, emotional well-being, problems caused by emotional problems, general health, social function, pain, energy/fatigue. High scores indicate good health, low scores indicate poor health.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026