Skip to content

CBCT vs OPT on the Oral Health Status at 12 Months of Patients Hospitalized for Infective Endocarditis.

3D Imaging (Cone Beam Computed Tomography) Versus Orthopantomogram on the Oral Health Status at 12 Months of Patients Hospitalized for Infective Endocarditis: a Multicenter Randomized Superiority Controlled Trial.

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06269679
Acronym
3D STARS
Enrollment
170
Registered
2024-02-21
Start date
2024-12-18
Completion date
2028-07-18
Last updated
2026-04-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Infective Endocarditis

Brief summary

1\. Infective Endocarditis (IE) is a rare and serious disease with high morbidity and mortality; 2. Streptoccoci of oral origin are the second more frequent microorganisms responsible for IE; 3. Oral Infectious Foci (OIF) are underdetected using the current recommended clinical examination/Orthopantomogram (OPT) approach; 4. Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) has a better sensitivity and sensibility to detect OIF than OPT; 5. To date, no study has been performed to assess the potential benefit of a clinical examination/CBCT approach on the oral health status in IE patients. Thus, conducting a randomized controlled trial is highly desirable to assess the potential impact of a clinical examination/CBCT approach on the oral health status of patients hospitalized for IE and potentially to reduce IE new episodes.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTCBCT

Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) has a better sensitivity and sensibility to detect OIF.

Sponsors

Nantes University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 100 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Patients hospitalized or recently hospitalized for definite IE according to the 2015 ESC classification, naive patients for dental examination and imaging, whatever the IE responsible microorganism; 2. Patients with a stable clinical state, meaning stabilized IE patients out of the critical phase, compatible with the performance of an OPT and a CBCT; 3. Patients whose life expectancy is expected to be longer than 6 months; 4. Patients who agree to visit the dental department of the hospital to carry out OIF eradication or at his/her personal dentist; 5. Patients over 18 years old; 6. Patients affiliated to a Social Security or a health insurance scheme; 7. Patients who have given informed consent to participate to the study.

Exclusion criteria

1. OPT or CBCT already performed before the inclusion of the patients in the study and available for the investigator during the patient's hospitalization. 2. Medical contraindications to perform OPT or CBCT imaging; 3. Absence of microbiologic identification of the IE responsible microorganism; 4. Pregnant or breastfeeding women; 5. Patients unable to give informed consent to participate to the study (under trusteeship, guardianship and legal protection).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Superiority of CBCTMonth 12Number of oral infectious foci detected using orthopantomogram versus Cone Beam Computer Tomography

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Diagnostic at inclusionDay 0Determine the diagnostic impact of clinical examination combined with CBCT at inclusion visit (Number of OIF detected at inclusion visit through clinical examination and CBCT versus clinical examination and OPT).
Incident symptomatic OIFMonth 12Monitor incident symptomatic OIF occuring during the study impacting the initial personalized OIF management (Number of incident symptomatic OIF detected during the study).
Incident asymptomatic OIFMonth 12Monitor incident asymptomatic OIF occuring during the study i.e. OIF absent at the initial examination but identified at the ultimate visit without symptomatic episode, in patients subjected to a clinical oral examination coupled with a CBCT (Number of incident asymptomatic OIF occuring during the study i.e. OIF absent at the initial examination but detected at the ultimate visit without symptomatic episode, in patients subjected to a clinical oral examination coupled with a CBCT).
Oral hygieneDay 0 and Month 12Evaluate the oral hygiene of the IE patients included in the study (Oral hygiene using the Oral Hygiene Index- Simplified score (OHI-S) at inclusion visit and at the end-of-study visit).
Follow-up habitsDay 0 and Month 12Evaluate the follow-up habits of the IE patients included in the study by number of dental visits per year at inclusion visit and at the end-of-study visit).
Oral health quality of lifeDay 0 and Month 12Assess the oral health quality of life of the IE patients included in this study (Oral health quality of life using by the short version of the self-administrated Oral Health impact profile-14 questionnaire (OHIP-14), at inclusion visit and at the end-of-study visit).
Premature end of studyMonth 12Analyse the patient's premature end of study (Causes of the patient's premature end of study: loss to follow-up, death, patient withdrawing consent).
Impact of dental OIFMonth 12Number of dental OIF detected at the end-of-study visit through clinical examination versus number of periodontal OIF detected at the inclusion visit through clinical examination.
Impact of periodontal OIFMonth 12Number of periodontal OIF detected at the end-of-study visit through clinical examination versus number of periodontal OIF detected at the inclusion visit through clinical examination.
Impact of mucosal OIFMonth 12Number of mucosal OIF detected at the end-of-study visit through clinical examination versus number of periodontal OIF detected at the inclusion visit through clinical examination.

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 7, 2026