Skip to content

Epithelium-on Cross-linking Versus Observation of Fellow Eyes of Patients With Unilateral Clinically Evident Keratoconus

Epithelium-on Accelerated Corneal Cross-linking Versus Observation of Fellow Eyes of Young Patients With Unilateral Clinically Evident Keratoconus

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06267495
Enrollment
40
Registered
2024-02-20
Start date
2017-01-01
Completion date
2024-01-31
Last updated
2024-02-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Keratoconus

Keywords

Keratoconus, Corneal cross-linking, Epithelium-on CXL

Brief summary

Keratoconus (KC) is a bilateral asymmetric progressive corneal degenerative disease. The management of young patients, diagnosed with clinically evident KC in one eye and with no clinical signs of KC in the other eye, represents a real challenge for many ophthalmologists. The aim of the current study is to investigate the effectiveness and safety of epithelium-on accelerated CXL to stabilize the eye with no clinical signs of KC, in young patients with unilateral clinically evident KC, compared with standard care and follow-up only.

Detailed description

Keratoconus (KC) is a bilateral asymmetric progressive corneal degenerative disease associated with corneal thinning and protrusion with resultant irregular astigmatism and visual loss. Although several studies showed that epithelium-off corneal cross-linking (epi-off CXL) is more effective in preventing KC progression compared with epithelium-on corneal cross-linking (epi-on CXL), the removal of corneal epithelium in epi-off CXL might be associated with a number of serious complications such as persistent epithelial defects and sight-threatening infectious keratitis. Additionally, recent systematic reviews and meta-analysis concluded that epi-on CXL is as effective as epi-off CXL in terms of visual and topographic stability of keratoconus, but has the advantage of being much safer avoiding the complications of epithelial removal. The management of the better eye, of young patients with unilateral clinically evident KC, is controversial. Some ophthalmologists prefer to cross-link the better eye, while others prefer to conservatively follow it up, in order to avoid complications of epithelial removal in epi-off CXL.

Interventions

PROCEDUREEpithelium-on corneal cross-linking (epi-on CXL)

In epithelium-on corneal cross-linking (epi-on CXL), the cornea is soaked with riboflavin for 10 minutes (Paracel® for 4 minutes and VibeX-xtra® for 6 minutes) . Thereafter, the cornea is subjected to ultraviolet A at a wavelength of 370 nm to give a total dose of 5.4 J/cm² through 10 milliwatt mW/cm² for 9 minutes.

Sponsors

Assiut University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
OTHER
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
12 Years to 30 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Patients aged 12 to 30 years presented with forme fruste (FFKC) or subclinical KC, based on the following criteria: 1. Normal slit lamp examination 2. Normal topography in FFKC and suspicious topography in subclinical KC with asymmetric bow-tie or inferior steeping (inferior-superior value less than 1.40 D in the anterior sagittal curvature map in pentacam) 3. Clinical and topographic features of KC in the other eye.

Exclusion criteria

1. Corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) worse than 0.1 logMAR 2. Corneal thickness at the thinnest location less than 400 μm 3. Severe ocular allergy (active catarrhal keratoconjunctivitis) 4. Other corneal or ocular diseases 5. Systemic diseases such as diabetes mellitus and autoimmune diseases

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Steep keratometry value24 monthsThe steep keratometry is measured using pentacam. A higher value means a worse outcome.
Maximum keratometry value24 monthsThe maximum keratometry is measured using pentacam. A higher value means a worse outcome.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Corrected distance visual acuity24 monthsCorrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) is measured with Snellen's acuity chart and converted to logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) notation. The higher the logMAR CDVA, the worse the outcome.

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026