Allergic Asthma, Allergic Rhinitis
Conditions
Brief summary
There is no clinical evidence that face masks are efficient in birch pollen-induced asthma. As the use of face masks has become widespread worldwide to limit the spread of SARS-CoV-2, this study aims to demonstrate the clinical efficacy of medical masks in patients allergic to birch in the same way that clinical trial with drugs.
Detailed description
All patients should have positive skin prick tests and specific IgE to birch at screening visit. 24 patients with asthma response during 1-hour baseline exposure to airborne Bet v 1 in ALYATEC environmental exposure chamber.will be randomized into 2 groups: with (n=12) and without (n=12) a KOLMI® surgical face mask (OP-Air), for a 6-hour exposure to birch allergen. Allergic symptoms will be observed during the 6-hour exposure and compared between the 2 different groups (with and without face mask) to evaluate the efficacy of the face mask.
Interventions
DEVICEKOLMI® surgical face mask (OP-Air)
12 subjects are exposed to birch pollen allergen in ALYATEC EEC while wearing a KOLMI® surgical face mask (OP-Air)
Sponsors
Medicom
Alyatec
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 55 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
Main Inclusion Criteria: * Subjects who signed the written informed consent, * Subjects covered by health social identification number, * Subjects able to understand and complete study-related procedures, * Subjects reported history of symptomatic birch pollen allergen-triggered asthma (GINA1) with associated allergic rhinitis, * Positive skin prick test (SPT) with cat hair extract with mean wheal diameter ≥ 5 mm compared to negative control (NaCl reaction \< 2 mm), * Positive sIgE tests for birch tree pollen and Bet v 1 (≥0.7 kUa/L), * Subjects with FEV1 ≥ 70% predicted at screening and before allergen exposure, * Subjects with at least one drop in FEV1 ≥20% during the 1-hour baseline exposure * ACT≥ 20, * Women of childbearing potential with a negative pregnancy test throughout the study period and a highly effective contraception: oral contraceptives, condom with spermicide, intrauterine device, bilateral tubal ligation, vasectomized partner. Main
Exclusion criteria
* Allergen immunotherapy to birch pollen allergen for more than 1 month in the 3 years prior to the screening visit, * Ongoing allergen immunotherapy to another allergen, * History of anaphylactic reactions to birch allergen exposure or birch allergen immunotherapy, * History of anaphylactic reactions to another allergen in the last 6 weeks before inclusion, * Nasal polyposis, deviation of nasal septum or diagnosis of uncontrolled non-allergic rhinitis, * Subjects allergic to indoor environmental allergens (molds, house dust mite allergens) with obvious exposure to these allergens causing allergic symptoms,
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Time to early asthma response (EAR) | 0 to 6 hours | The efficacy of face mask is evaluated by the time necessary to observe an EAR during birch pollen allergen exposure in EEC |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Frequency of EAR and late asthma response (LAR) | 0 to 6 hours (EAR) - 3 to 24 hours after exposure (LAR) | The efficacy of face mask is evaluaed by the frequency of EAR and LAR during and after birch pollen allergen exposure in EEC |
| Severity of EAR and LAR | 0 to 6 hours (EAR) - 3 to 24 hours after exposure (LAR) | The efficacy of face mask is evaluated by the maximum percentage of drop of FEV1during and after EEC exposure |
| Nasal Symptoms | 0 to 6 hours. (Total Nasal Symptoms Score from 0 to 12, 0 being the worse and 12 the better score) | The efficacy of face mask is evaluated with specific questionnaire (Total Nasal Symptoms Score - TNSS) |
Countries
France
Outcome results
None listed