Skip to content

Dietary Protein Restriction and Health

Dietary Protein, FGF21 and Glucose Homeostasis

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06267235
Acronym
LOWPRO
Enrollment
23
Registered
2024-02-20
Start date
2018-05-01
Completion date
2024-01-31
Last updated
2024-05-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diet, Healthy, Protein

Keywords

Protein-restriction, FGF21, Energy, Insulin action

Brief summary

The incidence of type 2 diabetes worldwide has increased significantly over the past decades, which is associated with changing dietary habits and physical inactivity. According to the diet, so far there has been a great focus on the quality of carbohydrates and fat in relation to metabolic health, while the importance of protein has been neglected. The Danes' average protein intake is 1.5 g/kg/day, which is at the high end of the recommendations (0.8-1.5 g/kg/day) from the Nordic Nutrition Recommendations (NNR 2023). Recent studies in rodents have shown that protein restriction has positive effects on health, including improved glucose and insulin homeostasis and reduced fat mass, while a high intake of protein has a negative effect on insulin sensitivity. Previously the investigators have shown, in healthy young men, that consuming a diet low in protein (0.9 g/kg/day), compared to the participants usual diet (1.5 g/kg/day), over 7 days, resulted in an increased insulin sensitivity as well as a marked increase in the plasma fibroblast growth factor 21 (FGF21) concentration. The increased insulin sensitivity is thought to be mediated by the increase in plasma FGF21 concentration. However, the effect is not yet fully understood. It is also not clear whether the increase in plasma FGF21 concentration, as well as the mentioned metabolic effects on insulin and glucose homeostasis, will take place if the participants are kept weight stable on a eucaloric diet.

Detailed description

A three-arm protocol was performed. In protocol 1, participants ingested either a low-protein (LP) meal or a higher protein (HP) meal in a randomized order, separated by 72 h, followed by a 5-week low-protein, high-carbohydrate (LPHC) diet. In protocol 2 and 3, participants ingested either a LPHC diet or a low-protein, high-fat (LPHF) diet for 5 weeks followed by a higher protein diet (HPD) for another 5 weeks. All diets were eucaloric. Resting metabolic rate (RMR) was measured pre, during and post the protein-restricted interventions. A hyperinsulimic-euglycemic clamp was performed post the protein-restricted interventions and post the HPD interventions. A basal subcutaneous abdominal fat biopsy was obtained post the protein-restricted interventions and post the HPD interventions. In a run-in period over 14 days, the participant records the daily number of steps and physical activity, in order to determine their habitual activity level. During this period, a 4-day dietary record is performed, where all ingested food was weighed and recorded. During the experimental period the participant followed the supplied diet. All food consumed during the interventions was handed out to the subject at the institute. All food was packaged and weighed to 1 gram of accuracy. During the dietary intervention, a weekly test in the morning was performed, where the resting metabolic rate was measured and blood samples taken from the arm vein. At week 0, 5 and week 10 body composition was measured by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry scanning (DXA), and the fat biopsy was obtained . At all tests participants arrived fasting at the institute at 8:00 a.m. in the morning. The participant arrived by car or public transport.

Interventions

OTHERDietary protein restriction

The consumption of different diets restricted in protein replaced by either carbohydrate or fat and an habitual diet.

Sponsors

University of Copenhagen
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Longitudinal study changing diet during the intervention 5 weeks restricted dietary protein + 5 weeks habitual dietary protein consumption

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
25 Years to 35 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* BMI≤25 * Maximal oxygen uptake ≤42-51 ml/kg/min) • non-smoking

Exclusion criteria

* The use of medicine

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Energy balancefrom week 0 to week 10.Energy balance was measured in an over-night fasted state via indirect calorimetry expressed in MJ/day prolonged eucaloric dietary protein restriction compared with a higher habitual protein intake
Insulin sensitivityMeasured at week 5 (low protein, high carbohydrate diet) and week 5 on habitual diet and at week 5 (low protein high fat diet) and week 5 on habitual dietInsulin sensitivity was measured by the hyperinsulinemic, euglycemic clamp procedure

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Adipose tissue proteomicsAfter 5 weeks low protein, high carbohydrate and 5 weeks low protein, high fat. On the tenth week on habitual dietMass spectroscopy
Plasma FGF21Every week from week 0 to week 10Measured by Elisa

Countries

Denmark

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026