Myopia
Conditions
Keywords
Myopia, Binocular visual function, Brain network, Neurovascular connectivity
Brief summary
This study intends to conduct a relatively comprehensive binocular visual function examination and follow-up on two groups of myopic subjects, one receiving autostereoscopic 3D vision training and the other receiving 2D vision training as a control. The aim is to explore the impact of autostereoscopic 3D vision training on the accommodation and convergence functions of myopes. Additionally, synchronized EEG-fNIRS signals will be collected to investigate whether changes in binocular visual function are accompanied by corresponding alterations in brain function.
Detailed description
The prevalence of myopia is increasing, posing a serious threat to our visual health. East Asia and Southeast Asia are high-prevalence areas for myopia, with over 80% of young people suffering from myopia. China has one of the highest rates of myopia globally. Preventing myopia occurrence and controlling its progression have become urgent public health issues. Accommodative function may play an important role in the development of myopia. Studies indicate that factors such as hyperopic defocus caused by accommodation lag, prolonged near-plane fixation, and decreased accommodative flexibility may be associated with the occurrence and development of myopia. Convergence function works synergistically with accommodative function, and its impact on myopia is gradually gaining attention. Scientific and effective training methods to improve both accommodation and convergence functions might help slow down the progression of myopia. Research by Huang et al. suggests that visual training based on autostereoscopic 3D display technology can improve accommodative lag and enhance accommodative flexibility. However, this study only explored the immediate effects of a single training session, and the long-term effects remain unknown. Furthermore, questions about how training induces changes in the convergence function, whether changes in accommodative function coincide with changes in the convergence function, etc., still need further investigation. Therefore, this study intends to conduct a relatively comprehensive binocular visual function examination and follow-up on two groups of myopic subjects, one receiving autostereoscopic 3D vision training and the other receiving 2D vision training as a control. The aim is to explore the impact of autostereoscopic 3D vision training on the accommodation and convergence functions of myopes. Additionally, synchronized EEG-fNIRS signals will be collected to investigate whether changes in binocular visual function are accompanied by corresponding alterations in brain function.
Interventions
The video, designed according to the principles of pencil pushups, features a dynamic standard E and is presented on an autostereoscopic 3D display equipment.
Sponsors
Study design
Masking description
By employing a single simulation technology for blinding, both the 2D group and the 3D group share identical training equipment and a consistent video background. The only distinction lies in the subtle variation in the configuration of training markers. It is difficult for participants to differentiate their respective groups.
Intervention model description
randomized controlled trial
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
1. Age 18 to 30 years 2. Refractive errors: spherical: -9.00 to -0.50 diopters (D), cylindrical: -2.50 to -0 D, and binocular difference within 2.0 D 3. Monocular best-corrected visual acuity ≥20/20 4. Normal stereoacuity 5. Participants capable of understanding the purpose of this study and providing informed consent 6. Participants capable of cooperating with relevant examinations.
Exclusion criteria
1. History of ophthalmic disease other than refractive error, such as strabismus, cataracts, glaucoma, retinal or optic nerve diseases 2. Use of any medications affecting accommodative function or wearing orthokeratology lenses in the past 1 month 3. History of ocular trauma or surgery 4. Suffering from systemic or mental illnesses.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Accommodative facility | 8 weeks after intervention | Accommodative facility was tested using a lens flipper (+2.00D/-2.00 D lens combination) at baseline and 1 day, 1 week, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 8 weeks after intervention. |
| Vergence facility | 8 weeks after intervention | Vergence facility was tested using a lens flipper (3△BI/12△BO lens combination) at baseline and 1 day, 1 week, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 8 weeks after intervention. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| negative and positive relative accommodation | 8 weeks after intervention | Negative and positive relative accommodation was measured by phoropter at baseline and 1 day, 1 week, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 8 weeks after intervention. |
| Near point of convergence | 8 weeks after intervention | Near point of convergence was measured using push-up method at baseline and 1 day, 1 week, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 8 weeks after intervention. |
| Negative and positive fusional vergence | 8 weeks after intervention | Negative and positive fusional vergence were measured by phoropter at baseline and 1 day, 1 week, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 8 weeks after intervention. |
| Electroencephalogram (EEG) node efficiency | 8 weeks after intervention | Electroencephalogram was performed to track the electrical activity of the brain in real time at baseline and 1 day, 1 week, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 8 weeks after intervention. Node efficiency was calculated. Node efficiency is a metric that characterizes the efficiency of a single node in connecting with all other parts of the network. It reflects the centrality and importance of a node within the network. |
| Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) | 8 weeks after intervention | Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) was conducted to capture spatial information on cerebral blood flow and oxygenation conditions at baseline, as well as 1 day, 1 week, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 8 weeks after the intervention. |
| Accommodation amplitude | 8 weeks after intervention | Accommodative amplitude was measured by push-up method at baseline and 1 day, 1 week, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 8 weeks after intervention. |
| Accommodative response | 8 weeks after intervention | Accommodative response was measured by the FCC method at baseline and 1 day, 1 week, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 8 weeks after intervention. |
Countries
China