Skip to content

Effects of Autostereoscopic 3D Visual Training on Binocular Vision Function of Myopes

Exploring the Effects of Autostereoscopic 3D Visual Training on Binocular Vision Function of Myopes Based on EEG and fNIRS

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06266910
Enrollment
80
Registered
2024-02-20
Start date
2024-02-15
Completion date
2024-10-10
Last updated
2024-02-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Myopia

Keywords

Myopia, Binocular visual function, Brain network, Neurovascular connectivity

Brief summary

This study intends to conduct a relatively comprehensive binocular visual function examination and follow-up on two groups of myopic subjects, one receiving autostereoscopic 3D vision training and the other receiving 2D vision training as a control. The aim is to explore the impact of autostereoscopic 3D vision training on the accommodation and convergence functions of myopes. Additionally, synchronized EEG-fNIRS signals will be collected to investigate whether changes in binocular visual function are accompanied by corresponding alterations in brain function.

Detailed description

The prevalence of myopia is increasing, posing a serious threat to our visual health. East Asia and Southeast Asia are high-prevalence areas for myopia, with over 80% of young people suffering from myopia. China has one of the highest rates of myopia globally. Preventing myopia occurrence and controlling its progression have become urgent public health issues. Accommodative function may play an important role in the development of myopia. Studies indicate that factors such as hyperopic defocus caused by accommodation lag, prolonged near-plane fixation, and decreased accommodative flexibility may be associated with the occurrence and development of myopia. Convergence function works synergistically with accommodative function, and its impact on myopia is gradually gaining attention. Scientific and effective training methods to improve both accommodation and convergence functions might help slow down the progression of myopia. Research by Huang et al. suggests that visual training based on autostereoscopic 3D display technology can improve accommodative lag and enhance accommodative flexibility. However, this study only explored the immediate effects of a single training session, and the long-term effects remain unknown. Furthermore, questions about how training induces changes in the convergence function, whether changes in accommodative function coincide with changes in the convergence function, etc., still need further investigation. Therefore, this study intends to conduct a relatively comprehensive binocular visual function examination and follow-up on two groups of myopic subjects, one receiving autostereoscopic 3D vision training and the other receiving 2D vision training as a control. The aim is to explore the impact of autostereoscopic 3D vision training on the accommodation and convergence functions of myopes. Additionally, synchronized EEG-fNIRS signals will be collected to investigate whether changes in binocular visual function are accompanied by corresponding alterations in brain function.

Interventions

OTHERVisual training video

The video, designed according to the principles of pencil pushups, features a dynamic standard E and is presented on an autostereoscopic 3D display equipment.

Sponsors

South China University of Technology
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

By employing a single simulation technology for blinding, both the 2D group and the 3D group share identical training equipment and a consistent video background. The only distinction lies in the subtle variation in the configuration of training markers. It is difficult for participants to differentiate their respective groups.

Intervention model description

randomized controlled trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 30 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Age 18 to 30 years 2. Refractive errors: spherical: -9.00 to -0.50 diopters (D), cylindrical: -2.50 to -0 D, and binocular difference within 2.0 D 3. Monocular best-corrected visual acuity ≥20/20 4. Normal stereoacuity 5. Participants capable of understanding the purpose of this study and providing informed consent 6. Participants capable of cooperating with relevant examinations.

Exclusion criteria

1. History of ophthalmic disease other than refractive error, such as strabismus, cataracts, glaucoma, retinal or optic nerve diseases 2. Use of any medications affecting accommodative function or wearing orthokeratology lenses in the past 1 month 3. History of ocular trauma or surgery 4. Suffering from systemic or mental illnesses.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Accommodative facility8 weeks after interventionAccommodative facility was tested using a lens flipper (+2.00D/-2.00 D lens combination) at baseline and 1 day, 1 week, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 8 weeks after intervention.
Vergence facility8 weeks after interventionVergence facility was tested using a lens flipper (3△BI/12△BO lens combination) at baseline and 1 day, 1 week, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 8 weeks after intervention.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
negative and positive relative accommodation8 weeks after interventionNegative and positive relative accommodation was measured by phoropter at baseline and 1 day, 1 week, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 8 weeks after intervention.
Near point of convergence8 weeks after interventionNear point of convergence was measured using push-up method at baseline and 1 day, 1 week, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 8 weeks after intervention.
Negative and positive fusional vergence8 weeks after interventionNegative and positive fusional vergence were measured by phoropter at baseline and 1 day, 1 week, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 8 weeks after intervention.
Electroencephalogram (EEG) node efficiency8 weeks after interventionElectroencephalogram was performed to track the electrical activity of the brain in real time at baseline and 1 day, 1 week, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 8 weeks after intervention. Node efficiency was calculated. Node efficiency is a metric that characterizes the efficiency of a single node in connecting with all other parts of the network. It reflects the centrality and importance of a node within the network.
Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS)8 weeks after interventionFunctional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) was conducted to capture spatial information on cerebral blood flow and oxygenation conditions at baseline, as well as 1 day, 1 week, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 8 weeks after the intervention.
Accommodation amplitude8 weeks after interventionAccommodative amplitude was measured by push-up method at baseline and 1 day, 1 week, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 8 weeks after intervention.
Accommodative response8 weeks after interventionAccommodative response was measured by the FCC method at baseline and 1 day, 1 week, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 8 weeks after intervention.

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactYehong Zhuo
zhuoyh@mail.sysu.edu.cn13352828998
Backup ContactHaishun Huang
huanghsh9@mail2.sysu.edu.cn13229518626

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026