Skip to content

Dismantling the U.S. Social Norm of the Kids' Food Archetype (REACH Project)

Dismantling the U.S. Social Norm of the Kids' Food Archetype That Includes Ultra-processed Foods Such as Chicken Nuggets and Fries in the Newark, NJ Community

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06266533
Enrollment
38
Registered
2024-02-20
Start date
2024-02-21
Completion date
2024-07-01
Last updated
2025-07-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Environmental Exposure, Food Selection

Brief summary

This project is the first stage of a health promotion campaign to shift social norms about marketing and feeding children ultra-processed foods. Embedded within a longitudinal ethnographic study using photo-elicitation techniques, mothers of preschool-age children will be randomly assigned to arts-based or traditional education about ultra-processed food.

Detailed description

1. At baseline, describe how mothers of preschool-age children characterize food for children in their home and local environment and describe their knowledge of ultra-processed food. 2. To test different ways of providing nutrition education for increasing knowledge about children's nutrition and ultra-processed foods. Hypothesis: Both groups will correctly identify more ultra-processed foods post-education. 3. To learn in depth from mothers of preschool children about their perceptions of the food environmental culture (markets, advertising, health messaging, community norms, cultural norms, social norms) in Newark, NJ, through a series of focus group discussions about the mothers' photographs of the local food environment pre and post project.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALConventional Ultra-processed Food Nutrition Education

The participants will receive a conventional nutrition education session with slides, flyers/handouts, and a lecture with discussion.

BEHAVIORALArts-based Ultra-processed Food Nutrition Education

The participants will receive an arts-based nutrition education session with video, animation, music, and discussion.

Sponsors

Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Participants will be randomly assigned to a conventional nutrition education or an arts-based education group.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* English-speaking * African American or Black or bi-racial or multi-racial African American and Black mothers * \>18 years * Female * Legal guardian of a preschool-age child (3-5 years) participating in the Leaguers, Inc. Head Start programming.

Exclusion criteria

* Spanish-speaking * Other racial and ethnic groups * Fathers

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Ultra-Processed Food Knowledge60 minutesParticipants will classify pictures of foods as ultra-processed or whole foods (adapted from Sarmiento-Santos, cited below) and as healthy or unhealthy. on a Pre and post-ultra-processed food knowledge questionnaire. Both sets of questions are yes or no categorical questions.
Environmental assessment of ultra-processed food6 monthsParticipant photographs of the local food environment. At two time points (pre and post educational intervention) participants will take photographs of the local food environment including grocery stores, restaurant menus, etc. The purpose of this is to learn from participants about how they perceive the local kids' food environment and if they observe differences after the intervention. Photo elicitation techniques will be used during a series of focus groups for participants to discuss the photographs they took. These data will be analyzed using a layered analysis of the photographs (appraisal, discussion with participant who took the photo, cross-photo comparison, and interpretation) pre and post educational intervention, and thematic analysis of the focus group transcripts.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026