Obstetrics, Ultrasonography
Conditions
Keywords
Quality
Brief summary
The goal of this observational study is to determine whether the subjective assessment of the quality of obstetrical ultrasonography pictures can be similar to that of an objective tool. The main question it aims to answer is: Is the subjective assessment of the quality of obstetrical ultrasonography pictures by a young practitioner and an experienced one can be similar to that of an objective tool, such as the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR)? The contrast-to-noise ratio is commonly used in radiology to evaluate image quality by assessing the ability to distinguish differences between two elements. The investigators selected a retrospective cohort of 198 patients, including three pictures per fetus screened between 18 and 18 weeks and 6 days. For each picture, the investigators assessed the quality of two different elements and the entire image, and then calculated the CNR using software. The investigators will compare the three assessment between them
Interventions
None listed
Sponsors
Poitiers University Hospital
Study design
Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Inclusion criteria
* Patient who underwent ultrasound between 18 weeks and 18 weeks + 6 days for prenatal diagnosis * Ultrasound performed by the same practitioner * Ultrasound performed on the same ultrasound machine Voluson E10, with the RM6C probe
Exclusion criteria
* Patient's refusal * Use of another ultrasound device other than the Voluson E10, and/or an ultrasound probe other than the RM6C * Intrauterine fetal deaths
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| The comparability between a subjective and objective assessment of the contrast to noise ratio of an obstetric ultrasound image | baseline | Both an experienced operator (a Ph.D. doctor) and a novice operator (a residency student) subjectively evaluated the contrast and noise of each region of interest previously chosen. Contrast was scored on a scale of 1 to 3, with 1 indicating low contrast, 2 for medium, and 3 for high contrast. Noise was scored on the same scale, with 1 corresponding to low noise, 2 for medium, and 3 for high noise. The subjective contrast to noise ratio (CNR) was determined by the ratio between these two scores. To assess the objective CNR, computer-assisted image analysis was performed using MATLAB software. |
Countries
France
Outcome results
None listed