Skip to content

Brain STimulation for Arm Recovery After Stroke 2

Brain STimulation for Arm Recovery After Stroke 2

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06265766
Acronym
B-STARS2
Enrollment
454
Registered
2024-02-20
Start date
2024-12-09
Completion date
2029-12-31
Last updated
2025-08-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Stroke

Keywords

Stroke, Transcranial magnetic stimulation, Continuous theta burst stimulation, Upper limb recovery, TMS, cTBS

Brief summary

Rationale: Every year, about 40,000 people in the Netherlands have a stroke. After the initial admission to the hospital, about 15% of stroke survivors is admitted to a rehabilitation center because of remaining disabilities. Three out of four of these patients have upper limb dysfunction, hampering activities of daily living. Upper limb function plays a critical role in the performance of most daily life activities. In our phase II trial B-STARS, continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) treatment led to an absolute additional recovery of upper limb function of 17%, as measured with the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) score three months after stroke. This improvement exceeds the minimal clinically important difference of 10%. cTBS treatment also resulted in a significant improvement in measures of activities and participation (of similar magnitude) and a reduction in the mean length of stay at the rehabilitation center by 18 days. Objective: To assess the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of cTBS treatment in promoting upper limb recovery after stroke in patients admitted to a rehabilitation center. Study design: A phase III, multi-center, double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled, clinical trial. Study population: 454 patients aged 18 years or older with a first-ever ischemic stroke or intracerebral hemorrhage and a unilateral arm paresis, defined by a Motricity Index between 9 and 99, in whom cTBS treatment can be started within 3 weeks after stroke onset. Intervention: 10 daily sessions of cTBS delivered over the contralesional primary motor cortex during a period of 2 weeks, delivered immediately before regular care physical therapy of the affected upper limb. Main study parameters/endpoints: The primary endpoint will be the score on the upper extremity section of the Fugl-Meyer assessment (FM-UE) at 90 days after stroke. Secondary endpoints will include the score on the FM-UE at one year and the scores on the Action Research Arm Test, Nine Hole Peg Test, Stroke Impact Scale, EuroQol 5 Dimensions and modified Rankin Scale at 90 days and one year after stroke

Interventions

10 sessions of active cTBS delivered to the contralesional primary motor cortex, started within 3 weeks after stroke.

DEVICESham cTBS

10 sessions of sham cTBS delivered to the contralesional primary motor cortex, started within 3 weeks after stroke.

Sponsors

Jord Vink
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Sham cTBS treatment is delivered with a sham TMS-coil.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age, 18 years or older * First-ever unilateral ischemic stroke or intracerebral hemorrhage in a cerebral hemisphere or the brainstem; * Unilateral upper limb paresis with a motricity index between 9 and 99; * Possibility to start cTBS treatment within 21 days after stroke onset; * Signed informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

* Upper limb paresis prior to stroke onset; * Absolute contra-indication to TMS * Magnetic sensitive objects implanted in the head or neck area (e.g. cochlear implants, implanted neurostimulator, pacemaker or defibrillator, metal splinters, metal fragments or metal clips); * History of epilepsy; * Other contra-indications that may potentially be harmful as determined by the treating rehabilitation physician; * Severe impairments that can impede study participation as determined by the treating rehabilitation physician (i.e. extreme fatigue, severe communication deficits); * Life expectancy shorter than one year.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Upper extremity section of the Fugl-Meyer Assessmentat 90 days post-strokeThe score ranges from 0 to 66 points with a higher score indicating better outcome

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Action Research Arm Testat 90 days and 12 months post-strokeThe score ranges from 0 to 57 points with a higher score indicating better outcome
modified Rankin Scaleat 90 days and 12 months post-strokeThe score ranges from 0 to 6 points with a lower score indicating better outcome
Hand section of Stroke Impact Scaleat 90 days and 12 months post-strokeThe score ranges from 0 to 25 points with a higher score indicating better outcome
Participation section of Stroke Impact Scaleat 90 days and 12 months post-strokeThe score ranges from 0 to 40 points with a higher score indicating better outcome
Upper extremity section of the Fugl-Meyer Assessmentat 12 months post-strokeThe score ranges from 0 to 66 points with a higher score indicating better outcome
Nine Hole Peg Testat 90 days and 12 months post-strokeThe outcome ranges from 0 to 50 seconds with a shorter outcome indicating better outcome
Ipsilesional corticospinal excitabilitywithin 12 hours after the 10th cTBS sessionIpsilesional corticospinal excitability is defined as the resting motor threshold of the ipsilesional hemisphere as determined with single pulse TMS. The outcome ranges from 0 to 100% of the machine output
iMTA medical consumption questionnaireat 6 and 12 months post-strokeThis questionnaire aims to identify costs associated with medical consumption
iMTA productivity cost questionnaireAt 6 and 12 months post-strokeThis questionnaire aims to identify costs associated with productivity loss of paid work.
EuroQol-5Dat 90 days and 12 months post-strokeThe score ranges from 0 to 5 points per item with a higher score indicating better outcome

Countries

Netherlands

Contacts

Primary ContactJord Vink, PhD
j.j.vink-5@umcutrecht.nl+31634959811

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026