Skip to content

Cryoablation Combined With Cardonilizumab and Bevacizumab in Hepatocellular Carcinoma With Pulmonary Metastases

Cryoablation Combined With Cardonilizumab and Bevacizumab in Hepatocellular Carcinoma With Pulmonary Metastases: A Single-center, Prospective, Randomized Controlled Phase II Study

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06265350
Enrollment
80
Registered
2024-02-20
Start date
2024-02-02
Completion date
2027-01-30
Last updated
2024-02-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bevacizumab, Cadonilimab, Cryoablation, Hepatocellular Carcinoma, Liver Cancer Stage IV, Pulmonary Metastases

Brief summary

This study intends to evaluate the efficacy and safety of cryoablation combined with Cardonilizumab and Bevacizumab in hepatocellular carcinoma with pulmonary metastases.

Detailed description

For advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the lung is the most common metastatic organ, accounting for 30-50% of extrahepatic diseases. The standard therapy for advanced HCC with lung metastases according to the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) criteria is system therapy. However, studies have proven that palliative ablation could improve the tumor controlling effect and the outcomes. Cryoablation is a treatment method that involves freezing tumors at extremely low temperatures to destroy and eliminate them. This therapeutic approach can result in the death of tumor cells through necrosis and also stimulate immune targeting of tumor cells. These immune responses occur as a result of tumor cell death caused by the ablation procedure. In comparison to conventional cancer therapies, cryoablation has minimal adverse reactions and has the potential to promote a more extensive and effective release of self-generated antigens into the bloodstream. Targeting vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) could reduce VEGF-mediated immunosuppression within the tumor. The IMbrave150 study of atezolizumab and bevacizumab versus sorafenib demonstrated response rates of 29.8% vs 12%, respectively, and median overall survival of 19.8 months in the combination arm versus 13.4 months in the sorafenib (P \<0.001). Bevacizumab could enhance anti-PD-1 and anti-programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) efficacy by reversing VEGF-mediated immunosuppression and promoting T-cell infiltration in tumors (2). Cadonilimab is a first-in-class bispecific, humanized IgG1 antibody targeting PD-1 and CTLA-4, which has the potential to boost immune surveillance in tumors. Preclinical studies have shown that its tetravalent design enhances its high binding activity in the tumor microenvironment. With no Fc binding, Cadonilimab could eliminate a series of functions mediated by the Fc receptor, which contribute to a poor safety profile in clinical settings.

Interventions

DRUGCadonilimab

Cadonilimab, 375mg,Q3W, IV

DRUGBevacizumab

Bevacizumab, 7.5mg/kg,Q3W, IV

PROCEDURECryoablation

Patients accepted Cryoablation of pulmanary metastases

Sponsors

Sun Yat-sen University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. primary or recurrent HCC; 2. synchronous metastases (within one month after diagnosing of HCC) or asynchronous metastases (more than one month after diagnosis of HCC); 3. pulmonary-only metastases \>5 and ≤10; 4. metastases diameter ≤ 5 cm; 5. intrahepatic tumors ≤5, and tumor burden ≤1/2 liver volume; 6. PVTT type Vp≤3; 7. patients underwent first-line system therapy failure, the first-line system included tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), such as Sorafenib or Lenvatinib, with or without PD-1 or PDL1 inhibitor; 8. the intrahepatic tumors were effectively controlled and pulmonary metastases were no progression, and the controlled intrahepatic tumors were defined as partial or stable response according to modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST); 9. locoregional therapy (including TACE or HAIC) were also included; 10. Child-Pugh class A or B; 11. PS 0 or 1; 12. no history of other malignancies.

Exclusion criteria

1. under 18 years or over 75 years; 2. metastases \>10 3. non-lung metastases; 4. incomplete clinical data; 5. metastases diameter \> 5 cm; 6. intrahepatic tumors \> 5, and tumor burden \> 1/2 liver volume; 7. PVTT type Vp 4; 8. lost to follow-up within 3 months.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Objective response rate (ORR)6 monthsORR, as determined based on tumor response according to RECIST 1.1, is defined as partial response and complete response.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Progression free survival (PFS)6 monthsPFS is defined as the time from the date of inclusion to the date of the first objectively documented tumor progression or death due to any cause.
Overall survival (OS)12 monthsOS is the length of time from the date of inclusion until death from any cause.

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactQunfang Zhou, MD
zhouqun988509@163.com86 19868000115

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026