Skip to content

NODE (groiN ultrasOunD cancEr)

Randomised Feasibility Study of Groin Ultrasound Surveillance to De-Escalate Surgical Intervention in Women With Vulvar Cancer

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06264167
Acronym
NODE
Enrollment
30
Registered
2024-02-16
Start date
2024-07-01
Completion date
2027-12-31
Last updated
2026-02-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Groin Node, Lymph Node Metastasis, Ultrasound Therapy; Complications, Vulvar Cancer Stage Ib, Vulvar Cancer Stage II

Keywords

Vulvar Cancer, Ultrasound Therapy

Brief summary

This study is an open label, prospective, experimental, randomised clinical trial. The primary aim of this study is to determine whether it is feasible to randomise vulvar cancer patients into one of two treatment arms:1) surgical groin node dissection (as delivered though either a sentinel node biopsy or inguinofemoral lymph node dissection (IFL), or 2) serial high-resolution bilateral groin ultrasound surveillance and clinical examination every 2 months for 12 months.

Detailed description

Treatment of vulvar cancer causes significant morbidity. Despite being a rare cancer, at least 2500 survivors of vulvar cancer live in Australia. Most survivors live with the detrimental, life-long impacts resulting from their cancer treatment because there are currently no alternatives to mitigate these impacts. The personal and societal burden this entails is significant. To control such cancer-associated burden is a national priority. Clinical palpation of the groin region and computed tomography (CT) scans do not reliably detect groin node involvement. Hence, current clinical guidelines recommend all women diagnosed at apparent Stage I or II have a surgical groin LND. This can be performed as a full IFL (full LND) to remove all groin nodes, or as a SNB to remove selected (one or two) nodes. SNB is less invasive, however, is appropriate only for vulvar cancers \<4cm in diameter and unifocal tumours (\ 50% of all Stage I and II vulvar cancers). SNB is also associated with a false negative rate (10%) that increases the risk of undetected nodes. In 25% of cases (\ 80 Australian women per year), groin LND will reveal positive nodes (i.e., metastases), which triggers a referral for radiation treatment. If positive groin nodes are missed, and over time become enlarged, clinically palpable and attached to the overlying skin, \>90% of women will die within 12 months, despite subsequent treatment. Conversely, if groin node involvement is detected early (e.g., by ultrasound) while still small, survival outcomes are excellent. Ultrasound technology is potentially as accurate as LND due to recent advances in resolution and technologies such as 2D/3D volumetric assessments and tissue flow. Furthermore, ultrasound is superior to medical resonance imaging (MRI), and to standard CT and positron emission tomography (PET) scans in capturing groin node involvement because it has a higher resolution, avoids harmful radiation and the technology is readily accessible outside of high-volume metropolitan areas. The investigators propose to reduce surgical morbidity by replacing upfront groin LND for vulvar cancer patients with serial high-resolution ultrasound to detect groin metastases. Groin LND will only be necessary for the few women with ultrasound-detected metastases when they are still small. This feasibility study (NODE - groiN ultrasOunD cancer) will determine the value of randomized serial groin ultrasound examinations in stage I and II vulvar cancer patients and whether it is feasible and safe for the investigators to de-escalate the extent of vulvar cancer surgery, aiming to achieve improved outcomes for affected patients. Australian women with this rare cancer bear an unacceptably high (and potentially avoidable) treatment-related burden. This feasibility study is the first step to address this problem in a novel yet pragmatic way. The overall outcome of NODE is a novel, less invasive alternative to vulvar cancer LND associated with significantly less morbidity, without compromising survival.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTHigh-resolution bilateral groin ultrasound surveillance

Participants in the Interventional Treatment (serial ultrasounds) group will undergo surgical excision of the primary tumor, either via radical wide local excision or radical vulvectomy. Post-vulvar surgery, follow-up appointments occur bi-monthly for 12 months, involving a clinical examination and groin ultrasound. Senior imaging specialists review bilateral ultrasound scans for positive lymph nodes or suspicious findings, promptly sending reports to the primary care physician and trial manager if detected within 3 business days. Subsequently, participants consult their primary care physician for options. Depending on clinical judgment, they may be referred for LND or continue with bi-monthly ultrasounds based on preference and clinician guidance.

Sponsors

Queensland Centre for Gynaecological Cancer
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV
Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
St Andrew's War Memorial Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Buderim Private Hospital
CollaboratorUNKNOWN

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Feasibility trial, open label, three-group, randomised clinical trial 30 eligible females aged 18 or older with clinically stage 1b or 2 vulvar cancer will receive a bilateral groin node ultrasound up to 30 days prior to planned surgery: Participants with normal/negative baseline groin ultrasounds will be randomly assigned to two groups (2:1 randomisation): one group undergoing radical procedures (groin lymph nodes are not removed) with bilateral groin ultrasound surveillance in conjunction with clinical examinations every 2 months, and the other group undergoing upfront full groin LND or sentinel node biopsy (SNB) based on clinician choice (according to local clinical practice management guidelines). Participants with suspicious/indeterminate baseline groin ultrasound (third group) will receive an upfront full groin LND or SNB, consistent with the current standard treatment, according to local clinical practice management guidelines.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Women, over 18 years, with histologically confirmed SCC or adenocarcinoma of the vulva * Clinically stage I or II on medical imaging (CT scan of pelvis, abdomen, and chest), without evidence of regional or distant metastatic disease * Participant must be suitable to undergo IFL/SNB according to local clinical practice management guidelines * Signed written informed consent * Negative serum pregnancy test ≤ 30 days of surgery in pre-menopausal women and women \< 2 years after the onset of menopause * Patient lives within 40 km of a medical diagnostic imaging centre (site investigator approval required for special circumstances)

Exclusion criteria

* Women with non-invasive vulvar conditions (e.g. non-invasive non-mammary Paget's disease) * Clinical or medical imaging evidence of regional and/or distant metastatic disease * Serious concomitant systemic disorders incompatible with the study (at the discretion of the investigator) * Other prior malignancies \<5 years before inclusion, except for successfully treated keratinocyte skin cancers, or ductal carcinoma in situ * Estimated life expectancy of ≤6 months

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Feasibility of randomisation: The percentage of patients willing to be randomised to either surgical groin node dissection or serial high-resolution bilateral groin ultrasound surveillance in conjunction with clinical examination every 2 months.12 monthsThe feasibility of randomisation into (1) LND (IFL vs SNB) or (2) high-resolution bilateral groin ultrasound surveillance every 2 months will be determined through a practical sample size of n=20. Feasibility is declared if 30% of eligible patients (n=6 or more) can be randomised.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Utility of tumour mutations to determine positive lymph node metastasis.Study duration up to 15 yearsTranslational research - Compare the molecular profile of tumour mutations between positive and negative lymph nodes.
Utility of circulating tumour DNA to determine positive lymph node metastasis.Study duration up to 15 yearsTranslational research - Compare the molecular profile of circulating tumour DNA between positive and negative lymph nodes.
Utility of plasma to determine positive lymph node metastasis.Study duration up to 15 yearsTranslational research - Compare the molecular profile of plasma between positive and negative lymph nodes.
Utility of serum to determine positive lymph node metastasis.Study duration up to 15 yearsTranslational research - Compare the molecular profile of serum between positive and negative lymph nodes.

Countries

Australia

Contacts

CONTACTSara Baniahmadi
s.baniahmadi@uq.edu.au07 3346 5073
CONTACTBrianna Armstrong
bri.armstrong@uq.edu.au07 3346 5063

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 21, 2026