Skip to content

TPAP for Comfort in OSA

The Effect on Subjective Comfort of a Device Providing Positive Airway Pressure (PAP) Drops During Inspiration (TPAP) Compared to Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) in Obstructive Sleep Apnea Patients

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06264128
Enrollment
150
Registered
2024-02-16
Start date
2024-03-08
Completion date
2024-05-25
Last updated
2024-12-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Keywords

CPAP, comfort

Brief summary

TheraPAP is a prototype device (with full documented electrical and isolation safety) being developed by SleepRes for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) that can deliver either standard CPAP at a set pressure or what is called TPAP . TPAP is a pressure control algorithm that lowers the pressure from the set pressure at the beginning of inspiration and does not return the pressure to the full set level until about halfway through expiration. The present study, TheraPAP Comfort, aims at assessing whether TPAP improves patient comfort vs. CPAP during supine wakefulness.

Detailed description

The TheraPAP Comfort Study is an in-office study to assess comfort of TPAP vs. CPAP in CPAP-naïve patients with OSA during supine wakefulness. Patients will be recruited after routine outpatient visits. They will be asked to breath normally for approximately 1 minute in supine wakefulness while being administered background CPAP (at 9 or 13 cmH2O) or TPAP at various pressure drops. TPAP drops will be administered in a paired comparison before or/and after each corresponding CPAP level, according to a randomized design. Eventually, 6 one-to-one comparisons (TPAP vs. corresponding background CPAP or TPAP vs. TPAP) will be made, 3 per each randomized order. As an example, CPAP 9 will be compared to TPAP 1/1 cmH2O drops; CPAP 9 will be compared to TPAP 2/2 cmH2O drops; and TPAP 1/1 cmH2O drops will be compared to TPAP 2/2 cmH2O drops in a random sequence.

Interventions

DEVICETPAP

TPAP is a form of CPAP therapy where the therapy pressure is reduced from the beginning of inhalation through mid or later exhalation. The CPAP therapy pressure is only present at the end of the expiratory phase.

DEVICECPAP

CPAP is a standard formal at home therapy for obstructive sleep apnea where a device attached via a facemask applies a constant pressure to a patient's lungs during sleep. It is the reference standard in this study.

Sponsors

SleepRes Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Masking description

There is no specific intent to mask although participants will be naive to CPAP-type therapy, but they will be able to feel the difference.

Intervention model description

All participants will undergo the same therapy combinations. CPAP (Continuous Positive Airway Pressure) and 2 level of TPAP (TheraPAP - novel CPAP approach pressure is reduced below therapy pressure from inspiration through mid exhalation specifically for comfort) will be assessed against each other in a round robin both backward and forward (6 total binary comparisons) for 2 levels of baseline pressure.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* 18 - 70 age range * AHI (apnea/hypopnea index) \> 10 on a previous HST (Home Sleep Test) * CPAP-naive participants * BMI (Body Mass Index) \>= 18 kg/m\^2

Exclusion criteria

1. Current clinically significant sleep disorder other than OSA (Obstructive Sleep Apnea) of a severity that would interfere with study participation or interpretability of data (including central sleep apnea, per central AHI \> 5 events/h). 2. Any chronic lung diseases. 3. Chronic oxygen therapy. 4. A serious illness or infection in the past 30 days as determined by investigator. 5. Patients with hypoglossal nerve stimulation implant. 6. Any non-previously mentioned vulnerable population. 7. Any condition that in the investigator's opinion would present an unreasonable risk to the participant, or which would interfere with their participation in the study or confound study interpretation.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
CPAP v TPAP Patient Preference at 9 cmH2O Baseline Pressure, TPAP Drop 2+2 cmH2OAll tests conducted in a 20 minute time frame on awake supine patients.Compare the comfort level of CPAP at 9 cmH2O against TPAP dropped by 2+2 cmH2O
CPAP v TPAP Patient Preference at 13 cmH2O Baseline Pressure, TPAP Drop 2+3 cmH2OAll tests conducted in a 20 minute time frame on awake supine patients.Compare the comfort level of CPAP at 13 cmH2O against TPAP dropped by 2+3 cmH2O

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
CPAP v TPAP Patient Preference at 9 cmH2O Baseline Pressure, TPAP Drop 1+2 cmH2OAll tests conducted in a 20 minute time frame on awake supine patients.
CPAP v TPAP Patient Preference at 9 cmH2O Baseline Pressure, TPAP Drop 1+1 cmH2OAll tests conducted in a 20 minute time frame on awake supine patients.
CPAP v TPAP Patient Preference at 13 cmH2O Baseline Pressure, TPAP Drop 2+2 cmH2OAll tests conducted in a 20 minute time frame on awake supine patients.
CPAP v TPAP Patient Preference at 13 cmH2O Baseline Pressure, TPAP Drop 1+2 cmH2OAll tests conducted in a 20 minute time frame on awake supine patients.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Overall Group
All participants in the study (who crossovered from one treatment arm to the other)
150
Total150

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicOverall Group
Age, Continuous43 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
17 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
7 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
123 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
85 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
65 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 1500 / 150
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 1500 / 150
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 1500 / 150

Outcome results

Primary

CPAP v TPAP Patient Preference at 13 cmH2O Baseline Pressure, TPAP Drop 2+3 cmH2O

Compare the comfort level of CPAP at 13 cmH2O against TPAP dropped by 2+3 cmH2O

Time frame: All tests conducted in a 20 minute time frame on awake supine patients.

Population: The outcome refers to % of participants who preferred TPAP over CPAP

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
CPAP vs. TPAP (Baseline Pressure: 9 cmH2O )CPAP v TPAP Patient Preference at 13 cmH2O Baseline Pressure, TPAP Drop 2+3 cmH2O84 percentage of total participants
Primary

CPAP v TPAP Patient Preference at 9 cmH2O Baseline Pressure, TPAP Drop 2+2 cmH2O

Compare the comfort level of CPAP at 9 cmH2O against TPAP dropped by 2+2 cmH2O

Time frame: All tests conducted in a 20 minute time frame on awake supine patients.

Population: The outcome refers to % of participants who preferred TPAP over CPAP

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
CPAP vs. TPAP (Baseline Pressure: 9 cmH2O )CPAP v TPAP Patient Preference at 9 cmH2O Baseline Pressure, TPAP Drop 2+2 cmH2O69.3 percentage of total participants
Secondary

CPAP v TPAP Patient Preference at 13 cmH2O Baseline Pressure, TPAP Drop 1+2 cmH2O

Time frame: All tests conducted in a 20 minute time frame on awake supine patients.

Population: The outcome data refers to participants (N=5) who preferred TPAP (with a 1+2 cmH2O drop) over CPAP at 13 cmH2O.Notably, this was a repeated test among participants who initially did not prefer TPAP in the comparison between CPAP at 13 cmH2O and TPAP with a 2+3 cmH2O or with at 2+2 cmH2O drop, independent of sequence. I.e., only 13 participants found CPAP more comfortable than TPAP at any drop, so testing continued with those individuals, of whom, eventually, 5 chose TPAP with 1+2 cmH2O drop

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
CPAP vs. TPAP (Baseline Pressure: 9 cmH2O )CPAP v TPAP Patient Preference at 13 cmH2O Baseline Pressure, TPAP Drop 1+2 cmH2O38.5 percentage of total participants
Secondary

CPAP v TPAP Patient Preference at 13 cmH2O Baseline Pressure, TPAP Drop 2+2 cmH2O

Time frame: All tests conducted in a 20 minute time frame on awake supine patients.

Population: The outcome data refers to participants (N=11) who preferred TPAP (with a 2+2 cmH2O drop) over CPAP at 13 cmH2O. Notably, this was a repeated test among participants who initially did not prefer TPAP in the comparison between CPAP at 13 cmH2O and TPAP with a 2+3 cmH2O, independent of sequence. I.e., only 24 participants found CPAP more comfortable than TPAP with 2+3 cmH2O drop, so testing continued with those individuals, of whom, eventually, 11 chose TPAP with 2+2 cmH2O drop.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
CPAP vs. TPAP (Baseline Pressure: 9 cmH2O )CPAP v TPAP Patient Preference at 13 cmH2O Baseline Pressure, TPAP Drop 2+2 cmH2O45.8 percentage of total participants
Secondary

CPAP v TPAP Patient Preference at 9 cmH2O Baseline Pressure, TPAP Drop 1+1 cmH2O

Time frame: All tests conducted in a 20 minute time frame on awake supine patients.

Population: The outcome data refers to participants (N=14) who preferred TPAP (with a 1+1 cmH2O drop) over CPAP at 9 cmH2O. Notably, this was a repeated test among participants who initially did not prefer TPAP in the comparison between CPAP at 9 cmH2O and TPAP with a 2+2 cmH2O or with at 1+2 cmH2O drop, independent of sequence. I.e., only 25 participants found CPAP more comfortable than TPAP at any drop, so testing continued with those individuals, of whom, eventually, 14 chose TPAP with 1+1 cmH2O drop.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
CPAP vs. TPAP (Baseline Pressure: 9 cmH2O )CPAP v TPAP Patient Preference at 9 cmH2O Baseline Pressure, TPAP Drop 1+1 cmH2O56 percentage of total participants
Secondary

CPAP v TPAP Patient Preference at 9 cmH2O Baseline Pressure, TPAP Drop 1+2 cmH2O

Time frame: All tests conducted in a 20 minute time frame on awake supine patients.

Population: The outcome data refers to participants (N=21) who preferred TPAP (with a 1+2 cmH2O drop) over CPAP at 9 cmH2O. Notably, this was a repeated test among participants who initially did not prefer TPAP in the comparison between CPAP at 9 cmH2O and TPAP with a 2+2 cmH2O, independent of sequence. I.e., 46 participants found CPAP more comfortable than TPAP with 2+2 cmH2O drop, so testing continued with those individuals, of whom, eventually, 21 chose TPAP with 1+2 cmH2O drop.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
CPAP vs. TPAP (Baseline Pressure: 9 cmH2O )CPAP v TPAP Patient Preference at 9 cmH2O Baseline Pressure, TPAP Drop 1+2 cmH2O45.6 percentage of total participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026