Volumetric Changes in Large Cystic Lesions Using Active Decompression and Distraction Sugosteogenesis vs Passive Decompression

In Patients With Large Cystic Lesion Does Volume Reduction Occurs Faster by Using Active Decompression and Distraction Sugosteogenesis Than Using Passive Decompression

Status

Not yet recruiting

Phases

Study type

Interventional

Source

ClinicalTrials.gov

Registry ID

NCT06262802

Enrollment

Registered

2024-02-16

Start date

2024-03-01

Completion date

2025-03-01

Last updated

2024-02-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Odontogenic Cysts

Brief summary

Null hypothesis active decompression and distraction sugosteogenesis is not faster than passive decompression in volume reduction of large cystic lesions

Interventions

DEVICEActive decompression

Intracystic active negative pressure

Study design

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Intervention model

PARALLEL

Primary purpose

DEVICE_FEASIBILITY

Masking

SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

ALL

Age

12 Years to 80 Years

Healthy volunteers

Inclusion criteria

* any patient with large cystic lesion

Exclusion criteria

* any patient can't follow home instructions

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame	Description
Volume change	2weeks/one and 6 months	Percentage of volume changes over time

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026