Skip to content

Evaluation of Using Self-adhering Flowable Resin Composite in Repairing Old Defective Resin Composite Restorations Over 18 Months Follow up. (A Randomized Clinical Trial)

Evaluation of Using Self-adhering Flowable Resin Composite Versus Conventional Nano-filled Flowable Resin Composite in Repairing Old Defective Resin Composite Restorations Over 18 Months Follow up. (A Randomized Clinical Trial)

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06260644
Enrollment
34
Registered
2024-02-15
Start date
2024-02-01
Completion date
2025-10-31
Last updated
2024-02-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Occlusal Caries

Keywords

flowable resin composite

Brief summary

This research proposal is evaluating the clinical performance of using self-adhering flowable resin composite in repairing old occlusal defective resin composite versus conventional flowable resin composite restoration over 18 months.

Interventions

PROCEDUREVertiseTM flowable composite (Kerr,USA)

self adhesive flowable resin composite restoration.

Sponsors

Cairo University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

double ( participants, outcomes assessor) participants and both assessors will be blind to the type of material used

Intervention model description

parallel assignment

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 35 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients (18-35 y) * patients with defective resin composite class I restorations that need repair. * dental motivated patients who attends regularly. * Vital posterior teeth with repairable defective resin composite class I restorations. * Localized marginal defect or marginal staining FDI 3& 4. * Teeth with no or minimum mobility & healthy peridontium. * No history of any irreversible pulpal pain or necrosis in the teeth to be restored.

Exclusion criteria

* • Patients with defective restorations that dictate replacement * Uncooperative behavior limits the isolation techniques throughout the procedure. * Presence of parafunctional habits. * Patient with history of systemic medical disease, or any other serious relevant problem. * High caries risk patients. Periodontal disease that may affect the prognosis of the restoration or the tooth itself. * Fractured or visibly cracked teeth. * Symptoms of any pulp pathosis. * Defective resin composite restorations that dictate replacement.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Restoration clinical performance using FDI criteriaassessment will be done after the treatment then 6 months, 12 months and18 months.FDI criteria mechanical parameters

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026