Skip to content

Hip Activation vs. Hip Activation + Core Stabilization

Comparison of a Hip Activation Versus a Combined Hip Activation and Core Stabilization Program on Improving Lower Extremity Function: A Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06260306
Enrollment
34
Registered
2024-02-15
Start date
2024-01-24
Completion date
2024-04-12
Last updated
2024-04-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Lower Extremity Problem, Movement, Abnormal

Brief summary

The purpose of this investigation is to compare the effects of a combined hip activation and core stabilization training home exercise program (HEP) versus a hip activation training HEP alone on lower extremity (LE) frontal plane mechanics in healthy individuals. Specific Aim 1: To determine whether between- and/or within-group differences exist on the Forward Step-Down test (FSDT) when comparing a combined hip activation and core stabilization training HEP as compared to a hip activation training HEP. Specific Aim 2: To determine whether between- and/or within-group differences exist on the peak external knee abduction moment when comparing a combined hip activation and core stabilization training HEP to a hip activation training HEP. Specific Aim 3: To determine whether between- and/or within-group differences exist on gluteal and core muscle surface electromyography (sEMG) when comparing a combined hip activation and core stabilization training HEP to a hip activation training HEP. Specific Aim 4: To determine whether a dose-response relationship exists between HEP compliance and change on the FSDT, peak external knee abduction moment, and sEMG.

Interventions

OTHERHip activation home exercise program

The hip activation HEP group will receive a combination of hip musculature activation exercises used by previous researchers that show an increase in hip muscle recruitment. Each participant will perform their respective intervention program at home twice weekly for eight weeks.

OTHERHip activation plus core stabilization home exercise program

The hip activation plus core stabilization HEP group will receive the same hip exercises, plus core stabilization exercises used by previous researchers. Each participant will perform their respective intervention program at home twice weekly for eight weeks.

Sponsors

Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center Shreveport
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)

Masking description

The PI who will be performing the data analysis will be blinded to participants' random group allocation. The other investigators who will be collecting the outcome data will know the group allocation.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
22 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Participants will be current first- or second-year Doctor of Physical Therapy (DPT) students in the School of Allied Health Professions (SAHP) at Louisiana State University Health Shreveport over the age of 21.

Exclusion criteria

* Current pain or pathology in either LE which currently limits their ability to perform the FSDT or drop landing task, a history of low back pain in the last three months, known pregnancy, as pregnancy is a risk factor for diastasis rectus abdominis (DRA) which may be exacerbated by participation in the intervention and could be a confounding variable, and current participation in other clinical trials.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Forward Step Down Test (FSDT)Pre- and post-eight week interventionRating on the FSDT (0-6; 0-1 = good movement quality, 2-3 = moderate movement quality, 4 or more = poor movement quality).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean activation of GMax via sEMGPre- and post-eight week interventionMean activation (% MVIC) of GMax during performance of the FSDT
Peak activation of GMax via sEMGPre- and post-eight week interventionPeak activation (%MVIC) of GMax during performance of the FSDT
MVIC via sEMG of gluteus medius (GMed)Pre- and post-eight week interventionMVIC (microvolts) of GMed during performance of the FSDT
Mean activation of GMed via sEMGPre- and post-eight week interventionMean activation (% MVIC) of GMed during performance of the FSDT
Peak activation of GMed via sEMGPre- and post-eight week interventionPeak activation (% MVIC) of GMed during performance of the FSDT
Maximal volitional isometric contraction (MVIC) via sensory electromyography (sEMG) of gluteus maximus (GMax)Pre- and post-eight week interventionMVIC (microvolts) of GMax during performance of the FSDT
Mean activation of TA via sEMGPre- and post-eight week interventionMean activation (% MVIC) of TA during performance of the FSDT
Peak activation of TA via sEMGPre- and post-eight week interventionPeak activation (% MVIC) of TA during performance of FSDT
Peak external knee abduction moment during drop landing taskPre- and post-eight week interventionKinetic assessment of the peak external knee abduction moment (Nm/kg) during the drop landing task
Compliance with Home Exercise ProgramPost-eight week interventionSelf-reported completion of each HEP session will be recorded by the participant and then returned to the investigators post-completion
MVIC via of transversus abdominis (TA)Pre- and post-eight week interventionMVIC (microvolts) of TA during performance of the FSDT

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026