Skip to content

Effectiveness of Personalized Breathing Exercise Device in Patients With COPD

Investigation of the Effectiveness of Personalized Breathing Exercise Device in Patients With COPD

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06259188
Enrollment
34
Registered
2024-02-14
Start date
2024-04-10
Completion date
2025-05-29
Last updated
2024-10-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Expiratory Muscle Training, Inspiratory Muscle Training

Brief summary

The current Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Diseases (GOLD) guideline emphasizes that pulmonary rehabilitation should be recommended to all chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients from Stage II onwards. Respiratory muscle training applied to individuals with COPD is an important part of pulmonary rehabilitation due to its benefits such as improving pulmonary function and respiratory muscle strength, reducing the severity of dyspnea, and increasing exercise capacity and quality of life. Although there is sufficient evidence in the literature about the benefits of IMT in individuals with COPD. There is little evidence showing the effects of EMT. Studies show that isolated IMT and EMT are effective in increasing respiratory muscle strength, endurance and exercise capacity. Results from a limited number of studies show that combined training of IMT and EMT is superior compared to isolated IMT or isolated EMT in improving exercise capacity and dyspnea. Incentive spirometers, with their different mechanical properties, are low-cost respiratory exercise devices that are widely used in the early postoperative period, lung diseases, long-term bed rest and in situations where it is necessary to maintain or increase the ventilation ability of the lung, but they do not apply any resistance to the respiratory muscles. In the pulmonary rehabilitation guidelines published by the American Thoracic Society (ATS) and the European Respiratory Society (ERS), the necessity of using devices that apply resistance to the respiratory muscles to strengthen the respiratory muscles is underlined. The personalized respiratory exercise device will be a device that has the clinical features of an incentive spirometer and respiratory muscle training devices (inspiratory and expiratory) and can be personalized according to the desired purpose. With the same device, patients will be able to both improve lung ventilation, such as an incentive spirometer, and strengthen their respiratory muscles.

Interventions

In the both groups the initial pressure load will be set to the resistance level corresponding to the 40% of the MIP and MEP measurement. Participants will be asked to rest following 5 breathing cycles and repeat the training for 10 sets. In each set, there will be a one-minute rest break between repetitions. In breathing exercise device group participants will be able to practice both inspiratory and expiratory respiratory muscle training in a single breathing cycle. In IMT+EMT group, patients will be able to practice different to device. As the progression progresses, the perceived exertion level will be increased by 5-10% every week, to be in the range of 4-6 according to the Modified Borg scale.

DEVICEPersonalized Breathing Exercise Device

Personalized Breathing Exercise Device

Sponsors

Biruni University
CollaboratorOTHER
The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey
CollaboratorOTHER
Istanbul University
CollaboratorOTHER
Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosed with COPD by a pulmonologist according to GOLD 2022 diagnostic criteria (GOLD, 2022) and in classes B, C and D according to GOLD * Followed for at least 6 months * Clinically stable patients without exacerbations or infections

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with a history of spontaneous or trauma-related pneumothorax * Patients with middle ear-related pathologies (such as tympanic membrane rupture, otitis) * Orthopedic and neurological problems that may interfere with exercise training * Changes in medical treatment during the study * Patients with unstable concomitant cardiac disease * Patients who have been involved in another pulmonary rehabilitation program within the last 6 months * Insufficient cooperation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Maximal static inspiratory mouth pressure1 week-8 weekMeasurement will be made with a respiratory muscle strength measuring device. MIP: maximal inspiratory pressure
Maximal static expiratory mouth pressure1 week-8 weekMeasurement will be made with a respiratory muscle strength measuring device. MEP: maximal expiratory pressure

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Respiratory Functions FEV1/FVC1 week-8 weekPulmonary function test: FEV1/FVC%
Respiratory Functions PEF1 week-8 weekPulmonary function test: PEF L/S and %
Diffusion Capacity1 week-8 weekPulmonary function test: DLCO%
Respiratory Functions FEV11 week-8 weekPulmonary function test: FEV1 L and %
Activities of daily living1 week-8 weekLondon Chest Activities of Daily Living Scale (LCADL): Perceived dyspnea while performing activities of daily living is scored between 0-5. A high score indicates greater disability in performing ADLs. The minimum total score 0 and maximum total score is 75.
Activity Status1 week-8 weekDuke Activity Status Index: The Duke Activity Status Index (DASI) is a patient-reported estimate of functional capacity, maximal oxygen consumption (VO2 max) and maximum metabolic equivalent of tasks (METs). The DASI questionnaire produces a score between 0 and 58.2 points
Device ease of use8 week5-Likert Scale: Scoring will be determined as 1- very difficult to use and 5- very easy to use.
Exercise capacity1 week-8 weekSpiropalm six minute walk test
Respiratory Functions FVC1 week-8 weekPulmonary function test: FVC L and %

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Contacts

Primary ContactOzge Ertan
ozge.ertann@gmail.com+902124141500
Backup ContactBuket Akıncı

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026