Skip to content

Clinical Performance of Therapeutic Use of BTX for Bruxism

Clinical Performance of Therapeutic Use of Botulinum Toxin in the Treatment of Bruxism: A Retrospective Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06258070
Acronym
BTX
Enrollment
67
Registered
2024-02-14
Start date
2009-09-01
Completion date
2017-12-30
Last updated
2024-02-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bruxism, Myofascial Pain Syndrome, Myofascial Trigger Point Pain, Pain

Keywords

Botulinum toxin, treatment, bruxism, myofascial pain syndrome

Brief summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn about the performance of botulinum toxin (BTX) injections for bruxism. Participants were divided into two groups according to the duration of the symptoms. The main question is whether BTX should be reserved for long-standing bruxism where the conventional methods failed or indicated as a first-line treatment. The investigator also compared the required doses and the frequency of treatment sessions between these two groups for a complete recovery.

Detailed description

The effectiveness of botulinum toxin (BTX) in treating bruxism is recognized and well-established. This study aims to provide the most suitable condition for a better performance of BTX injections. This retrospective study of a single-arm trial was conducted using a medical database of 67 patients who suffered from bruxism between 2009 and 2015, and who had total recovery after injection sessions. Patients were divided into two groups based on the duration of their bruxism. The main outcomes measured were: pain relief, the total number of injection sessions until total recovery, doses of BTX used, and recovery duration between two consecutive sessions. The treatment was stopped when bruxism disappeared. The investigator carried out injections using Dysport (Ipsen Pharma, Germany). The toxin was reconstituted with 0.9% sodium chloride solution so that 0.1 ml corresponded to 25 U. The patient received the same doses in each session, delivered to trigger points (TrPs). 0.05 ml was injected into each TrP. The level of statistical significance was set at p \< 0,01. The Chi-square test and ANOVA table were used to compare differences according to injection sessions, doses of BTX, TrPs, and recovery duration between the two groups (with long-standing bruxism, and recent bruxism).

Interventions

OTHERAbobotulinumtoxin A injection for bruxism

Trigger points were detected with careful palpating of the masticatory muscles (masseter and temporalis muscles) of patients suffering from bruxism. Each trigger point received 0,05 lm ol reconstituted solution of Abobotulinumtoxin A. Dysport (Ipsen Pharma, Germany) was reconstituted with 0.9% sodium chloride solution so that 0.1 ml corresponded to 25 U.

Sponsors

Mohamed Tahar Maamouri University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

A retrospective cohort study of two samples of participants ( group with long-standing for more than one year, group with recent symptoms for less than one year), with a single-arm trial (all the participants had the same treatment).

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
37 Years to 61 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients who self-reported having awake bruxism and recovered completely following BTX injections during the period ranging between 2009 and 2015. It includes patients who had previously occlusal splints and who should stop their use once the BTX injections were started.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients suffering from temporomandibular disorders or having a contraindication to BTX injection.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Correlation between doses of BTX and TrPs16 to 55 monthsThe required doses of BTX were compared according to the number of trigger points found in both groups

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Comparison of the rate of injection sessions16 to 55 monthsThe number of session of BTX injection for complete recovery was studied for both groups.
Correlation of the long standing symptoms and the time to recurrence16 to 55 monthsThe time to recurrence was compared between individuals of both groups.

Countries

Tunisia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026