Skip to content

Evaluation of Horizontal Bone Gain in the Lower Posterior Partially Edentulous Patient Comparing the Stabilization of Membranes With and Without Tacs

Radiographic And Clinical Evaluation of Horizontal Bone Gain in the Lower Posterior Partially Edentulous Patients Comparing the Stabilization of The Resorbable Collagen Membrane With and Without Tacs

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06257225
Enrollment
22
Registered
2024-02-13
Start date
2024-02-15
Completion date
2024-06-30
Last updated
2024-02-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Guided Bone Regeneration

Keywords

GBR, Tacs

Brief summary

To address the gap of knowledge in comparing between the bone augmentation outcomes with or without tacks for membrane stabilization

Interventions

PROCEDUREGuided Bone regeneration

After local anesthesia, a crestal incision will be performed followed by full-thickness mucoperiosteal flap elevation Flap advancement will be attained through periosteal scoring of the buccal; The resorbable collagen membrane (Bio Gide, Geistlich AG) will be trimmed to the defect size. Xenograft (Bio-Oss) together with scrapped autogenous bone will be mixed and placed at the surgical site. The membrane will positioned over the graft and tucked into the lingual flap. Patient allocation concealment will be broken and the patients will be randomly assigned into two groups Patients receiving horizontal bone augmentation with resorbable collagen membrane stabilized with no tacks. The first layer will be closed with horizontal mattress sutures placed 4 mm from the incision line, and single interrupted sutures are used to close the edges of the flap. Vertical incisions are closed using single interrupted sutures and mattress suture should remain in place for at least 2 to 3 weeks

Sponsors

Misr International University
CollaboratorOTHER
Cairo University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with at least 1 missing tooth in the posterior mandibular area Patients with an age above 18 years Systemically healthy patients Healed alveolar ridge for implant placement with: * Deficient buccolingual dimension ( ≤5mm) * Sufficient vertical height (≥ 10 mm) * Sufficient mesio-distal width (≥ 6.5 mm) Inter-arch space ≥ 7 mm to allow space for implant-supported crown Presence of neighboring and opposing dentition Soft tissue phenotype with keratinized tissue width (KTW) (≥2 mm) and gingival thickness (≥2 mm) Good oral hygiene Cooperative patients who accepted the trial follow up period and sign the informed consen

Exclusion criteria

* Systemic diseases or medications that might affect bone metabolism, increase surgical risk or complicate post-operative healing Untreated periodontal diseases History of radiation therapy to the head and neck Heavy smokers (≥ 10 cigarettes per day) Pregnant or lactating females Alcoholism or drug abuse Psychiatric problems Patients with signs of acute infection related to the area of interest

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Horizontal bone gain assessed radiographically (mm)Baseline , 4 monthUsing CBCT

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Amount of Pain7 daysVisual Analogue Scale (VAS) (Price et al., 1983)
Patient satisfaction4 monthQuestionnaire - Binary
Surgical TimeDuring SurgeryStop Watch
Horizontal bone gain assessed clinically (mm)Baseline , 4 monthBone Caliper
Histological Evaluation4 monthCore Biopsy

Contacts

Primary ContactYahya Amer, PhD
yahia.hassan@miuegypt.edu.eg+201006194329

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026