Skip to content

Safety and Validity of Extracorporeal Fenestration and in Situ Fenestration in Patients With Aortic Disease Involving the Left Subclavian Artery

Safety and Validity of Extracorporeal Fenestration and in Situ Fenestration in Patients With Aortic Disease Involving the Left Subclavian Artery

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06256757
Enrollment
170
Registered
2024-02-13
Start date
2024-05-01
Completion date
2029-04-30
Last updated
2024-02-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Aortic Dissection Aneurysm

Brief summary

This trial aims to demonstrate the safety and validity of extracorporeal fenestration and in situ fenestration in patients with aortic disease involving the left subclavian artery.

Interventions

PROCEDUREfenestration

Thoracic EndoVascular Aortic Repair (TEVAR) with fenestrations

Sponsors

The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

(All of the following criteria were met for enrolment): 1. Patients aged greater than 18 years old and less than 80 years old. 2. Patients diagnosed with thoracic aortic disease, including thoracic aortic dissection, thoracic aortic aneurysm, thoracic aortic ulcer and intramural hematoma. 3. Patients needed endovascular repair (TEVER). 4. Patients who needed complete coverage of the left subclavian artery (planned landing Zone was in Zone 2 of the aortic zone). 5. The proximal lesion involved the proximal aorta within 1.5cm of the posterior edge of the left subclavian artery (LSA) opening, but not the left common carotid artery (LCCA). 6. Suitable femoral artery, iliac artery and brachial artery access can be used for endovascular treatment. 7. The patients could understand the purpose of the study, volunteered to participate in the study, and informed consent was signed by the subjects themselves or their legal representatives. 8. Patients were willing to undergo follow-up evaluation as required by the study protocol. 9. The life expectancy of the patient is more than 12 months.

Exclusion criteria

(If any of the following criteria is met): 1. The lesion involved the proximal aorta of the LCCA opening (Zone 0 and Zone 1). 2. The patient has a definite connective tissue disease (e.g., Marfan syndrome). 3. The subjects had a history of previous thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). 4. Patients who have had or may have had severe allergic reactions to contrast media (anaphylactic shock, exfoliative dermatitis, etc.). 5. Patients with contraindications to antiplatelet and anticoagulant drugs. 6. The patient's compliance was poor and the follow-up could not be expected on time. 7. Patients with acute systemic infection. 8. Patients cannot tolerate general anesthesia. 9. Patients judged by the investigator to be ineligible for endovascular treatment.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
all-cause mortality1 month postoperativeall-cause mortality

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
incidence of secondary interventionpostoperative (1, 6,12 months)incidence of secondary intervention
incidence of major adverse events (MAE)postoperative (1, 6,12 months)incidence of major adverse events (MAE)
immediate technical success rateimmediate postoperativeimmediate technical success rate
all-cause mortalitypostoperative (6, 12 months)all-cause mortality
incidence of endoleakpostoperative (1, 6,12 months)incidence of endoleak

Contacts

Primary ContactYanbo Lou
yanbo_lou@zju.edu.cn15088201610

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 6, 2026