Skip to content

pBFS Guided rTMS Over Cognitive Control Network for ASD

Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Guided by Personalized Brain Functional Sectors (pBFS) for Low-Functioning Autism Spectrum Disorder: a Multi-center, Randomized, Sham-controlled Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06255535
Enrollment
215
Registered
2024-02-13
Start date
2024-04-01
Completion date
2026-12-01
Last updated
2025-02-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Autism Spectrum Disorder

Keywords

intellectual or development delay, personalized, TMS, functional MRI

Brief summary

The aim of this trial is to assess the efficacy and safety of precision neuromodulation for alleviating core symptoms in patients with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) who also have intellectual or developmental delay. The neuromodulation will be administered using intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) targeting the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), guided by personalized Brain Functional Sector (pBFS) technology.

Detailed description

Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) is a neurodevelopmental condition characterized by impaired social communication and repetitive behaviors. Unfortunately, evidence-based treatments have not proven effective for older individuals with low-functioning ASD, despite their significant need for intensive support. However, emerging evidence suggests that Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) has been successful in treating various psychiatric and neurological disorders. Given the broad cognitive control dysfunction observed in ASD, targeting cognitive control function may offer a promising treatment approach. Leveraging the personalized Brain Functional Sector (pBFS) technique and task-free functional MRI scans, we can precisely locate the cognitive control function region within the left DLPFC, and follow-up at 24-week after initiation of treatment. In this study, participants who meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria will be randomly assigned to either active or sham iTBS (intermittent theta burst stimulation) groups at a ratio of 2:1. The treatment protocol consists of a 12-week duration, with sessions conducted 5 days per week and 3 sessions iTBS over DLPFC per day. The inter-session interval is set at 30 minutes. Clinical evaluations focusing on ASD core symptoms and related behavioral profiles will be conducted at baseline and after the 12-week treatment period.

Interventions

DEVICEactive iTBS treatment

Participants will undergo three iTBS sessions per day, with 1800 pulses per session, over a 12-week period. Individualized targets will be generated using the pBFS technique.

DEVICEsham iTBS treatment

Participants will undergo three iTBS sessions per day, with 1800 pulses per session, over a 12-week period. Sham stimulation will be delivered through a sham coil with the identical appearance as real coil. Individualized targets will be generated using the pBFS technique.

Sponsors

Xi'an TCM Hospital of Encephalopathy
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Linyi Hedong Rehabilitation Hospital
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Jining Medical University
CollaboratorOTHER
Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Fujian Children's Hospital
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Hebei Provincial Mental Health Center
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Changping Laboratory
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
6 Years to 30 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* 6-30 years old * Have the diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder * ADOS-2 score is higher than the ASD cut-offs * Comorbid with intelligent disorder, IQ/DQ \< 70 * Primary environmental language is Chinese * Participant's parents or other legal guardians give informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Genetic Disorders, such as (e.g., Down syndrome, Fragile X syndrome, Rett syndorme), Current or history of severe ADHD, tourette syndrome, psychotic disorders (e.g., schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder) * Severe self-injury or suicidal behavior exhibited within the past year * Significant visual, auditory, deafness or motor disability that prevent them from following study procedures * Current or history diagnosis of epilepsy * Known severe physical diseases, particularly those affecting the brain * Metal implantation contradicted by MRI or TMS, such as artificial cardiac pacemakers, stents, cochlear implants * Respiratory or circulatory conditions increasing sedation risk, such as Apnea syndrome, severe snoring, or other relevant diseases * All legal guardians are illiterate, unable to read informed documents or complete questionnaires independently * Received transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), transcranial current stimulation (tCS), focused ultrasound (FUS), or other neuromodulation treatment in the last 3 months * Current participation in other clinical trials

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
ADOS-2 SA CSS score change after treatmentPre-treatment (baseline), post-treatment (12-week)The score changes of ADOS-2 SA CSS (Autism Diagnostic Observation Scale, 2nd edition, social affect domain, calibrated severity score) at 12-week from baseline. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Response rate in social ability after 12-week iTBS treatmentPre-treatment (baseline), post-treatment (12-week)Treatment response is defined as improvement, i.e., at least 1-point decreased, in the ADOS-2 SA For ADOS-2 SA, higher scores means more severe symptom.
Response rate in social ability at 24-week follow-upPre-treatment (baseline), follow-up (24-week)Treatment response is defined as improvement, i.e., at least 1-point decreased, in the ADOS-2 SA For ADOS-2 SA, higher scores means more severe symptom.
ADOS-2 total CSS change with treatmentPre-treatment (baseline), post-treatment (12-week), follow-up (24-week)The ADOS-2 total CSS score change from baseline. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.
ADOS-2 SA CSS score change from baseline to follow-upPre-treatment (baseline), post-treatment (12-week), follow-up (24-week)The score changes of ADOS-2 SA CSS from baseline, to 12-week posttreatment and, to 24-week follow-up. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.
CBCL score change with treatmentPre-treatment (baseline), post-treatment (12-week), follow-up (24-week)The CBCL (Child Behavior Checklist) score change from baseline. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.
QoL score change with treatmentPre-treatment (baseline), post-treatment (12-week), follow-up (24-week)The QoL (quality of life) score change from baseline. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.
AIM score change with treatmentPre-treatment (baseline), post-treatment (12-week), follow-up (24-week)The AIM (Autism Impact Measure) score change from baseline. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.
SCQ score change with treatmentPre-treatment (baseline), post-treatment (12-week), follow-up (24-week)The SCQ (Social Communication Questionnaire) score change from baseline. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactQi Liu, Ph.D.
liuqi@cpl.ac.cn010-80726688

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026