Skip to content

Minimally Invasive Techniques in Ventral Hernioplasty

Evaluation of Minimally Invasive Ventral Hernioplasty With Extraperitoneal Mesh Placement

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06255314
Enrollment
45
Registered
2024-02-13
Start date
2024-02-29
Completion date
2026-10-31
Last updated
2024-02-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Ventral Hernia

Brief summary

1. Review the surgical outcome of different techniques using extraperitoneal ventral hernia repair regarding postoperative pain. wound infection ,hospital stay , recurrence ,mesh migration and mesh induced visceral complications. 2. Reviewing advantages and drawbacks of each surgical technique regarding feasibility ,cost effectiveness and technical difficulties

Detailed description

The laparoscopic ventral hernia repair was first introduced by LeBlanc and Booth in the early 1990s . Since its introduction, it has continued to evolve and has become an important option in the hernia surgeon's armamentarium. However, only 27.4% of ventral hernia repairs are performed laparoscopically, likely because of the relatively advanced nature of this procedure and because all hernias may not be suitable for a laparoscopic approach. Using current techniques, numerous studies have documented the safety and efficacy of this approach. Some data suggest that the laparoscopic approach results in a shorter hospital stay and lower recurrence rates compared with open approaches. However, pain may still be significant after laparoscopic repairs and there are not significant advantages from this standpoint. Nonetheless, it is well accepted that the primary advantage of the laparoscopic approach is that wound infections are less frequent compared with open approaches .LeBlanc and Booth in 1993 first reported application of intra-peritoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) for ventral and incisional hernia, However the technique requires expensive fixation devices which may cause acute and chronic pain .The laparoscopic groin hernia repair using synthetic mesh in TEP or TAPP are acceptable surgical techniques today These techniques are rarely associated with mesh induced complications, the reason being extraperitoneal placement of synthetic mesh. It is apparent that despite great progress in mesh technology, nearly all types of meshes have been found to produce a varying level of adhesion or tissue reaction, regardless of the material and coating used. Preoperatively unpredictable, a mesh-induced visceral complication may occur in some patients to produce severe reaction or major mesh-related adverse events.The incitation to develop certain novel minimally invasive techniques that enables researchers to bring the mesh out of abdominal cavity has been an exciting trend in laparoscopic hernia repair.

Interventions

PROCEDUREventral hernia repair

Laparoscopic transabdominal retromuscular repair is a minimally invasive approach to the open Rives Stoppa retromuscular sublay repair for ventral hernia. In ventral hernia repair, it relies on initiation of dissection in one retrorectus space and then crossover to the contralateral retrorectus space The sublay mesh technique is an open surgical procedure for ventral and incisional hernias

Sponsors

Assiut University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* • Able to give informed consent for inclusion in the study * Age of the patient : above 18 years * Any type of ventral hernia including umbilical,paraumbilical,epigastric,spigelian and incisional hernias

Exclusion criteria

* • Patients with inguinal hernia. * Strangulated or obstructed hernia. * Previous mesh hernia repair. * Loss of abdominal domain. * Infected or contaminated field. * Defect size more than 10cm.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Operative timefrom inflation of abdomen till deflation in laparoscopic repair and from skin incision up to skin closure in open repair.
Intra operative injuries including bowel or vascular injuriesintra operative

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
• Surgical site infectionpostoperative up to 1month
• Hernia recurrence: 1year
•Rate of mesh related complication such as bowel erosion1 year
Cost effectiveness: 6monthscost of polyprolene mesh compared to composite mesh by egyptian pound
• Surgical site occurrence of hematoma ,seroma, necrosis: 30 days

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

Primary Contactmohamed badr
akhel93@yahoo.com01060624371
Backup Contactsamir ammar, MD
samirahmed22@aun.edu.eg01141459567

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026