Skip to content

Comparing Skills Acquisition on Different Laparoscopy Software

Re-defining Proficiency Levels Might be Necessary When Virtual Reality Simulator Software is Updated - a Randomized Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06255080
Enrollment
20
Registered
2024-02-12
Start date
2022-09-01
Completion date
2023-01-20
Last updated
2024-02-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Simulation Training, Laparoscopy

Brief summary

Simulation based training is a standard part of surgical training. Over the years virtual reality simulator have been more and more integrated into the surgical curriculum for surgical novices. Evidence shows that practicing using proficiency-based training programs significantly reduces the operation time and complication rates for during intial operations for young doctors. The aim of this trial is to examine if skills obtained on a newer software version is transferable to the original software.

Interventions

The intervention consists of making the intervention group practice till proficiency using the 2019-version. The control group practices till they have reached proficiency using the standard 2016-version. We wanted to compare time to completetion for the intervention. For the follow-up test we invited all participants to return after 4-6 weeks (where no training was allowed) and made them practice till proficiency again using the standard 2016-version. Time to reach proficiency for the follow-up test was compared.

Sponsors

Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Medical students without any prior laparoscopy experience in both a clinical or simulated setting

Exclusion criteria

* Prior experience with simulation based laparoscopy or clinical experience with laparoscopy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to reach proficiency (in minutes)1-2 monthsTo examine if there was any difference in the time to reach proficiency for the two software versions

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Transferability of skills2-3 weeksWe made all 20 participants return for a follow-up test, where they had to practice till they reached proficiency again using the standard 2016-version. Time to complete was compared

Countries

Denmark

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026