Dental Caries in Children, Dental Materials
Conditions
Keywords
GIc/Zirconomer
Brief summary
Is zirconomer restorative material more effective than a glass ionomer cement in restoration of primary molars
Detailed description
This trial seeks to evaluate the clinical and radiographic performance of two materials zirconomer restorative material and glass ionomer cement to achieve better treatment for primary molars.
Interventions
OTHERGlass ionomer cement
Restorative material
OTHERzirconia reinforced glass ionomer
Restorative material
Sponsors
Cairo University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Masking description
statistician
Intervention model description
last decade has seen several innovative additions to enhance the properties of GIC whilst simplifying its usage. Unlike the early glass-ionomers, these newer systems are easy and more practical to use as a dental restorative and luting material for preschoolers, children and teenagers alike. These new varieties are composed of ceramic and zirconia reinforced glass ionomer cements were introduced to provide better drawbacks of amalgam as well as tooth-colored restorative materials exhibiting the strength of amalgam and at the same time maintain the fluoride releasing capacity of GIC providing better mechanical properties.
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
5 Years to 7 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Inclusion criteria: 1. Children having carious primary molars(class1) without pulp exposure and normal radiograph. 2. Children between age 5 and 7 years. 3. Both male and female are included. 4. Cooperative Children.
Exclusion criteria
<!-- --> 1. Patients with systemic diseases. 2. Parent refuse to participate.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Recurrent CariesColor match | 12 MONTHS | Radiographic Visual inspection using Modified United States Public Health Service Ryge criteria USPHS |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Color match | 12 MONTHS | visual inspection using Modified United States Public Health Service Ryge criteria USPHS |
| Marginal Discoloration | 12 MONTHS | using visual inspection Modified United States Public Health Service Ryge criteria USPHS |
| Marginal Adaptation | 12 MONTHS | using visual inspection Modified United States Public Health Service Ryge criteria USPHS |
| -Anatomic Form | 12 MONTHS | using visual inspection Modified United States Public Health Service Ryge criteria USPHS |
Contacts
Primary ContactTamador A hmedIbrahim ali, Master
Backup ContactMujahed a hmed Ibrahim Ali, MASTER
Outcome results
None listed