Anxiety, Depression, Intimate Partner Violence, PTSD
Conditions
Brief summary
Adapting mental health treatments to address modifiable interpersonal problems has the potential to improve and sustain outcomes in low-resource settings where treatment gaps persist. This K23 Award will prepare the candidate to become an independent investigator with high-impact public health research and expertise in couple-based interventions that address interrelated mental health problems and intimate partner violence in couples by gaining expertise in engagement and treatment of men, adapting an evidence-based treatment for common mental disorders to address IPV in couples, designing and conducting randomized controlled trials with couples, and professional skills development. This work has applicability for low-resource low-income countries and US populations that experience couple-based violence and the mental health treatment gap. With its focus on intimate partners, the intervention also has the potential to benefit health and wellbeing of children.
Interventions
Interpersonal Psychotherapy for Couples (IPT-C) consists of 8 weekly conjoint sessions. The clinical goals are to promote resolution of the role dispute via renegotiation of role relations between the marriage partners and improve common mental disorders in the woman. Like Interpersonal Psychotherapy, IPT-C has an initiation phase (Session 1-2), middle phase (Sessions 3-6), and termination phase (Sessions 7-8).
Interpersonal Psychotherapy (IPT) is an evidence-based treatment to reduce depression and other common mental disorders. It focuses on helping patients resolve interpersonal problems of disagreements, loneliness, life changes, and grief, and/or change their orientation to the problem.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Both partners aged ≥18; * both partners identify each other as one of (in case of polygamous marriage) their primary sexual partners of the opposite sex; * partnered for at least 3 months; * woman screens positive for a CMD using the Mental Wellness Tool developed and validated by our PRIDE team in Mozambique; * couples have mild to moderate forms of situational IPV (Ongoing Abuse Scale score = 1 or above). See below
Exclusion criteria
for how severity will be determined.; * both partners desire to maintain the relationship; * woman identifies marital dispute as the main interpersonal problem area causing CMD symptoms.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Wellness Tool | measured at pre-treatment and weeks 8, 12, 20, 32 | The Mental Wellness Tool was developed and validated by the PRIDE team in Mozambique to screen for and differentiate cases according to presence or absence of common mental disorders, severe mental illness, substance use disorders, and suicidal risk. Patients are asked three initial questions. If they respond positively to any of the 3 items, they are asked 10 additional items. The Mental Wellness Tool will be used to screen patients for common mental disorders and exclude patients with severe mental illness, substance use disorders, or suicidality. It will additionally be used to track metrics to determine Reach (i.e., number in need). |
| Client Satisfaction Questionnaire Client Satisfaction Questionnaire - 8 (CSQ-8) | measured at week 8 | The Client Satisfaction Questionnaire - 8 measures respondents' opinions about services they have received. Responses are based on a four-point scale (ranging from very negative to very positive), but the options differ depending on the item. Scores range from 8 to 32; higher values indicate higher satisfaction. Scores are calculated by summing scores across all items. |
| IPT Fidelity Checklist | measured up to 8 weeks | The IPT Fidelity Checklist measures provider fidelity to Interpersonal Therapy. Providers are assessed for low (1), moderate (2), or high (3) adherence to each treatment element. A total score is calculated y summing individuals items. The PRIDE team has adapted this Checklist for Interpersonal Counseling, which will be further adapted in the proposed study for couple-based treatment. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| PTSD Checklist - Civilian Version (PCL-C) | measured at pre-treatment and weeks 8, 12, 20, 32 | The PCL-C is a standardized self-report scale for PTSD comprised of 17 items. It uses a 5-point scale where respondents indicate how much they have been bothered by a symptom (1 = Not at All \- 5 = Extremely). Items are totaled for a severity score (range = 17-85; 17-29 = little to no severity; 30-44 = moderate to moderately high severity; 45-85 = high severity). |
| Revised Conflict Tactics Scale | measured at pre-treatment and weeks 8, 12, 20, 32 | The Revised Conflict Tactics Scale measures physical, psychological, and sexual intimate partner violence. It consists of 39 items are asked twice: once for respondent and once for partner. Item responses gauge frequency and range from Never to 20 or more times. It has five subscales: Negotiation, Psychological Aggression, Physical Assault, Injury, and Sexual Coercion. |
| Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) | measured at pre-treatment and weeks 8, 12, 20, 32 | The AUDIT is comprised of 10 items that screen for hazardous or dependent drinking levels. Questions range from 0 to 4 with the exception of items 9 and 10 which have three response options and are scored 0, 2, 4. Items are summed. Score cut off points are 8 (hazardous drinking) and 13 women/15 men (alcohol dependence). |
| Dyadic Adjustment Scale | measured at pre-treatment and weeks 8, 12, 20, 32 | The Dyadic Adjustment Scale (32 Likert items) measures relationship functioning and satisfaction. The four subscales include: Dyadic Satisfaction, Dyadic Consensus, Dyadic Cohesion, and Dyadic Affectional Expression. The score range is 1-151. A higher score indicates better adjustment to marriage. |
| Patient Health Questionnaire - 9 (PHQ-9) | measured at pre-treatment and weeks 8, 12, 20, 32 | The PHQ-9 is an instrument for screening, diagnosing, monitoring, and measuring severity of depression. Score cut offs for depression are 5 (mild), 10 (moderate), 15 (moderately severe) and 20 (severe). |
| Generalized Anxiety Disorder - 7 (GAD-7) | measured at pre-treatment and weeks 8, 12, 20, 32 | GAD-7 is a screening instrument with seven items to assess presence and severity of generalized anxiety severity. Scores range from 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day) for a total range of 0 to 21. Score cut off points are 5 (mild), 10 (moderate), 15 (severe) anxiety. |
Other
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Adverse Childhood Experiences-International Questionnaire | measured at pre-treatment | The Adverse Childhood Experiences- International Questionnaire (43 dichotomous (yes/no) and Likert scale items) measures adverse childhood experiences. Domains include family dysfunction; physical, sexual and emotional abuse and neglect by parents or caregivers; peer violence; witnessing community violence; and exposure to collective violence. A higher composite score indicates more adverse experiences an individual was exposed to in childhood. |