Skip to content

Real-world Evaluation of Diagnostic and Treatment Strategies in Low-Risk Basal Cell Carcinoma

Real-world Evaluation of (Non-invasive) Diagnostic and Treatment Strategies in Low-Risk Basal Cell Carcinoma: a Prospective Cohort Study

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06252857
Acronym
REDT-BCC
Enrollment
142
Registered
2024-02-12
Start date
2024-04-22
Completion date
2026-04-30
Last updated
2024-05-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Basal Cell Carcinoma

Keywords

imiquimod, surgical excision

Brief summary

Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most prevalent form of cancer among the Caucasian population. There are several subtypes of BCC with different clinical characteristics and treatment strategies. Superficial and nodular BCCs are low-risk BCC subtypes. The diagnosis and subtype of BCC can be confirmed by means of punch biopsy, but non-invasive diagnosis by means of Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) is proven to be a non-inferior alternative diagnostic instrument. Besides, non-invasive topical treatment is recommended as valuable treatment alternative to surgical excision for low-risk BCC. Since non-invasive diagnosis and treatment for low-risk BCC is being implemented into daily practice, we want to evaluate the real-world effectiveness of different invasive and non-invasive diagnostic and treatment strategies in the management of low-risk BCC. This real-world evidence will enhance our understanding of these management strategies for low-risk BCC in daily practice.

Interventions

DRUGImiquimod Topical

Topical application of imiquimod (once daily, 5 days a week, during 6 weeks) versus surgical excision.

Sponsors

Maastricht University Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Patients ≥18 years old * Diagnosis of low-risk BCC based on CDE with OCT confirmation or with histopathological verification in case OCT diagnosis is doubtful. * Tumors meeting the criteria for low-risk BCC * Patient is able to understand the instruction regarding the study participation and application of IMQ treatment

Exclusion criteria

* Tumor location in the H-zone of the face or hairy scalp, anogenital area * Diagnosis of recurrent BCC or previous skin cancer within 2cm of the treatment area * Strong suspicion/diagnosis of high-risk BCC subtype or other skin condition on OCT or punch biopsy * Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding * Previous allergy or intolerance to IMQ * No concurrent use any other systemic chemopreventive or immunosuppressive medication during the treatment period, 30 days before start and 3 months after the end of treatment * Limited understanding of the Dutch language and not being able to give informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Effectiveness of imiquimod versus surgical excision1 year post-treatmentTreatment success, expressed as the proportion of tumor free patients

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Adverse effectsDuring imiquimod treatment, reported by the patientIncidence and severity of adverse effects
Mean treatment compliance for patients in the imiquimod groupDuring treatment, reported by the patient in a treatment checklistIn percentages
Cosmetic outcome1 year post-treatmentPatient-reported satisfaction with cosmetic result of treatment area, expressed as mean score on the DASS questionnaire
Patient treatment satisfaction1 year post-treatmentPatient-reported satisfaction with treatment, expressed as the proportion of patients reporting to be satisfied with their treatment on a 4-point Likert-scale.
Cost-effectiveness analysis1 year post-treatmentCost-effectiveness will be analysed from a health-care perspective: pre-, during and post-treatment costs will be recorded and analysed and compared in both treatment groups using a cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA)

Countries

Netherlands

Contacts

Primary ContactMyrthe MG Moermans, MD
myrthe.moermans@mumc.nl+31433877295

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026