Early Sedation With Dexmedetomidine vs. Placebo in Older Ventilated Critically Ill Patients

Respiratory Insufficiency

Mechanical Ventilation, Sedation, Randomized Control Trial, Acute Respiratory Failure

Sedation remains a ubiquitous and crucial component of intensive care treatments in critically ill mechanically ventilated patients. Sedation relieves anxiety, reduces distress, and promotes tolerance of endotracheal intubation and associated life-sustaining interventions such as mechanical ventilation, cardiovascular assistance, and renal support. Thus, choosing the optimal sedative agent is vital to patient comfort, safety, and survival. Despite more than 20 years of intensive care sedation research, there is still no consensus on what constitutes best sedation practice. The Society of Critical Care Medicine, the premier critical care organisation in North America, published the 2018 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of Pain, Agitation/Sedation, Delirium, Immobility and Sleep (PADIS) disruption (chaired by our primary applicant W.A.) and issued weak recommendations to provide analgesia before sedation, to target light sedation whenever clinically feasible, and to use either dexmedetomidine or propofol over midazolam for the sedation of mechanically ventilated critically ill patients. Similarly, the American Thoracic Society produced a set of Clinical Practice Guidelines to promote liberation and weaning from mechanical ventilation in critically ill patients, with weak recommendations for the use of non-benzodiazepines as primary sedatives and to target light sedation when clinically possible. A weak recommendation was issued in an Intensive Care Medicine Rapid Practice Guideline published in 2022 to use dexmedetomidine over propofol for sedation of critically ill adults, if the desired outcome is a reduction in delirium. These guidelines, however, do not consider age-dependent pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, illness severity, timing of sedative administration, operative vs medical reason for admission, or the changing dynamics of sedation practice at different phases of critical illness. The lack of high-level evidence to inform sedation practice in the critically ill has led to approaches that are mainly opinion-based and lack the support of evidence from large multicentre, international randomised clinical trials.

1. BACKGROUND Current guidelines highlight evidence gaps to be addressed in future sedation trials, particularly the need for adequately powered trials to evaluate impact of sedative choice in older adults, as they have a highest overall mortality and the most common demographic to require an ICU admission of all age groups. Dexmedetomidine, an α2-adrenergic agonist sedative, may be the solution. The SPICE III trial, a prelude to the SPICE IV study, evaluated early sedation with dexmedetomidine versus usual care sedation in 4000 critically ill patients. The SPICE III trial identified a heterogeneity of treatment effect (HTE) on the primary outcome of 90-day mortality, suggesting lower mortality in older patients. To further evaluate the observed HTE, SPICE IV was designed as a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial with a study population restricted to patients at or older than 65 years of age. 2. HYPOTHESIS Early sedation with DEX as the primary sedative agent reduces 90-day all-cause mortality in invasively mechanically ventilated patients who are ≥ 65 years of age. 3. OBJECTIVES The primary aim is to determine whether, in invasively mechanically ventilated patients who are ≥ 65 years of age, early sedation with DEX as the primary sedative agent reduces 90-day all-cause mortality. The secondary aims are to assess the effect of DEX on ventilator free days, coma and delirium free days, major adverse kidney events (MAKE-28) at day 28, duration of ventilation, and hospital stay in survivors. 4. METHODS This is a prospective, double-blind, placebo controlled, randomised trial of early sedation with dexmedetomidine in invasively mechanically ventilated patients who are ≥ 65 years of age and who are expected to remain ventilated more than one calendar day after randomization. Randomization will occur via a secured website. A total of 300 patients will be recruited across Canadian centres and assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either: early dexmedetomidine (Intervention arm) or placebo (Control arm).Patients in the active intervention arm will receive a dexmedetomidine infusion starting at a recommended dose of 1 µg/kg/h without a loading dose. Patients in the control arm will receive normal saline at equivalent doses. Analgesia will be optimized in both groups as clinically indicated. The sedation target is defined by the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) score of -1 to +1 at all times, unless otherwise clinically indicated.

No related papers found yet.

Canada