Skip to content

Clinical Comparison of Two Soft Contact Lenses

A Clinical Comparison of Two Soft Contact Lenses (Iteration Under Umbrella Protocol C19-678)

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06251154
Enrollment
50
Registered
2024-02-09
Start date
2023-12-11
Completion date
2024-01-08
Last updated
2024-08-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Myopia

Brief summary

This study was designed to gather short-term clinical performance data for 2 soft contact lenses.

Detailed description

The purpose of this participant-masked, non-randomized, crossover controlled, non-dispensing, study was to compare the short-term performance of 2 daily disposable contact lenses after 15 minutes of daily wear each. The lenses were identical in all aspects except for diameter. Participants attended for 1 visit only which lasted for approximately 2 hours.

Interventions

DEVICELens 1

Daily disposable silicone hydrogel contact lens (diameter=14.0mm) for 15 minutes

DEVICELens 2

Daily disposable silicone hydrogel contact lens (diameter=14.1mm) for 15 minutes

Sponsors

CooperVision, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subjects will only be eligible for the study if: 1. They were of legal age (18) and capacity to volunteer. 2. They understood their rights as a research subject and were willing and able to sign a Statement of Informed Consent. 3. They were willing and able to follow the protocol. 4. They were wearing soft contact lenses, or had done so within the past two years. 5. They were able to be fitted with the study lenses within the power range available.

Exclusion criteria

* Subjects will not be eligible if: 1. They had an ocular disorder which would normally contra-indicate contact lens wear. 2. They had a systemic disorder which would normally contra-indicate contact lens wear. 3. They were using any topical medication such as eye drops or ointment. 4. They were aphakic. 5. They had had corneal refractive surgery. 6. They had any corneal distortion resulting from previous hard or rigid lens wear or had keratoconus. 7. They were pregnant or lactating. 8. They had an eye or health condition including an immunosuppressive or infectious disease which could, in the opinion of the investigator, contraindicate contact lens wear or pose a risk to study personnel; or a history of anaphylaxis or severe allergic reaction. 9. They had taken part in any contact lens or care system clinical research within two weeks prior to starting this study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Subjective Overall Score15 minutesSubjective overall score was assessed using 0-100 visual analogue scale, where 0=Extremely poor, unmanageable, cannot use lenses and 100=Excellent, highly impressed with these lenses overall

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Subjective Comfort15 minutesSubjective comfort score was assessed using 0-100 visual analogue scale, where 0=Extremely uncomfortable, causes pain, cannot be tolerated and 100=Excellent, cannot be felt
Subjective Vision15 minutesSubjective vision score was assessed using a 0-100 visual analogue scale, where 0=Extremely poor, intolerable, lens cannot be worn and 100=Excellent, unaware of any visual loss

Countries

United Kingdom

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Overall Study
All participants who participated in the clinical trial.
50
Total50

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicOverall Study
Age, Continuous37.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.6
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected— Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
27 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
23 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 500 / 50
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 500 / 50
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 500 / 50

Outcome results

Primary

Subjective Overall Score

Subjective overall score was assessed using 0-100 visual analogue scale, where 0=Extremely poor, unmanageable, cannot use lenses and 100=Excellent, highly impressed with these lenses overall

Time frame: 15 minutes

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lens 1Subjective Overall Score80.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.7
Lens 2Subjective Overall Score88.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11
Secondary

Subjective Comfort

Subjective comfort score was assessed using 0-100 visual analogue scale, where 0=Extremely uncomfortable, causes pain, cannot be tolerated and 100=Excellent, cannot be felt

Time frame: 15 minutes

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lens 1Subjective Comfort81.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.1
Lens 2Subjective Comfort90.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.6
Secondary

Subjective Vision

Subjective vision score was assessed using a 0-100 visual analogue scale, where 0=Extremely poor, intolerable, lens cannot be worn and 100=Excellent, unaware of any visual loss

Time frame: 15 minutes

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lens 1Subjective Vision81.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.1
Lens 2Subjective Vision87.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.6

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026