Skip to content

Sequential Use of Foley's Catheter and Misoprostol Versus Misoprostol Alone for Induction of Labour: a Multicentre Randomised Controlled Trial

Sequential Use of Foley's Catheter and Low Dose Oral Misoprostol Versus Misoprostol Alone for Induction of Labour : a Multicentre Randomised Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06249815
Enrollment
400
Registered
2024-02-08
Start date
2024-04-26
Completion date
2024-12-31
Last updated
2025-02-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Induction of Labor

Keywords

Induction of labor, low dose misoprostol, Foley Catheter

Brief summary

Evaluation of efficacy of inducing labour using a Foley's catheter and low dose oral misoprostol sequentially, in comparison with low dose oral misoprostol alone.

Detailed description

a multicentre, open-label randomised controlled trial in 2 hospitals in the Almaty,Kazakhstan. Women with a term singleton pregnancy in cephalic presentation, an unfavourable cervix, intact membranes, and without a previous caesarean section will be randomly allocated to 2 groups: 1 group -cervical ripening with Foley's catheter for 16 hour and sequentially 25 μg oral misoprostol once every 2 hour, 2 nd group- 25 μg oral misoprostol once every 2 hour. The primary outcome will be vaginal delivery within 24 hours(to evaluate effectiveness) and secondary outcoms 1-5-min Apgar score and hospitalization in ICU, rate of hyperstimulation ,hemorrage,chorioamnionitis (for evaluating safety)

Interventions

COMBINATION_PRODUCTMisoprostol 200mcg Tab

ranscervical Foley catheter (silicone, size 20F with 30ml balloon)+Misoprostol 200 mcg dissolvedwith 200 ml water and divided to 25ml solution every 2 hours per os for maximum of 8 doses

Sponsors

Asfendiyarov Kazakh National Medical University
CollaboratorOTHER
Kazakhstan's Medical University KSPH
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 49 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* women with an unfavourable cervix who will scheduled for induction of labour

Exclusion criteria

* Women with previous caesarean sections unable to give informed consent Multiple pregnancy History of allergy to misoprostol Ruptured membranes All cases when physiological childbirth is impossible (placenta previa,transverse position of the fetus )

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Efficiency of induction24 hours.Number of Participants with vaginal births

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Safety for baby5 minutesRate of cases Apgar score \<7 points
Safety for mother24 hourincidence of hyperstimulation
rete of hemorrage24 hourbleeding more than 500 ml during the vaginal delivery, more than 1000 ml after c-section
rate of chorioamnionitis chorioamnionitis24 hourmeconial amniotic fluid, tachycardia, leukocytosis

Countries

Kazakhstan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026