Skip to content

Intermittent Oral-esophageal Tube in Delayed Dysphagia After Radiotherapy for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

Observation of Intermittent Oral-esophageal Tube Feeding in Delayed Dysphagia After Radiotherapy for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Randomly Controlled Study

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06248840
Enrollment
56
Registered
2024-02-08
Start date
2022-06-01
Completion date
2022-12-31
Last updated
2024-03-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

Brief summary

This is a prospective multicenter study with patients with delayed dysphagia after radiotherapy for NPC. Patients enrolled are randomly divided equally into the observation group and the control group. All patients receive conventional care, and the observation group received IOE while the control group received NGT for enteral nutrition support. Baseline information (demographics, medical history, etc.), nutritional status at admission and after treatment, depression, dysphagia, and quality of life (QOL) after treatment as well as adverse events are compared.

Detailed description

Palliation to delayed dysphagia after radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) continues to be a challenge. Although nasogastric tube feeding (NGT) has been adopted widely, the weaknesses have yet to be improved by another enteral nutrition support mode. This study aims to observe the clinical efficacy of intermittent oro-esophageal tube feeding (IOE) in the treatment of delayed dysphagia after radiotherapy for (NPC). This is a prospective multicenter study with patients with delayed dysphagia after radiotherapy for NPC. Patients enrolled are randomly divided equally into the observation group and the control group. All patients receive conventional care, and the observation group received IOE while the control group received NGT for enteral nutrition support. Baseline information (demographics, medical history, etc.), nutritional status at admission and after treatment, depression, dysphagia, and quality of life (QOL) after treatment as well as adverse events are compared.

Interventions

During the 15-day treatment, both groups of patients are hospitalized, while conventional care and enteral nutrition support are provided to the two groups. Specifically, conventional care includes health education, dietary adjustments, nasopharyngeal hygiene, management of risk factors (blood pressure and lipid control, etc.), exercise rehabilitation, and psychological support. The frequency and content of these interventions are arranged based on the health condition.The observation group receives Intermittent Oral-esophageal Tube Feeding for enteral nutrition support (developed by the Dysphagia Institute of Zhengzhou University, CN201821314797.2), which is made of silicone material, 40 cm long, with an inner diameter of 0.54 cm.

DEVICEnasogastric tube feeding

During the 15-day treatment, both groups of patients are hospitalized, while conventional care and enteral nutrition support are provided to the two groups. Specifically, conventional care includes health education, dietary adjustments, nasopharyngeal hygiene, management of risk factors (blood pressure and lipid control, etc.), exercise rehabilitation, and psychological support. The frequency and content of these interventions are arranged based on the health condition.The control group is provided with nutritional support as nasogastric tube feeding, performed 6-10 times per day according to relevant guidelines, with an interval of more than 2 hours between every two feedings, and a feeding volume not exceeding 200 ml per time.

Sponsors

Zeng Changhao
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
DOUBLE (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age between 18 and 65 years. * With the history of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma and radiation therapy. * With dysphagia occurred at least three years after radiotherapy (confirmed by videofluoroscopic swallowing study), in need of and feasible for enteral nutrition support. * Conscious and with stable vital signs; * Willing to participate and sign the written informed consent form either personally or by a family member.

Exclusion criteria

* Presence of other diseases that might cause dysphagia. * With distant metastasis of tumors, or complicated with severe systemic disorders or malignancies. * Concurrent participation in other treatments that could interfere with the trial. * Inability to cooperate with treatment due to aphasia, mental health issues, etc. * Received tube feeding for enteral nutrition support within the past three years.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Body Mass Indexday 1 and day 15Body Mass Index was assessed with the combination of body weight and height: weight (kg)/ \[height (m)\] \^2
Serum prealbuminday 1 and day 15Serum prealbumin was recorded through the blood routine test.(PA, g/L)
Hemoglobinday 1 and day 15Hemoglobin was recorded through the blood routine test. (Hb, g/L)
Serum albuminday 1 and day 15Serum albumin was recorded through the blood routine test. (ALB, g/L)
Total serum proteinday 1 and day 15Total serum protein was recorded through the blood routine test. (TP, g/L)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Swallowing-Quality of Life questionnaireday 1 and day 15The Chinese version of the Swallowing-Quality of Life questionnaire (SWAL-QOL) was used to assess the quality of life of patients.he Likert scale ranging from 1 to 5 was utilized for scoring, with a total of 44 items, including difficulties in swallowing, dietary restrictions, oral health, social communication, and others. The total score was converted to a standard percentage scale ranging from 0 to 100, with positively correlated with QOL.
Functional Oral Intake Scaleday 1 and day 15The Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS) was used to evaluate function of oral intake. In the FOIS assessment, two professional rehabilitation therapists communicated with the patients, observed and recorded to assess their swallowing function. The assessment scale consists of seven levels, with a higher level indicating progressively better swallowing function (less dysphagia).
Penetration-Aspiration Scaleday 1 and day 15In this study, the Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS) was recruited, which was a commonly used to evaluate the occurrence of penetration or aspiration during swallowing. It categorizes dysphagia into eight levels, with Level 0 indicating no penetration or aspiration and Level 8 indicating severe aspiration. A higher level indicates more severe dysphagia.
Depressionday 1 and day 15The PATIENT HEALTH QUESTIONNAIRE scale is utilized to evaluate the depression of patients at admission and after treatment. Options representing varying degrees of severity, ranging from 0 to 3 were provided in each aspect. The total scores between 0 and 4 were classified as negative, indicating the absence of depressive symptoms, while scores above 4 were classified as positive, indicating the presence of potential depressive symptoms.

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026